Graham K
Addiction Research Foundation, University of Western Ontario, London.
Addict Behav. 1988;13(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90015-9.
The extent of alcohol consumption and problems has been found to be related to the types of reasons for consuming. At least two types of motives have been identified ("personal effects" and "social") with "personal effects" motives related to higher consumption and more alcohol problems. The present study tested the applicability of this model to caffeine consumption, in particular, coffee and tea. Eighteen motives for consuming coffee and tea were used to predict coffee/tea consumption, dependence, and problems. Principal component analyses identified four types of motives: two social ("sociability" and "beverage") and two personal effects ("stimulant" and "relief"). Overall, the "relief" and "stimulant" types of motives were the best predictors for all criterion measures (consumption, dependence and problems); "beverage" motives strongly predicted consumption and dependence; and "sociability" motives were least useful in predicting all criterion measures. These results are consistent with research on the relationship between extent of alcohol consumption/problems and reasons for consuming.
酒精消费程度及相关问题已被发现与饮酒原因类型有关。已确定至少两种动机类型(“个人影响”和“社交”),其中“个人影响”动机与更高的饮酒量及更多酒精问题相关。本研究测试了该模型对咖啡因消费(特别是咖啡和茶)的适用性。使用18种饮用咖啡和茶的动机来预测咖啡/茶的消费量、成瘾性及相关问题。主成分分析确定了四种动机类型:两种社交动机(“社交性”和“饮品”)以及两种个人影响动机(“兴奋剂”和“缓解”)。总体而言,“缓解”和“兴奋剂”类型的动机是所有标准测量指标(消费量、成瘾性和问题)的最佳预测指标;“饮品”动机强烈预测消费量和成瘾性;而“社交性”动机在预测所有标准测量指标方面最无用。这些结果与关于酒精消费程度/问题与饮酒原因之间关系的研究一致。