Suppr超能文献

遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症合并心房颤动患者左心耳封堵术后减少或停用抗栓治疗的安全性

Safety of reduced or absent antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure in patients affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Pepe Martino, Suppressa Patrizia, Giuliano Antonio F, Nestola Palma L, Bortone Alessandro S, DE Cillis Emanuela, Acquaviva Tommaso, Forleo Cinzia, Moscarelli Marco, Lenato Gennaro M, Sabbà Carlo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

C. Frugoni Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Center for Rare Diseases, VascERN HHT Reference Center Policlinico University Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2022 Oct;70(5):537-544. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05474-2. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents a novel therapeutic chance for patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as those affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, current experts' indications suggest the postprocedural administration of antithrombotic therapies to minimize the residual thromboembolic risk due to AF and to the need for device endothelialization. The aim of our study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of LAA closure in preventing arterial thromboembolism in a very high-bleeding risk group, such as HHT patients, who are at risk not to tolerate even the mild postprocedural antithrombotic therapy usually recommended.

METHODS

Eight HHT-affected patients with non-valvular AF, high-bleeding risk and/or known intolerance to antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy were treated with interventional LAA occlusion with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug™ and Amplatzer™ Amulet™ devices. Device implantation was successful in all patients.

RESULTS

Postprocedural antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy was attempted in seven patients: adherence to therapy exceeded 6 months only for one, while four patients suspended all antithrombotic medications within 30 days from the procedure due to an increase in bleeding frequency and/or severity and the other two discontinued treatment within 6 months; a single patient was not prescribed any antithrombotic therapy. At a medium follow-up of 22.4±14.3 months no thromboembolic episodes attributable to AF or device related thrombosis were reported. Two deaths were recorded 1231 and 783 days after the procedure which were classified as unrelated to any cerebral or cardiovascular accident.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the percutaneous LAA closure in HHT patients with AF could be safe and effective in preventing arterial systemic thromboembolism, also in the presence of reduced or absent postinterventional antithrombotic treatment. LAA occluder implantation can represent a valid and potentially life-saving alternative to lifelong anticoagulant therapy in HHT, as in other very high-bleeding risk patients.

摘要

背景

对于长期抗凝治疗存在禁忌的患者,如患有遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症(HHT)和心房颤动(AF)的患者,左心耳(LAA)封堵术是一种新的治疗选择。然而,目前专家的建议是术后给予抗栓治疗,以将AF和器械内皮化导致的残余血栓栓塞风险降至最低。我们研究的目的是调查LAA封堵术在预防高出血风险组(如HHT患者)动脉血栓栓塞方面的安全性和有效性,这些患者甚至无法耐受通常推荐的轻度术后抗栓治疗。

方法

8例患有非瓣膜性AF、高出血风险和/或已知对抗血小板和抗凝治疗不耐受的HHT患者接受了使用Amplatzer™心脏封堵器™和Amplatzer™护身符™器械的介入性LAA封堵治疗。所有患者均成功植入器械。

结果

7例患者尝试了术后抗血小板/抗凝治疗:只有1例患者坚持治疗超过6个月,而4例患者因出血频率和/或严重程度增加在术后30天内停用了所有抗栓药物,另外2例在6个月内停止治疗;1例患者未接受任何抗栓治疗。在平均22.4±14.3个月的随访中,未报告任何由AF或器械相关血栓形成引起的血栓栓塞事件。术后1231天和783天记录了两例死亡病例,分类为与任何脑血管或心血管意外无关。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于患有AF的HHT患者,经皮LAA封堵术在预防动脉系统血栓栓塞方面可能是安全有效的,即使术后抗栓治疗减少或未进行。与其他高出血风险患者一样,LAA封堵器植入术可能是HHT患者终身抗凝治疗的有效且可能挽救生命的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验