• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人或经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌,两者皆用如何?来自单中心的可行性和结果。

Robotic or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) approach for rectal cancer, how about both? Feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01206-7. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-021-01206-7
PMID:33704671
Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is technically challenging. Robotic and transanal TME (TaTME) are both novel approaches developed to provide better visualization and dissection. We aim to combine both approaches in a hybrid procedure and evaluate the feasibility as well as patient and oncological outcomes in this study. A review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a hybrid abdominal robotic approach with TaTME for rectal cancer between January 2016 and October 2018 was undertaken. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and surgical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. A total of 69 patients (43 males, 26 females) received this hybrid approach. Their median age was 58 years (range 35-87) with a mean BMI of 24.3 kg/m (range 16.4-44.2). Median distance from anal verge was 5 cm (range 2-9). The patients had a median hospital length of stay of 7 days (range 5-28). Complication rate was 17.4% (12 patients) with 3 patients (4.3%) requiring a reoperation. TME quality was optimal with all of them either complete (81.2%) or almost complete (18.8%). 65 patients (94.2%) had an R0 resection with 4 patients (5.8%) with involved circumferential resection margins (≤ 1 mm). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 20 (range 6-37). After a median follow-up of 27.7 months (range 7-42), local recurrence was identified in 2 patients (4%). Three patients (5.2%) had distant recurrence at the 3-year mark. Hybrid robotic abdominal dissection with transanal TME for rectal cancer appears to be feasible with comparable surgical outcomes to other traditional approaches.

摘要

腹腔镜直肠癌手术具有一定的技术挑战性。机器人和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)是两种新的方法,旨在提供更好的可视化和解剖效果。本研究旨在结合这两种方法,采用混合手术,并评估其可行性以及患者和肿瘤学结局。我们对 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间接受腹部机器人 TaTME 混合手术治疗直肠癌的患者前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析。记录并分析了患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征和手术结果。共 69 例患者(男性 43 例,女性 26 例)接受了这种混合方法。他们的中位年龄为 58 岁(范围 35-87 岁),平均 BMI 为 24.3kg/m(范围 16.4-44.2)。中位肛缘距离为 5cm(范围 2-9cm)。患者的中位住院时间为 7 天(范围 5-28 天)。并发症发生率为 17.4%(12 例),其中 3 例(4.3%)需要再次手术。TME 质量均为最佳,其中完全(81.2%)或几乎完全(18.8%)。65 例(94.2%)患者行 RO 切除术,4 例(5.8%)患者切缘受累(≤1mm)。中位淋巴结清扫数为 20 枚(范围 6-37 枚)。中位随访 27.7 个月(范围 7-42 个月)后,2 例(4%)患者出现局部复发。3 例(5.2%)患者在 3 年时出现远处复发。对于直肠癌,采用混合机器人腹部解剖与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术是可行的,其手术结果与其他传统方法相当。

相似文献

1
Robotic or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) approach for rectal cancer, how about both? Feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.机器人或经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌,两者皆用如何?来自单中心的可行性和结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01206-7. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.用于直肠癌的混合腹部机器人手术联合传统经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME):单机构的可行性及结果
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01032-y. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).国际多中心前瞻性直肠癌手术审计;手术方法与结果,包括经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20 Suppl 6:33-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.14376.
5
Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5248-5257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by laparoscopic transabdominal approach: A preliminary twenty-case series report.经腹腔镜经腹入路辅助机器人经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:初步二十例系列报告。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
8
Outcomes of a Single Surgeon-Based Transanal-Total Mesorectal Excision (TATME) for Rectal Cancer.基于单外科医生的经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TATME)治疗直肠癌的疗效
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2018 Dec;49(4):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-9989-7.
9
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:超越学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4101-4109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07172-4. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Transanal down-to-up dissection of the distal rectum as a viable approach to achieve total mesorectal excision in laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer near the anus: a study of short- and long-term outcomes of 123 consecutive patients from a single Japanese institution.经肛门由下至上游离远端直肠以实现肛门附近直肠癌腹腔镜保肛手术中全直肠系膜切除术:来自日本单中心的 123 例连续患者的短期和长期结果研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 15;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02826-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined TaTME with SP Robot for Low Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer: rSPa TaTME.经括约肌间入路全直肠系膜切除术联合SP机器人用于直肠癌低位前切除术:rSPa TaTME
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1328. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081328.
2
Comparison of the short-term surgical outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer using a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach alone or supported by a transanal approach.单纯使用机器人辅助经腹入路或联合经肛门入路进行低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的短期手术效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2070-2077. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10730-0. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision.

本文引用的文献

1
Is bridge to surgery stenting a safe alternative to emergency surgery in malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.桥接手术支架置入术是否是恶性结肠梗阻急诊手术的安全替代方法:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6487-3. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
The Risk Factors Affecting Survival in Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan.影响台湾地区结直肠癌患者生存的危险因素。
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Apr;47(4):519-530.
机器人手术联合经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的可行性和安全性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 29;408(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z.
4
Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery.机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的临床安全性和有效性:多家高容量机器人辅助手术机构8年的真实世界经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4175. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174175.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: it's come a long way and here to stay.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:它已经取得了长足的进步并将持续存在。
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;38(4):283-289. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00374.0053. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Postoperative opioid use for patients with chronic pelvic pain undergoing robotic surgery for resection of endometriosis.机器人手术切除子宫内膜异位症的慢性盆腔痛患者术后阿片类药物的使用。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):421-427. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01259-8. Epub 2021 Jun 2.