• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在心血管结局试验中测试的 2 型糖尿病药物的批准:三方比较。

Approvals of type 2 diabetes drugs tested in cardiovascular outcome trials: A tripartite comparison.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.

Department of Medical Informatics, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki-cho, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;87(10):3938-3948. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14814. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.14814
PMID:33704809
Abstract

AIMS

In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a guidance requiring that cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) be conducted for newer hypoglycaemic drugs for type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to examine the decisions by 3 regulatory authorities in response to identical CVOT data.

METHODS

We surveyed ClinicalTrials.gov to identify CVOTs and examined the revision histories of drug labels in databases from the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan.

RESULTS

We selected 14 drugs and corresponding CVOTs, 12 of which were conducted as postmarketing trials. In the USA and the EU, the pre-CVOT indication on all 14 labels was "improvement in glycaemic control". Six drugs showed significant cardiovascular risk reduction, which led to an additional indication regarding reduction of cardiovascular adverse events in the USA, and a change to the EU indication to specify treatment of adults with T2D. The initial indication in Japan, T2D, remained unchanged. Regarding safety, significant increases in heart failure were observed only in the saxagliptin trial. A warning was added to the saxagliptin labels in the EU and Japan, whereas the FDA required a class effect warning to be added to the labels of all 4 dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Regulatory authorities using identical trial data made substantially different decisions regarding both safety and efficacy of hypoglycaemic drugs. The differences in initial indication wording between Japan and the other authorities suggest that trial data and T2D are interpreted differently in these regions.

摘要

目的

2008 年,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布了一项指导意见,要求对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的新型降糖药物进行心血管结局试验(CVOT)。我们旨在研究 3 个监管机构对相同 CVOT 数据的决策。

方法

我们在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了调查,以确定 CVOT,并在 FDA、欧洲药品管理局和日本药品和医疗器械管理局的数据库中检查了药物标签的修订历史。

结果

我们选择了 14 种药物及其对应的 CVOT,其中 12 种是作为上市后试验进行的。在美国和欧盟,所有 14 个标签的 CVOT 前适应症都是“改善血糖控制”。6 种药物显示出显著的心血管风险降低,这导致在美国增加了减少心血管不良事件的适应症,并将欧盟的适应症更改为专门治疗 T2D 的成年人。日本的初始适应症 T2D 保持不变。关于安全性,只有在沙格列汀试验中观察到心力衰竭显著增加。在欧盟和日本,沙格列汀标签上添加了警告,而 FDA 要求在所有 4 种二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的标签上添加类效应警告。

结论

使用相同试验数据的监管机构在降糖药物的安全性和疗效方面做出了截然不同的决定。日本和其他当局之间初始适应症措辞的差异表明,这些地区对试验数据和 T2D 的解释不同。

相似文献

1
Approvals of type 2 diabetes drugs tested in cardiovascular outcome trials: A tripartite comparison.在心血管结局试验中测试的 2 型糖尿病药物的批准:三方比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;87(10):3938-3948. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14814. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of DPP-4 Inhibitors.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的疗效与心血管安全性
Curr Drug Saf. 2021;16(2):154-164. doi: 10.2174/1574886315999200819150544.
3
Implications of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in Type 2 Diabetes for Primary Care.
J Fam Pract. 2018 Jun;67(6 suppl):S35-S40.
4
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and heart failure: Analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与心力衰竭:提交至美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的自发报告分析
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 May;26(5):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
The kidney and cardiovascular outcome trials.肾脏和心血管结局试验。
J Diabetes. 2018 Feb;10(2):88-89. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12616.
6
Impact of Regulatory Guidance on Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk of New Glucose-Lowering Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.评估新型降糖疗法治疗 2 型糖尿病心血管风险的监管指导意见的影响:经验教训与未来方向。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 10;141(10):843-862. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041022. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Generalizability of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials enrollment criteria to the US type 2 diabetes population.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂心血管结局试验纳入标准对美国 2 型糖尿病人群的普遍性。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Apr;24(8 Suppl):S146-S155.
8
A comprehensive review of the FDA-approved labels of diabetes drugs: Indications, safety, and emerging cardiovascular safety data.对 FDA 批准的糖尿病药物标签的全面回顾:适应证、安全性和新兴的心血管安全性数据。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Dec;31(12):1719-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
9
Rationales of delay and difference in regulatory review by Japan, the USA and Europe among new drugs first approved in Japan.日本、美国和欧洲对日本首次批准的新药在监管审查中延迟和差异的理由。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;87(8):3279-3291. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14749. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Newer Glucose-Lowering Drugs Added to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.新型降糖药物与二甲双胍联合治疗 2 型糖尿病的心血管疗效的性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e012940. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012940. Epub 2020 Jan 4.