Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248391. eCollection 2021.
While the health-related benefits of contraceptive use for women are well documented, potential social benefits, including enabling women's employment, have not been well researched. We examine the relationship between contraceptive use and women's employment in India, a country where both factors have remained relatively static over the past ten years. We use data from India's 2015-16 National Family Health Survey to test the association between current contraceptive use (none, sterilization, IUD, condom, pill, rhythm method or withdrawal) and current employment status (none, professional, clerical or sales, agricultural, services or production) with multivariable, multinomial regression; variable selection was guided by a directed acyclic graph. More than three-quarters of women in this sample were currently using contraception; sterilization was most common. Women who were sterilized or chose traditional contraception, relative to those not using contraception, were more likely to be employed in the agricultural and production sectors, versus not being employed (sterilization adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.5, p<0.001 for both agricultural and production sectors; rhythm aRRR = 1.5, p = 0.01 for agriculture; withdrawal aRRR = 1.5, p = 0.02 for production). In contrast, women with IUDs, compared to those who not using contraception, were more likely to be employed in the professional sector versus not being employed (aRRR = 1.9, p = 0.01). The associations between current contraceptive use and employment were heterogeneous across methods and sectors, though in no case was contraceptive use significantly associated with lower relative probabilities of employment. Policies designed to support women's access to contraception should consider the sector-specific employment of the populations they target.
虽然避孕对女性健康的益处已有充分的记录,但潜在的社会益处,包括促进女性就业,尚未得到充分研究。我们考察了避孕与女性就业之间的关系,这在过去十年中,印度这两个因素都相对稳定。我们使用印度 2015-16 年国家家庭健康调查的数据,通过多变量多项回归来检验当前避孕使用(无、绝育、宫内节育器、避孕套、避孕药、节律法或退出)与当前就业状况(无、专业、文员或销售、农业、服务或生产)之间的关联;变量选择由有向无环图指导。该样本中超过四分之三的女性目前正在使用避孕措施;绝育最为常见。与未使用避孕措施的女性相比,选择绝育或传统避孕方法的女性更有可能在农业和生产部门就业,而不是不就业(绝育调整后的相对风险比[aRRR] = 1.5,p<0.001,农业和生产部门均如此;节律 aRRR = 1.5,p = 0.01,农业部门;退出 aRRR = 1.5,p = 0.02,生产部门)。相比之下,与未使用避孕措施的女性相比,使用宫内节育器的女性更有可能在专业部门就业,而不是不就业(aRRR = 1.9,p = 0.01)。当前避孕使用与就业之间的关联因方法和部门而异,但在任何情况下,避孕使用与就业的相对概率降低均无显著关联。旨在支持女性获得避孕的政策应考虑到目标人群在特定部门的就业情况。