Suppr超能文献

远程提供开放性安慰剂对照 - 变应性鼻炎的随机对照试验。

Providing open-label placebos remotely-A randomized controlled trial in allergic rhinitis.

机构信息

Pain and Psychotherapy Research Lab, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248367. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Placebos can reduce physical symptoms even when provided with full honesty and disclosure. Yet, the precise mechanisms underlying the effects of "open-label placebos" (OLPs) have remained subject of debate. Furthermore, it is unclear whether OLPs are similarly effective when provided remotely, as is sometimes required e.g. in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

In a randomized-controlled trial, we examined the effects of OLP plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone on symptom reduction in people with allergic rhinitis (N = 54) over the course of two weeks. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, OLP was provided remotely (i.e. sent via postal service). To investigate the potential influence of the clinical encounter on the effects of OLP, we manipulated the perception of the virtual clinical encounter, both with respect to verbal and nonverbal factors (augmented vs. limited encounter).

RESULTS

The results of the manipulation check confirmed that the augmented clinical encounter was evaluated more positively than the limited encounter, in terms of perceived warmth of the provider. Participants from all treatment groups showed significant symptom reduction from baseline to two weeks later, but OLP had no incremental effect over TAU. Participants benefitted more from OLP when they did not take any other medication against allergic symptoms than when taking medication on demand. When controlling for baseline symptoms, a significant treatment by encounter interaction was found, pointing to greater symptom improvement in the OLP group when the encounter was augmented, whereas the control group improved more when the encounter was limited.

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrates that providing OLP and enhancing the encounter remotely is possible, but their effectiveness might be lower in comparison to previous studies relying on physical patient-provider interaction. The study raises questions for future research about the potential and challenges of remote placebo studies and virtual clinical encounters. The study has been registered as a clinical trial at ISRCTN (record number: 39018).

摘要

背景

即使完全坦诚和披露,安慰剂也可以减轻身体症状。然而,“开放性安慰剂”(OLP)效果的确切机制仍存在争议。此外,当远程提供时,OLP 是否同样有效尚不清楚,例如在当前的 COVID-19 大流行中。

方法

在一项随机对照试验中,我们研究了 OLP 加常规治疗(TAU)与仅 TAU 相比对过敏性鼻炎患者(N = 54)在两周内减轻症状的效果。由于 COVID-19 大流行,OLP 是通过远程(即通过邮寄)提供的。为了研究虚拟临床接触对 OLP 效果的潜在影响,我们操纵了对虚拟临床接触的感知,包括言语和非言语因素(增强型和限制型接触)。

结果

操纵检查的结果证实,与限制型接触相比,增强型临床接触在提供者的温暖感知方面得到了更积极的评价。所有治疗组的参与者在从基线到两周后都显示出显著的症状减轻,但 OLP 并没有比 TAU 产生额外的效果。当参与者没有服用任何其他治疗过敏症状的药物时,他们从 OLP 中获益更多,而当他们按需服用药物时则获益较少。当控制基线症状时,发现了一个显著的治疗与接触的相互作用,表明在接触增强时 OLP 组的症状改善更大,而对照组在接触受限时改善更大。

讨论

该研究表明,远程提供 OLP 和增强接触是可能的,但与以前依赖于物理医患互动的研究相比,它们的效果可能较低。该研究为未来关于远程安慰剂研究和虚拟临床接触的潜力和挑战的研究提出了问题。该研究已在 ISRCTN 注册(记录号:39018)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446d/7951912/4a6d089b0d90/pone.0248367.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验