Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Integrative Center for Aging Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug;102(8):1568-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Describe who is able to return to driving (RTD) after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), when this occurs, who maintains that activity, and the association with outcome.
Cross-sectional descriptive study.
Eight follow-up sites of the TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) program.
618 participants enrolled in the TBIMS and 88 caregivers (N=706).
Not applicable.
A survey was completed from 1-30 years postinjury focusing on RTD. Descriptors included demographic information, injury severity, and current employment status. Outcome was assessed at the time of the interview, including depression, quality of life, functional status, and community participation.
Of 706 respondents, 78% (N = 552) RTD, but 14% (N = 77) of these did not maintain that activity. Of those who RTD, 43% (N = 192) did so within 6 months of the injury and 92% did so within 24 months postinjury. The percentage of people driving after TBI did not differ significantly based on age at time of injury or follow-up. There were significant differences between drivers and nondrivers with respect to severity of injury, seizures, race, education, employment, rural vs urban setting, marital status, and family income. We performed a multivariate logistic regression to examine the association between driving status and demographic variables, adjusting for other variables in the model. The strongest associations were with current employment, family income, race, seizures, and severity of injury. Driving was associated with greater community participation, better functional outcomes, fewer symptoms of depression, and greater life satisfaction.
Over a span of 30 years, three-quarters of people experiencing moderate-to-severe TBI return to driving a personal vehicle, although not everyone maintains this activity. Employment, race, family income, and seizures are strongly associated with RTD.
描述哪些人能够在中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后恢复驾驶(RTD),何时发生这种情况,哪些人维持这种活动,以及与结果的关系。
横断面描述性研究。
TBI 模型系统(TBIMS)计划的八个随访地点。
618 名参加 TBIMS 的参与者和 88 名照顾者(N=706)。
不适用。
一项从损伤后 1-30 年进行的调查,重点关注 RTD。描述符包括人口统计学信息、损伤严重程度和当前就业状况。结果在访谈时进行评估,包括抑郁、生活质量、功能状态和社区参与度。
在 706 名应答者中,78%(N=552)RTD,但其中 14%(N=77)未维持该活动。在 RTD 的人中,43%(N=192)在损伤后 6 个月内进行,92%在损伤后 24 个月内进行。根据受伤时和随访时的年龄,RTD 的人数没有显著差异。在严重程度、癫痫发作、种族、教育、就业、农村与城市环境、婚姻状况和家庭收入方面,驾驶员和非驾驶员之间存在显著差异。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以检查驾驶状态与人口统计学变量之间的关联,并调整了模型中的其他变量。最强的关联是与当前就业、家庭收入、种族、癫痫发作和损伤严重程度。驾驶与更大的社区参与度、更好的功能结果、更少的抑郁症状和更高的生活满意度相关。
在 30 年的时间里,有四分之三经历中度至重度 TBI 的人恢复了驾驶私人车辆的能力,尽管并非所有人都维持这种活动。就业、种族、家庭收入和癫痫发作与 RTD 密切相关。