Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Appetite. 2021 Jul 1;162:105194. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105194. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Elevated consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) contributes to overweight and obesity. Automatic action tendencies like an approach bias might promote the consumption of SSBs. We investigated whether an Approach-Avoidance Training (AAT) reduces this approach bias and related behaviors like craving for and consumption of SSBs. Fifty-six healthy participants, with a self-reported SSB consumption of at least 330 ml per day, were randomized to 6 sessions of real or sham AAT. In the real AAT condition, participants were trained to react with avoidance movements to pictures of SSBs in an implicit learning paradigm (i.e. participants were instructed to respond to a task-irrelevant feature), whereas in the sham AAT condition the same pictures were used but no systematic (avoidance) reaction was trained. Approach bias, craving for SSB and SSB intake in a bogus taste test were assessed. Real AAT was not superior to sham AAT in any outcome measure. AAT in its current form and as a stand-alone intervention does not appear to be effective in reducing SSB consumption.
摄入过多的含糖饮料(SSB)会导致超重和肥胖。像趋近偏差这样的自动行为倾向可能会促进 SSB 的消费。我们研究了趋近回避训练(AAT)是否可以减少这种趋近偏差以及与 SSB 相关的行为,如对 SSB 的渴望和消费。56 名健康参与者,自我报告的 SSB 摄入量至少为 330ml/天,被随机分配到 6 次真实或假 AAT 疗程中。在真实的 AAT 条件下,参与者在一个内隐学习范式中被训练对 SSB 的图片做出回避动作(即,参与者被指示对一个与任务无关的特征做出反应),而在假 AAT 条件下,使用了相同的图片,但没有进行系统的(回避)反应训练。评估了趋近偏差、对 SSB 的渴望和在虚假味觉测试中的 SSB 摄入量。在任何结果衡量标准上,真实的 AAT 都不比假 AAT 优越。目前形式的 AAT 作为一种独立的干预措施,似乎不能有效地减少 SSB 的摄入。