Department of Neurosurgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, 26426, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, 26426, Republic of Korea.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;203:106589. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106589. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a major treatment option for carotid artery stenosis, and a recognized alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, CAS-related hemodynamic instability occurs frequently and is a known major risk factor of associated complications. This study was undertaken to identify the risk factors of hemodynamic instability associated with CAS.
We analyzed the medical records of 128 patients with carotid artery stenosis treated by CAS at our institution from 2014 to 2019 to identify the risk factors of hemodynamic instability after CAS. In addition, the incidences of hemodynamic instability, including bradycardia and hypotension, during and after the procedure were investigated.
Overall, periprocedural bradycardia requiring atropine occurred in 18 (14.1 %) of the 128 study subjects, and postprocedural persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors occurred in 15 (11.7 %). Risk-adjusted analysis showed carotid bulb involvement of a stenotic lesion was an independent risk factor of periprocedural bradycardia (OR 4.25, 95 % CI 1.34-13.40) and postprocedural persistent hypotension (OR 7.36, 95 % CI 1.86-29.12). However, though a preoperative regimen of ≥ 2 antihypertensives was found to be an independent protective factor against postprocedural persistent hypotension (OR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.04-0.81), it was not associated with periprocedural bradycardia (OR 0.37 95 % CI 0.08-1.60).
The risk of hemodynamic instability development is greater when a carotid stenotic lesion involves the carotid bulb, which cautions that careful evaluation is necessary. In addition, the receipt of antihypertensive regimens before CAS had a protective effect on persistent hypotension after CAS, but did not affect bradycardia.
颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是治疗颈动脉狭窄的主要方法,也是公认的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)替代方法。然而,CAS 相关的血流动力学不稳定经常发生,是相关并发症的一个已知主要危险因素。本研究旨在确定与 CAS 相关的血流动力学不稳定的危险因素。
我们分析了 2014 年至 2019 年在我院接受 CAS 治疗的 128 例颈动脉狭窄患者的病历,以确定 CAS 后血流动力学不稳定的危险因素。此外,还调查了术中及术后血流动力学不稳定(包括心动过缓和低血压)的发生率。
总体而言,128 例研究对象中,18 例(14.1%)发生围手术期需要阿托品的心动过缓,15 例(11.7%)发生术后持续低血压需要血管加压药。风险调整分析显示,狭窄病变的颈动脉窦受累是围手术期心动过缓(OR 4.25,95%CI 1.34-13.40)和术后持续低血压(OR 7.36,95%CI 1.86-29.12)的独立危险因素。然而,尽管术前使用≥2 种降压药被认为是术后持续低血压的独立保护因素(OR 0.17,95%CI 0.04-0.81),但与围手术期心动过缓无关(OR 0.37,95%CI 0.08-1.60)。
当颈动脉狭窄病变累及颈动脉窦时,发生血流动力学不稳定的风险更大,这提醒我们需要进行仔细的评估。此外,CAS 前接受降压方案治疗对 CAS 后持续低血压有保护作用,但不会影响心动过缓。