Sun Q, Wang B, Zhu C J, Mou F J, Yin Z Y, Wang P P, Chen X N, Chen R J, Liu Y, Li F, Tao L
Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 24;49(3):250-256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200902-00698.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with domestic prostheses in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study was a prospective single-center non-randomized controlled study. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS), who underwent TAVR with domestic prostheses at the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2016 to April 2020 were consecutively included in our study. Patients were divided into BAV group and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) group according to the aortic valve morphology. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the primary endpoint was one-month all-cause mortality. A total of 100 patients aged (69.8±8.9) years were enrolled, including 71 (71%) males. There were 51 cases in BAV group and 49 cases in TAV group. Compared with TAV group, patient in the BAV group was younger ((67.1±8.6) years vs. (72.7±8.4) years, =0.002) and had larger ascending aortic diameter at proximal part ((39.7±5.7) mm vs. (36.0±4.2) mm, <0.001), lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score (3.1 (1.9, 5.4) % vs. 5.9 (2.6, 12.3) %, 0.002). In BAV group and TAV group, the incidence of 2nd prosthesis implantation was 15.7% (8/51) and 18.4% (9/49) (=0.721), the incidence of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation was 2.0% (1/51) and 0 (=1.000), the rate of device success was 82.4% (42/51) and 81.6% (40/49) (=0.925), respectively. One-month all-cause mortality was 2.0% (1/51) and 10.2% (5/49) (=0.108), respectively. Echocardiography showed that postprocedural mean pressure gradient (PGmean) was higher in the BAV group (13.0 (10.0, 16.0) mmHg vs. 9.0 (7.0, 14.0) mmHg, =0.003) (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), but the PGmean decrease post procedure as compared with that before TAVR was similar between the two groups ((36.7±16.6) mmHg vs. (36.2±17.5) mmHg, =0.893). Favorable safety and efficacy are evidenced in patients with severely stenotic BAV undergoing TAVR with domestic prostheses.
评估国产人工瓣膜经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗重度狭窄二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)患者的安全性和有效性。本研究为前瞻性单中心非随机对照研究。2016年1月至2020年4月在空军军医大学第一附属医院接受国产人工瓣膜TAVR治疗的有症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者连续纳入本研究。根据主动脉瓣形态将患者分为BAV组和三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)组。比较两组的基线特征、手术结果,主要终点为1个月全因死亡率。共纳入100例年龄(69.8±8.9)岁的患者,其中男性71例(71%)。BAV组51例,TAV组49例。与TAV组相比,BAV组患者年龄更小((67.1±8.6)岁 vs. (72.7±8.4)岁,P =0.002),升主动脉近端直径更大((39.7±5.7)mm vs. (36.0±4.2)mm,P<0.001),胸外科医师协会预测死亡率(STS - PROM)评分更低(3.1(1.9,5.4)% vs. 5.9(2.6,12.3)%,P =0.002)。BAV组和TAV组二次人工瓣膜植入发生率分别为15.7%(8/51)和18.4%(9/49)(P =0.721),中重度瓣周反流发生率分别为2.0%(1/51)和0(P =1.000),手术成功率分别为82.4%(42/51)和81.6%(40/49)(P =0.925)。1个月全因死亡率分别为2.0%(1/51)和10.2%(5/49)(P =0.108)。超声心动图显示,BAV组术后平均压力阶差(PGmean)更高(13.0(10.0,16.0)mmHg vs. 9.0(7.0,14.0)mmHg,P =0.003)(1 mmHg =0.133 kPa),但两组术后PGmean较TAVR术前的下降幅度相似((36.7±16.6)mmHg vs. (36.2±17.5)mmHg,P =0.893)。接受国产人工瓣膜TAVR治疗的重度狭窄BAV患者显示出良好的安全性和有效性。