Suppr超能文献

评估印度尼西亚登革热和 COVID-19 抗体快速诊断检测的交叉反应性。

Assessment of dengue and COVID-19 antibody rapid diagnostic tests cross-reactivity in Indonesia.

机构信息

Dengue Research Unit, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Ministry of Research and Technology/National Agency for Research and Innovation of the Republic Indonesia, Jl. Diponegoro 69, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali, 80235, Indonesia.

出版信息

Virol J. 2021 Mar 11;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01522-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains ongoing around the world, including in areas where dengue is endemic. Dengue and COVID-19, to some extent, have similar clinical and laboratory features, which can lead to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment and patient's isolation. The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) is easy and convenient for fast diagnosis, however there may be issues with cross-reactivity with antibodies for other pathogens.

METHODS

We assessed the possibility of cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and dengue antibodies by: (1) testing five brands of COVID-19 IgG / IgM RDTs on 60 RT-PCR-confirmed dengue samples; (2) testing 95 RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 samples on dengue RDT; and (3) testing samples positive for COVID-19 IgG and/or IgM on dengue RDT.

RESULTS

We observed a high specificity across all five brands of COVID-19 RDTs, ranging from 98.3 to 100%. Out of the confirmed COVID-19 samples, one patient tested positive for dengue IgM only, another tested positive for dengue IgG only. One patient tested positive for dengue IgG, IgM, and NS1, suggesting a co-infection. In COVID-19 IgG and/or IgM samples, 6.3% of COVID-19 IgG-positive samples also tested positive for dengue IgG, while 21.1% of COVID-19 IgM-positive samples also tested positive for dengue IgG.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high specificity of the COVID-19 RDT, we observed cross-reactions and false-positive results between dengue and COVID-19. Dengue and COVID-19 co-infection was also found. Health practitioners in dengue endemic areas should be careful when using antibody RDT for the diagnosis of dengue during the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid misdiagnosis.

摘要

背景

新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行仍在全球范围内持续,包括登革热流行地区。登革热和 COVID-19 在某种程度上具有相似的临床和实验室特征,这可能导致误诊、治疗延误和患者隔离。快速诊断测试(RDT)易于使用且方便快速诊断,但可能存在与其他病原体抗体交叉反应的问题。

方法

我们通过以下方法评估 SARS-CoV-2 和登革热抗体之间交叉反应的可能性:(1)用 60 份 RT-PCR 确诊的登革热样本检测五种品牌的 COVID-19 IgG/IgM RDT;(2)用 95 份 RT-PCR 确诊的 COVID-19 样本检测登革热 RDT;(3)用登革热 RDT 检测 COVID-19 IgG 和/或 IgM 阳性样本。

结果

我们观察到五种 COVID-19 RDT 的特异性均很高,范围为 98.3%至 100%。在确诊的 COVID-19 样本中,一名患者仅检测出登革热 IgM 阳性,另一名患者仅检测出登革热 IgG 阳性。一名患者同时检测出登革热 IgG、IgM 和 NS1 阳性,提示合并感染。在 COVID-19 IgG 和/或 IgM 样本中,6.3%的 COVID-19 IgG 阳性样本也检测出登革热 IgG 阳性,而 21.1%的 COVID-19 IgM 阳性样本也检测出登革热 IgG 阳性。

结论

尽管 COVID-19 RDT 的特异性很高,但我们观察到登革热和 COVID-19 之间存在交叉反应和假阳性结果。还发现了登革热和 COVID-19 的合并感染。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,登革热流行地区的卫生保健工作者在使用抗体 RDT 诊断登革热时应谨慎,以避免误诊。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Antibodies as clinical tools for tuberculosis.抗体作为结核病的临床工具。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1278947. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1278947. eCollection 2023.
9
Dengue amid COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的登革热
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;3(2):e0001558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001558. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

8
Covert COVID-19 and false-positive dengue serology in Singapore.新加坡的隐匿性新冠病毒感染与登革热血清学假阳性
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):536. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30158-4. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验