Suppr超能文献

两步法核酸扩增检测技术用于准确诊断结核分枝杆菌复合群。

Development of a two-step nucleic acid amplification test for accurate diagnosis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85160-2.

Abstract

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) remains one of the top 10 leading causes of death globally. The early diagnosis of MTBC can reduce mortality and mitigate disease transmission. However, current nucleic acid amplification diagnostic test methods are generally time-consuming and show suboptimal diagnostic performance, especially in extrapulmonary MTBC samples or acid-fast stain (AFS)-negative cases. Thus, development of an accurate assay for the diagnosis of MTBC is necessary, particularly under the above mentioned conditions. In this study, a single-tube nested real-time PCR assay (N-RTP) was developed and compared with a newly in-house-developed high-sensitivity real-time PCR assay (HS-RTP) using 134 clinical specimens (including 73 pulmonary and 61 extrapulmonary specimens). The amplification efficiency of HS-RTP and N-RTP was 99.8% and 100.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP for the diagnosis of MTBC in these specimens were 97.5% (77/79) versus 94.9% (75/79) and 80.0% (44/55) versus 89.1% (49/55), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP for the diagnosis of MTBC in pulmonary specimens were 96.3% (52/54) versus 96.3% (52/54) and 73.7.0% (14/19) versus 89.5% (17/19), respectively; in extrapulmonary specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP were 100% (25/25) versus 92% (23/25) and 83.3% (30/36) versus 88.9% (32/36), respectively. Among the AFS-negative cases, the sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP were 97.0% (32/33) versus 90.9% (30/33) and 88.0% (44/50) versus 92.0% (46/50), respectively. Overall, the sensitivity of HS-RTP was higher than that of N-RTP, and the performance was not compromised in extrapulmonary specimens and under AFS-negative conditions. In contrast, the specificity of the N-RTP assay was higher than that of the HS-RTP assay in all types of specimens. In conclusion, the HS-RTP assay would be useful for screening patients suspected of exhibiting an MTBC infection due to its higher sensitivity, while the N-RTP assay could be used for confirmation because of its higher specificity. Our results provide a two-step method (screen to confirm) that simultaneously achieves high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MTBC.

摘要

结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTBC)仍然是全球十大主要死亡原因之一。早期诊断 MTBC 可以降低死亡率并减轻疾病传播。然而,目前的核酸扩增诊断测试方法通常耗时较长,并且诊断性能不理想,尤其是在外周性 MTBC 样本或抗酸染色(AFS)阴性病例中。因此,有必要开发一种准确的 MTBC 诊断方法,特别是在上述情况下。在这项研究中,开发了一种单管嵌套实时 PCR 检测(N-RTP),并使用 134 份临床标本(包括 73 份肺标本和 61 份肺外标本)与新开发的高灵敏度实时 PCR 检测(HS-RTP)进行了比较。HS-RTP 和 N-RTP 的扩增效率分别为 99.8%和 100.7%。HS-RTP 和 N-RTP 对这些标本中 MTBC 的诊断灵敏度和特异性分别为 97.5%(77/79)对 94.9%(75/79)和 80.0%(44/55)对 89.1%(49/55)。HS-RTP 和 N-RTP 对肺标本中 MTBC 的诊断灵敏度和特异性分别为 96.3%(52/54)对 96.3%(52/54)和 73.7.0%(14/19)对 89.5%(17/19);在外周性标本中,HS-RTP 和 N-RTP 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 100%(25/25)对 92%(23/25)和 83.3%(30/36)对 88.9%(32/36)。在 AFS 阴性病例中,HS-RTP 和 N-RTP 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 97.0%(32/33)对 90.9%(30/33)和 88.0%(44/50)对 92.0%(46/50)。总的来说,HS-RTP 的灵敏度高于 N-RTP,在外周性标本和 AFS 阴性条件下性能没有受到影响。相比之下,在所有类型的标本中,N-RTP 检测的特异性均高于 HS-RTP 检测。结论,HS-RTP 检测因其较高的灵敏度而有助于筛选疑似 MTBC 感染的患者,而 N-RTP 检测因其较高的特异性而可用于确认。我们的结果提供了一种两步法(筛查至确认),可同时在 MTBC 诊断中实现高灵敏度和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29d0/7952592/160ea95c4931/41598_2021_85160_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验