Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放手术治疗食管胃交界部胃肠道间质瘤:一项倾向评分加权的多中心回顾性队列分析

Laparoscopic open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting.

作者信息

Xiong Wenjun, Xu Yuting, Chen Tao, Feng Xingyu, Zhou Rui, Wan Jin, Li Yong, Li Guoxin, Wang Wei

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.

The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.

出版信息

Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 28;33(1):42-52. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.05.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting (PSW) method.

METHODS

Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. Of these patients, 228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, operative information, and long-term outcomes. PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts.

RESULTS

PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, mitotic rates and recurrence risk. After PSW, 438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic (L group) and 225 open surgery (O group) patients were enrolled. After PSW, the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group: median operative time [interquartile range (IQR)]: 100.0 (64.5-141.5) 149.0 (104.0-197.5) min, P<0.001; median blood loss (IQR): 30.0 (10.0-50.0) 50.0 (20.0-100.0) mL, P=0.002; median time to liquid intake (IQR): 3.0 (2.0-4.0) 4.0 (3.0-5.0) d, P<0.001; median hospital stay (IQR): 6.0 (4.0-8.0) 7.0 (5.0-12.0) d, P<0.001; and postoperative complications (10.3% 22.7%, P=0.001). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2-153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.372, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.072-1.910, P=0.236) or overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.119-1.343, P=0.138) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜切除术在胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)治疗中的应用日益广泛。然而,位于食管胃交界部的GIST(EGJ-GIST)的腹腔镜手术具有手术挑战性。本研究通过倾向评分加权(PSW)方法比较EGJ-GIST的腹腔镜手术与开放手术的疗效。

方法

2006年4月至2018年4月期间,在中国南方四个医疗中心,1824例手术患者被诊断为原发性胃GIST。其中,228例被确定为EGJ-GIST,并对其临床病理特征、手术信息和长期预后进行回顾性分析。采用PSW方法建立平衡队列。

结果

根据手术年份、性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、肿瘤大小、有丝分裂率和复发风险,对腹腔镜手术组和开放手术组进行PSW。PSW后,纳入了438例患者,其中213例为腹腔镜手术组(L组),225例为开放手术组(O组)。PSW后,L组的以下指标优于O组:中位手术时间[四分位数间距(IQR)]:100.0(64.5 - 141.5)对149.0(104.0 - 197.5)分钟,P<0.001;中位失血量(IQR):30.0(10.0 - 50.0)对50.0(20.0 - 100.0)毫升,P = 0.002;开始进食液体的中位时间(IQR):3.0(2.0 - 4.0)对4.0(3.0 - 5.0)天,P<0.001;中位住院时间(IQR):6.0(4.0 - 8.0)对7.0(5.0 - 12.0)天,P<0.001;以及术后并发症(10.3%对22.7%,P = 0.001)。整个队列的中位随访时间为55(范围2 - 153)个月。两组间无复发生存期(RFS)[风险比(HR):0.372,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.072 - 1.910,P = 0.236]或总生存期(OS)(HR:0.400,95%CI:0.119 - 1.343,P = 0.138)的显著差异。

结论

EGJ-GIST的腹腔镜手术具有手术时间短、失血量少、进食液体时间短和住院时间短的优点,且不影响术后结局和长期生存。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验