Suppr超能文献

男性身体意象关注与理想状况测量中基于性取向的项目功能差异

Sexual Orientation-Based Differential Item Functioning in Measures of Body Image Concerns and Ideals among Men.

作者信息

Simone Melissa, Donahue Joseph M, Anderson Lisa M, Anderson Drew

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

University at Albany, State University of New York, Department of Psychology, Albany, NY.

出版信息

Psychol Men Masc. 2021 Jan;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/men0000273. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Abstract

Body image concerns and body ideals are linked with eating disorders and psychological health. Body image and ideals among men differ by sexual orientation, which may influence the utility of common measures of such constructs. The present study used differential item functioning (DIF) analyses to examine whether item endorsement differs as a function of sexual orientation in three commonly used measures of body image concerns and ideals. Participants were sexual minority (n=209) and heterosexual (n=494) men in the United States. Scores on the Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS), Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4), and Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS) were examined. DIF was tested in a three-step regression wherein item scores were predicted by: (1) subscale score, (2) subscale and sexual orientation, and (3) subscale, sexual orientation and their product term. Model fit and variance explain comparisons identified DIF. Δ pseudo R value ≥ .035 from step 1 to 3 signified clinical significant DIF. There was no evidence of clinically significant DIF for the DMS, SATAQ-4, or OBSC. Findings suggest that DMS, SATAQ-4, and OBSC perform similarly for sexual minority and heterosexual men.

摘要

对身体形象的关注和身体理想与饮食失调及心理健康相关。男性的身体形象和理想因性取向而异,这可能会影响此类概念常用测量方法的效用。本研究使用差异项目功能(DIF)分析来检验在三种常用的身体形象关注和理想测量方法中,项目认可是否因性取向而异。参与者为美国的性少数群体男性(n = 209)和异性恋男性(n = 494)。对肌肉发达量表(DMS)、外貌社会文化态度问卷-4(SATAQ-4)和物化身体意识量表(OBCS)的得分进行了检验。DIF在三步回归中进行测试,其中项目得分由以下因素预测:(1)分量表得分,(2)分量表和性取向,以及(3)分量表、性取向及其乘积项。模型拟合和方差解释比较确定了DIF。从步骤1到步骤3的Δ伪R值≥.035表示具有临床显著的DIF。没有证据表明DMS、SATAQ-4或OBSC存在临床显著的DIF。研究结果表明,DMS、SATAQ-4和OBSC在性少数群体男性和异性恋男性中的表现相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验