Erkens Jules, Schulte Michael, Vormann Matthias, Wilsch Anna, Herrmann Christoph S
Department of Psychology, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All," European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Hörzentrum Oldenburg GmbH, Germany.
Neurosci Insights. 2021 Feb 24;16:2633105520988854. doi: 10.1177/2633105520988854. eCollection 2021.
An issue commonly expressed by hearing aid users is a difficulty to understand speech in complex hearing scenarios, that is, when speech is presented together with background noise or in situations with multiple speakers. Conventional hearing aids are already designed with these issues in mind, using beamforming to only enhance sound from a specific direction, but these are limited in solving these issues as they can only modulate incoming sound at the cochlear level. However, evidence exists that age-related hearing loss might partially be caused later in the hearing processes due to brain processes slowing down and becoming less efficient. In this study, we tested whether it would be possible to improve the hearing process at the cortical level by improving neural tracking of speech. The speech envelopes of target sentences were transformed into an electrical signal and stimulated onto elderly participants' cortices using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). We compared 2 different signal to noise ratios (SNRs) with 5 different delays between sound presentation and stimulation ranging from 50 ms to 150 ms, and the differences in effects between elderly normal hearing and elderly hearing impaired participants. When the task was performed at a high SNR, hearing impaired participants appeared to gain more from envelope-tACS compared to when the task was performed at a lower SNR. This was not the case for normal hearing participants. Furthermore, a post-hoc analysis of the different time-lags suggest that elderly were significantly better at a stimulation time-lag of 150 ms when the task was presented at a high SNR. In this paper, we outline why these effects are worth exploring further, and what they tell us about the optimal tACS time-lag.
助听器使用者普遍表达的一个问题是,在复杂的听力场景中难以理解语音,即当语音与背景噪音同时出现或在有多个说话者的情况下。传统助听器在设计时已经考虑到了这些问题,采用波束成形技术仅增强来自特定方向的声音,但这些技术在解决这些问题方面存在局限性,因为它们只能在耳蜗水平调节传入的声音。然而,有证据表明,与年龄相关的听力损失可能部分是由于听力过程后期大脑处理速度减慢和效率降低所致。在这项研究中,我们测试了是否有可能通过改善语音的神经跟踪来在皮层水平改善听力过程。将目标句子的语音包络转换为电信号,并使用经颅交流电刺激(tACS)刺激老年参与者的皮层。我们比较了2种不同的信噪比(SNR)以及声音呈现和刺激之间5种不同的延迟,延迟范围从50毫秒到150毫秒,还比较了老年听力正常参与者和老年听力受损参与者之间的效果差异。当任务在高信噪比下执行时,与在低信噪比下执行任务相比,听力受损的参与者似乎从包络tACS中获益更多。听力正常的参与者则并非如此。此外,对不同时间滞后的事后分析表明,当任务在高信噪比下呈现时,老年人在150毫秒的刺激时间滞后时表现明显更好。在本文中,我们概述了为什么这些效果值得进一步探索,以及它们告诉我们关于最佳tACS时间滞后的哪些信息。