Gao Qiang, Jin Jie, Zhang Zewei, Ma Lianglong, Li Jianhua, Yu Jiangen
Department of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Center, The Childern's Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):2055-2060. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15484. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
To compare the clinical data of sternotomy and left intercostals incision, combined with the literature, to provide the best surgical incision for committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (DCS-VSD).
From July 2016 to July 2020, a total of 117 cases of occlusion surgeries for DCSVSD, which guided by transoesophagel echocardiography (TEE) were completed, including 34 cases with sternotomy incision and 83 cases with left intercostal incision. Statistics and analysis of the operation and follow-up.
A total of 115 cases successfully occluded, the successful rate was 98.29%, and 1 case failed in each group. Pericardial effusion occurred in five children after the drainage device was removed, and the pericardial effusion disappeared after diuretic treatment. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in operation time, occlusion time, thoracotomy time and postoperative hospital stay. All the children recovered and were discharged from the hospital, and were followed-up for 2-30 months after operation.
TEE-guided intercostal DCS-VSD occlusion is safe and effective. There is no statistical difference between two approach with the operation time, chest opening and closing time, occluder placing time, and postoperative hospital staying. At the same time, the surgical incision by intercostal incisionis smaller and the operation invasion is less, it is a surgical approach which worth to develop.
对比胸骨切开术与左肋间切口的临床资料,并结合文献,为动脉下型室间隔缺损(DCS - VSD)提供最佳手术切口。
2016年7月至2020年7月,共完成117例经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下的DCSVSD封堵手术,其中胸骨切开术切口34例,左肋间切口83例。对手术及随访情况进行统计分析。
共115例封堵成功,成功率为98.29%,每组各有1例失败。5例患儿拔除引流装置后出现心包积液,经利尿治疗后心包积液消失。两组在手术时间、封堵时间、开胸时间及术后住院时间方面差异无统计学意义。所有患儿均康复出院,术后随访2 - 30个月。
TEE引导下肋间DCS - VSD封堵术安全有效。两种手术方式在手术时间、开胸及关胸时间、封堵器置入时间和术后住院时间方面差异无统计学意义。同时,肋间切口手术切口小,手术创伤小,是一种值得推广的手术方式。