• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部表情歧义与面部图像质量对面部表情解读偏差的影响不同。

Facial Expression Ambiguity and Face Image Quality Affect Differently on Expression Interpretation Bias.

机构信息

University of Lincoln, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 2021 Apr;50(4):328-342. doi: 10.1177/03010066211000270. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/03010066211000270
PMID:33709837
Abstract

We often show an invariant or comparable recognition performance for perceiving prototypical facial expressions, such as happiness and anger, under different viewing settings. However, it is unclear to what extent the categorisation of ambiguous expressions and associated interpretation bias are invariant in degraded viewing conditions. In this exploratory eye-tracking study, we systematically manipulated both facial expression ambiguity (via morphing happy and angry expressions in different proportions) and face image clarity/quality (via manipulating image resolution) to measure participants' expression categorisation performance, perceived expression intensity, and associated face-viewing gaze distribution. Our analysis revealed that increasing facial expression ambiguity and decreasing face image quality induced the opposite direction of expression interpretation bias (negativity vs. positivity bias, or increased anger vs. increased happiness categorisation), the same direction of deterioration impact on rating expression intensity, and qualitatively different influence on face-viewing gaze allocation (decreased gaze at eyes but increased gaze at mouth vs. stronger central fixation bias). These novel findings suggest that in comparison with prototypical facial expressions, our visual system has less perceptual tolerance in processing ambiguous expressions which are subject to viewing condition-dependent interpretation bias.

摘要

我们经常在不同的观察环境下对典型的面部表情(如快乐和愤怒)表现出不变或可比的识别性能。然而,在退化的观察条件下,模糊表情的分类和相关的解释偏差在多大程度上是不变的,这还不清楚。在这项探索性的眼动追踪研究中,我们系统地操纵了面部表情的模糊性(通过不同比例的变形快乐和愤怒表情)和面部图像的清晰度/质量(通过操纵图像分辨率),以测量参与者的表情分类表现、感知的表情强度,以及相关的面部注视分布。我们的分析表明,增加面部表情的模糊性和降低面部图像的质量会引起表情解释偏差的相反方向(负面偏差与正面偏差,或增加愤怒分类与增加快乐分类),对评定表情强度的影响方向相同,以及对面部注视分配的定性不同的影响(眼睛注视减少,但嘴巴注视增加,或中央注视偏置增强)。这些新发现表明,与典型的面部表情相比,我们的视觉系统在处理易受观察条件影响的模糊表情时,感知容忍度较低,这些表情会产生依赖于观察条件的解释偏差。

相似文献

1
Facial Expression Ambiguity and Face Image Quality Affect Differently on Expression Interpretation Bias.面部表情歧义与面部图像质量对面部表情解读偏差的影响不同。
Perception. 2021 Apr;50(4):328-342. doi: 10.1177/03010066211000270. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Emotion category-modulated interpretation bias in perceiving ambiguous facial expressions.情绪类别调节的歧义面部表情感知解释偏差。
Perception. 2023 Oct;52(10):695-711. doi: 10.1177/03010066231186936. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Expression-dependent susceptibility to face distortions in processing of facial expressions of emotion.在处理面部表情时,表情依赖的对面部变形的易感性。
Vision Res. 2019 Apr;157:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
How does the presence of a surgical face mask impair the perceived intensity of facial emotions?外科口罩对面部情绪感知强度的影响如何?
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262344. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors contributing to individual differences in facial expression categorisation.导致面部表情分类中个体差异的因素。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Feb;32(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1273200. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
6
Size-invariant facial expression categorization and associated gaze allocation within social interaction space.社交互动空间内大小不变的面部表情分类及相关注视分配
Perception. 2013;42(10):1027-42. doi: 10.1068/p7552.
7
Amygdala integrates emotional expression and gaze direction in response to dynamic facial expressions.杏仁核整合了情绪表达和注视方向,以响应动态面部表情。
Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.049. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
8
Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction.情绪表达会调节对注视方向的感知。
Emotion. 2008 Aug;8(4):573-7. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.573.
9
Self-relevance appraisal of gaze direction and dynamic facial expressions: effects on facial electromyographic and autonomic reactions.注视方向和动态面部表情的自我相关性评估:对面部肌电图和自主反应的影响。
Emotion. 2013 Apr;13(2):330-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029892. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Face in profile view reduces perceived facial expression intensity: an eye-tracking study.侧面视角的面部会降低对面部表情强度的感知:一项眼动追踪研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactions between faces and visual context in emotion perception: A meta-analysis.情绪感知中面孔与视觉情境之间的相互作用:一项元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02678-6.
2
Drift-diffusion modeling reveals that masked faces are preconceived as unfriendly.漂移扩散模型揭示,被掩蔽的面孔被预先认为是不友好的。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(1):16982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44162-y.
3
Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity.人类与机器对动态和静态面部表情的识别:典型性、模糊性和复杂性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1221081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221081. eCollection 2023.
4
Emotion category-modulated interpretation bias in perceiving ambiguous facial expressions.情绪类别调节的歧义面部表情感知解释偏差。
Perception. 2023 Oct;52(10):695-711. doi: 10.1177/03010066231186936. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Relationships between Nursing Students' Skill Mastery, Test Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Facial Expressions: A Preliminary Observational Study.护生技能掌握、考试焦虑、自我效能感与面部表情之间的关系:一项初步观察性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;10(2):311. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020311.