Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜再次手术治疗反流手术失败。

Laparoscopic revisional surgery for failed anti-reflux procedures.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:353-360.

Abstract

AIM

Failure ratio of an anti-reflux surgery is 2-17% in adults. After unsuccessful fundoplications, if necessary, revisional surgeries can be performed. Revisional surgeries are technically difficult to perform and require professionally advanced experience. On the other hand, it is still controversial which technique should be used in revisional surgery. The aim of this study is to present our experience with revisional surgical procedures for complications or recurrences after anti-reflux surgeries.

MATERIAL AND METODS

A total of 18 patients, 16 of whom were referred to our clinic from other centers, and who underwent revisional surgery for failed fundoplication between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed RESULTS: Five patients were male and 13 were female. The mean age was 40.3±11.7 years. The most common symptom was the persistence of reflux symptoms (61.2%). Indications for revisional surgery were recurrent hiatal hernia in 10 patients, thightness in 4 patients, mesh migration in 2 patients, mesh migration with recurrent hiatal hernia in 1 patient, and mesh migration with thightness in 1 patient. The mean operative time was 107.2+29.2 minutes. The median hospital stay was 2.9 days (range: 1-6 days). The most common surgical procedure performed was the repair of hiatal crura with mesh, and reconstruction of fundoplication and fixation of neo-fundoplication to the right crus (44.4%). In addition, other surgical procedures performed were takedown of the previous fundoplication (16.6%), takedown of the previous fundoplication and reconstruction of fundoplication (11.1%), cruroplasty and fundoplication with gastric wedge resection (11.1%), removal of the mesh and takedown of the previous fundoplication (5.6%), removal of sutures from the hiatal crura (5.6%), and gastric wedge resection (5.6%). Four patients (27.8%) developed morbidity due to gastric perforation and pleural opening during these procedures. The median follow-up period was 29 months (range: 6-69 months). Two cases (11.1%) who underwent revisional surgery failed, and re-revisional surgery was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Revisionary surgical procedures performed for failed anti-reflux surgery are not limited to re-fundoplication. Different procedures such as takedown of the previous fundoplication, reconstruction of fundoplication, removal of the mesh, removal of the sutures or wedge resection may be necessary. These procedures can successfully be performed laparoscopically by experienced surgeons in well-equipped centers.

KEY WORDS

Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal reflux, Laparoscopy, Revisional Surgery, Antireflux surgery.

摘要

目的

成人抗反流手术后的失败率为 2-17%。如果胃底折叠术失败,必要时可进行修正手术。修正手术在技术上具有挑战性,需要专业的先进经验。另一方面,在修正手术中应该使用哪种技术仍然存在争议。本研究旨在介绍我们在抗反流手术后并发症或复发的修正手术方面的经验。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 2014 年至 2019 年间,因胃底折叠术失败而在我们诊所接受修正手术的 18 名患者的资料,其中 16 名患者来自其他中心。

结果

5 名男性,13 名女性。平均年龄为 40.3±11.7 岁。最常见的症状是反流症状持续存在(61.2%)。修正手术的指征为 10 例复发性食管裂孔疝,4 例紧束感,2 例网片移位,1 例网片移位伴食管裂孔疝复发,1 例网片移位伴紧束感。平均手术时间为 107.2+29.2 分钟。中位住院时间为 2.9 天(范围:1-6 天)。最常见的手术是网片修补食管裂孔裂孔、重建胃底折叠术并将新胃底折叠术固定在右骼嵴(44.4%)。此外,还进行了其他手术,如先前胃底折叠术的切除(16.6%)、先前胃底折叠术的切除和重建(11.1%)、胃底折叠术和胃楔形切除术(11.1%)、网片切除和先前胃底折叠术的切除(5.6%)、食管裂孔裂孔处缝线的拆除(5.6%)和胃楔形切除术(5.6%)。有 4 名患者(27.8%)在这些手术中因胃穿孔和胸膜切开而发生并发症。中位随访时间为 29 个月(范围:6-69 个月)。2 例(11.1%)修正手术失败,再次行修正手术。

结论

抗反流手术后失败的修正手术不仅限于再次胃底折叠术。可能需要进行不同的手术,如先前胃底折叠术的切除、胃底折叠术的重建、网片的切除、缝线的拆除或楔形切除术。有经验的外科医生在设备齐全的中心可以成功地进行这些手术。

关键词

胃底折叠术、胃食管反流、腹腔镜、修正手术、抗反流手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验