Cortesi Laura, Domati Federica, Guida Annalisa, Marchi Isabella, Toss Angela, Barbieri Elena, Marcheselli Luigi, Venturelli Marta, Piana Simonetta, Cirilli Claudia, Federico Massimo
Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena 41124, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena 41124, Italy.
Cancer Biol Med. 2021 Mar 12;18(2):470-6. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0481.
As prostate cancer (PrC) shows a mutation rate as high as 30%, it becomes crucial to find the optimal selection criteria for genetic testing. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the mutation rate in families with PrC associated with breast and/or ovarian cancers; secondary aims were to compare the characteristics of families and BRCA-related PrC outcome among and carriers.
Following the Modena criteria for the test, we evaluated the mutation rate in families with breast and/or ovarian cancer with a Gleason score ≥7 PrCs, by testing breast or ovarian cases and inferring the mutation in the prostate cases. The characteristics of families and BRCA-related PrC outcomes were measured using the chi-square (χ) test and Kaplan-Meier methods, respectively.
Among 6,591 families, 580 (8.8%) with a Gleason score ≥ 7 PrCs were identified, of which 332 (57.2%) met the Modena selection criteria for BRCA testing. Overall, 215 breast or ovarian cancer probands (64.8%) were tested, of which 41 resulted positive for and one for genes (19.5%). No statistically significant differences were found in BRCA-related PrC prognosis and in the characteristics of families among BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-tested patients. Ten of 23 (44%) mutations in the gene fell in the prostate cancer cluster region (PCCR) at the 3´ terminal of the 7914 codon.
It appears the Modena criteria are very useful for BRCA testing selection in families with breast and/or ovarian cancer and PrC. A trend toward a worse prognosis has been found in carriers.
由于前列腺癌(PrC)的突变率高达30%,因此找到基因检测的最佳选择标准至关重要。本研究的主要目的是评估与乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌相关的PrC家族中的突变率;次要目的是比较BRCA携带者和非携带者家族的特征以及与BRCA相关的PrC结局。
按照用于BRCA检测的摩德纳标准,我们通过检测乳腺癌或卵巢癌病例并推断前列腺癌病例中的突变,评估了 Gleason评分≥7的PrC且患有乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌家族中的突变率。分别使用卡方(χ)检验和Kaplan-Meier方法测量家族特征和与BRCA相关的PrC结局。
在6591个家族中,鉴定出580个(8.8%)Gleason评分≥7的PrC家族,其中332个(57.2%)符合BRCA检测的摩德纳选择标准。总体而言,对215名乳腺癌或卵巢癌先证者(64.8%)进行了检测,其中41名BRCA1基因检测呈阳性,1名BRCA2基因检测呈阳性(19.5%)。在BRCA1、BRCA2和未检测患者之间,与BRCA相关的PrC预后和家族特征方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。BRCA2基因的23个突变中有10个(44%)位于7914密码子3´末端的前列腺癌簇区域(PCCR)。
摩德纳标准似乎对乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌及PrC家族的BRCA检测选择非常有用。已发现BRCA2携带者有预后较差的趋势。