Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain.
Ther Drug Monit. 2021 Apr 1;43(2):150-200. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000871.
When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.
当吗替麦考酚酸 (MPA) 最初用于免疫抑制治疗时,制造商推荐了固定剂量。对更个性化给药的认识导致了开发方法的出现,这些方法可以根据仅测量几个样本中的药物浓度来估计 MPA 曲线下面积。这种方法在临床常规中是可行的,并已证明在与结果的相关性方面是成功的。然而,对更好的相关性的探索仍在继续,已经发表了许多研究,以寻找可以更好地预测个体患者最佳剂量的生物标志物。由于认为及时对 MPA 个体化治疗的现状进行更新和全面的共识陈述是合适的,因此,在国际治疗药物监测和临床毒理学协会(IATDMCT)成员的倡议下编写了这份报告。所涵盖的主题包括分析标准、包括药代动力学在内的暴露估计方法、药物遗传学的潜在影响、生物标志物的开发以及目标浓度干预的实施的实际方面。对于具有足够证据的选定主题,例如 MPA 曲线下面积的有限采样策略的应用,提出了目标范围的分级建议。为了提供全面的综述,本报告还包括对潜在生物标志物的最新情况的更新,包括那些可能有希望但证据水平较低的生物标志物。鉴于移植领域开发的新型免疫抑制剂药物非常少,在未来几年内,MPA 很可能会继续大规模处方。由于不良反应而停止治疗相对常见,增加了晚期排斥的风险,这可能导致移植物丢失。因此,继续寻找更好地实现 MPA 剂量个体化的创新方法是有必要的。