Viegi G, Paoletti P, Di Pede F, Prediletto R, Carrozzi L, Pistelli G, Giuntini C
CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, University of Pisa, Italy.
Chest. 1988 Jun;93(6):1213-20. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.6.1213.
The usefulness of single breath nitrogen test (SBN2) was evaluated in a cross-sectional epidemiologic survey on a general population sample (n = 3,289) of North Italy. Each subject was submitted to CNR standardized questionnaire and to lung function testing using automated equipment (Hewlett-Packard 47804S). Acceptable closing volume (CV) and slope of alveolar plateau (DN2%/L) tracings were performed by only 1,370 and 1,982 subjects respectively, in comparison with the 2,638 diffusing capacity and the 3,079 forced vital capacity acceptable maneuvers. Prediction equations were computed on normal subjects for CV indices, with the exception of DN2%/L: they were similar to those found in other studies. Significant differences among smoking categories were found for all the SBN2 parameters in males, but only for DN2%/L in females. The latter was also able to distinguish either subjects with airway obstruction from those without it or symptomatic from asymptomatic individuals, but DN2%/L did not give more information than Vmax75, a sensitive index of flow volume curve. Our results suggest that the place of SBN2 in large scale epidemiologic testing has not been justified.
在意大利北部普通人群样本(n = 3289)的横断面流行病学调查中,对单次呼吸氮试验(SBN2)的效用进行了评估。每位受试者均接受了CNR标准化问卷,并使用自动化设备(惠普47804S)进行了肺功能测试。分别仅有1370名和1982名受试者获得了可接受的闭合气量(CV)和肺泡平台斜率(DN2%/L)描记图,与之相比,有2638名受试者获得了可接受的弥散量测定结果,3079名受试者获得了可接受的用力肺活量测定结果。除DN2%/L外,针对正常受试者计算了CV指标的预测方程:这些方程与其他研究中发现的方程相似。在男性中,所有SBN2参数在不同吸烟类别之间均存在显著差异,但在女性中仅DN2%/L存在显著差异。后者也能够区分气道阻塞受试者与非气道阻塞受试者,或有症状个体与无症状个体,但DN2%/L并未比流量容积曲线的敏感指标Vmax75提供更多信息。我们的结果表明,SBN2在大规模流行病学检测中的地位尚未得到确证。