• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期抗生素预防:单次和 24 小时抗生素剂量在预防全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染方面同样有效。

Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Single and 24-Hour Antibiotic Dosages are Equally Effective at Preventing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.

Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S308-S313. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.037. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.037
PMID:33712358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is used to prevent surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Secondary to a national shortage of cefazolin, patients at our institution began receiving a single preoperative prophylactic antibiotic dose for primary TJA and no 24-hour postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of single-dose antibiotic use versus 24-hour dosing of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of acute PJI and short-term complications after primary TJA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 3317 patients undergoing primary TJA performed from January 2015 to December 2019 identified 554 patients who received a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis during the antibiotic shortage and 2763 patients who received post-TJA 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis before the shortage. Patient records were evaluated for acute PJI, superficial infection, 90-day reoperation, and 90-day complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between single-dose and 24-hour antibiotic groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of acute PJI (0.7% vs 0.2%; P = .301), superficial infection (2.4% vs 1.4%; P = .221), 90-day reoperation (2.1% vs 1.1%; P = .155), and 90-day complications (9.9% vs 7.9%; P = .169) between single and 24-hour antibiotic dose. Post hoc power analysis demonstrated adequate sample size, beta = 93%.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose prophylactic antibiotics did not lead to an increased risk of acute PJI or short-term complications after TJA. Our study suggests that administration of a single antibiotic dose may be safely considered in patients undergoing routine primary TJA.

摘要

背景

围手术期抗生素预防用于预防全关节置换术后(TJA)的手术部位感染和假体周围关节感染(PJI)。由于头孢唑林全国短缺,我院开始为初次 TJA 的患者单次术前预防性使用抗生素,不再进行 24 小时术后抗生素预防。本研究旨在比较单次剂量抗生素与 24 小时剂量预防性抗生素在预防初次 TJA 后急性 PJI 和短期并发症方面的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间进行的 3317 例初次 TJA 患者,确定了 554 例在抗生素短缺期间接受单次术前预防性抗生素治疗的患者和 2763 例在短缺前接受 TJA 后 24 小时抗生素预防的患者。评估患者记录以确定急性 PJI、浅表感染、90 天再手术和 90 天并发症。

结果

单次剂量和 24 小时抗生素组患者特征无显著差异。同样,急性 PJI(0.7%比 0.2%;P=0.301)、浅表感染(2.4%比 1.4%;P=0.221)、90 天再手术(2.1%比 1.1%;P=0.155)和 90 天并发症(9.9%比 7.9%;P=0.169)的发生率也无显著差异。事后功效分析表明样本量充足,β=93%。

结论

单次预防性抗生素治疗并未增加 TJA 后急性 PJI 或短期并发症的风险。我们的研究表明,在接受常规初次 TJA 的患者中,单次给予抗生素可能是安全的。

相似文献

1
Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Single and 24-Hour Antibiotic Dosages are Equally Effective at Preventing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty.围手术期抗生素预防:单次和 24 小时抗生素剂量在预防全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染方面同样有效。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S308-S313. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.037. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single Dose Is as Effective as Multiple Doses.关节置换围手术期抗生素预防:单剂量与多剂量同样有效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):429-437. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00336.
3
Should All Patients Receive Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Defining Its Role in Patients Undergoing Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.所有患者均应接受延长口服抗生素预防治疗吗?在初次全关节置换和无菌性翻修手术患者中定义其作用。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S117-S121.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Dual-Agent Antibiotic Prophylaxis Using a Single Preoperative Vancomycin Dose Effectively Reduces Prosthetic Joint Infection Rates With Minimal Renal Toxicity Risk.使用单次术前万古霉素剂量进行双药联合抗生素预防可有效降低人工关节感染率,且肾毒性风险最小。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S213-S218. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
5
2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin: the value of allergy testing for antibiotic prophylaxis.2019 年约翰·查恩利奖:与使用头孢唑啉以外的抗生素相比,初次全膝关节和髋关节置换术后假体关节感染风险增加:抗生素预防过敏测试的价值。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):9-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1407.R1.
6
Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.延长预防性抗生素用于初次和无菌性翻修全关节置换术:一项荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S476-S487. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Substantially Reduces Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty 90-Day Infection Rate.高风险患者延长口服抗生素预防可显著降低初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术 90 天感染率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):2103-2109. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01485.
8
Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection.非头孢唑林抗生素预防与肘关节假体周围感染的较高发生率相关。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Not so Fast: Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Does Not Reduce 90-Day Infection Rate Following Joint Arthroplasty.不要太快:关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防并不能降低 90 天内的感染率。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S122-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.064. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
10
Cefazolin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Obese Patients Are Frequently Underdosed and at Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.头孢唑林预防全关节置换术:肥胖患者经常剂量不足,且有增加假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3551-3554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
How many doses and what type of antibiotic should be used as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip and knee arthroplasty? A register-based study on 301,204 primary total and hemi- hip and total knee arthroplasties in Norway 2005-2023.在初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中,作为全身抗生素预防应使用多少剂量和何种类型的抗生素?一项基于挪威2005年至2023年301,204例初次全髋关节、半髋关节和全膝关节置换术的登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Mar 4;96:217-225. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43003.
2
Single-Dose Versus Extended Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中单剂量与延长抗生素预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74049. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Two Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Enterobacter Induced Periprosthetic Joint Infection in an Elderly Female: A Case Report.老年女性因肠杆菌属引起的人工关节周围感染行两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术:一例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Nov;14(11):103-109. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i11.4930.
4
Evidence-based Approach for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.预防手术部位感染的循证方法
Hip Pelvis. 2024 Sep 1;36(3):161-167. doi: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.3.161.
5
Oral Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Describing Current Practices.门诊全髋关节和膝关节置换术后口服抗生素预防:描述当前的做法。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):1911-1916.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle.外科手术抗生素预防:一项基于全球证据的综合方案建议。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;13(1):100. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010100.
7
A comparison of the microbiology profile for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty and lower-limb endoprostheses in tumour surgery.膝关节置换术与肿瘤手术中下肢假体周围关节感染的微生物学特征比较。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Aug 8;7(4):177-182. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-177-2022. eCollection 2022.
8
Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following joint replacement surgery: a narrative review.关节置换术后手术部位感染的相关危险因素:一项叙述性综述
Arthroplasty. 2022 May 1;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00113-y.