• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Electronic phenotyping of health outcomes of interest using a linked claims-electronic health record database: Findings from a machine learning pilot project.使用链接的索赔-电子健康记录数据库对感兴趣的健康结果进行电子表型分析:来自机器学习试点项目的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1507-1517. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab036.
2
Applying machine learning approaches for predicting obesity risk using US health administrative claims database.应用机器学习方法,利用美国健康管理数据库预测肥胖风险。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Sep 26;12(5):e004193. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004193.
3
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
4
Claims-Based Algorithms for Identifying Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: A Comparison of Decision Rules and Machine-Learning Approaches.基于索赔的肺动脉高压患者识别算法:决策规则与机器学习方法的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e016648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016648. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Machine learning to identify chronic cough from administrative claims data.机器学习识别行政索赔数据中的慢性咳嗽。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51522-9.
6
Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study.使用自动整理的电子健康记录数据(Pythia)开发和验证机器学习模型以识别高风险手术患者:一项回顾性、单站点研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Using electronic health records to identify candidates for human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis: An application of super learning to risk prediction when the outcome is rare.利用电子健康记录识别人类免疫缺陷病毒暴露前预防的候选者:当结局罕见时,超级学习在风险预测中的应用。
Stat Med. 2020 Oct 15;39(23):3059-3073. doi: 10.1002/sim.8591. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Dynamic ElecTronic hEalth reCord deTection (DETECT) of individuals at risk of a first episode of psychosis: a case-control development and validation study.动态电子健康记录检测(DETECT)对首发精神病风险个体的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e229-e239. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30024-8. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
9
A machine learning-based algorithm to identify U-500R insulin candidates among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in US retrospective databases.基于机器学习的算法,用于从美国回顾性数据库中识别患有 2 型糖尿病的成年人中的 U-500R 胰岛素候选药物。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Mar;40(3):367-375. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2293116. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
10
A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records.一种基于机器学习的通过电子健康记录识别2型糖尿病的框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying AI to Structured Real-World Data for Pharmacovigilance Purposes: Scoping Review.将人工智能应用于结构化真实世界数据以用于药物警戒目的:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 30;26:e57824. doi: 10.2196/57824.
2
Predicting risk of suicidal behavior from insurance claims data vs. linked data from insurance claims and electronic health records.从保险索赔数据与保险索赔和电子健康记录相关联的数据预测自杀行为的风险。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5734. doi: 10.1002/pds.5734. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Scalable and interpretable alternative to chart review for phenotype evaluation using standardized structured data from electronic health records.利用电子健康记录中的标准化结构化数据进行表型评估的可扩展且可解释的图表审查替代方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):119-129. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad202.
4
Classifying Infection Risk Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.小儿心脏手术后感染风险分类。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:1153-1162. eCollection 2022.
5
Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.基于机器学习的电子健康记录表型分析方法:系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):367-381. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac216.
6
The US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System: a national resource for a learning health system.美国食品和药物管理局监测系统:学习型卫生系统的国家资源。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2191-2200. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac153.
7
Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology as a Guarantee of Patient Safety: The Role of the Clinical Pharmacologist.药物警戒与药物流行病学对患者安全的保障作用:临床药理学家的角色
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3552. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123552.
8
"Artificial Intelligence" for Pharmacovigilance: Ready for Prime Time?"人工智能"在药物警戒中的应用:是否已经准备好投入使用?
Drug Saf. 2022 May;45(5):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01157-4. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Broadening the reach of the FDA Sentinel system: A roadmap for integrating electronic health record data in a causal analysis framework.拓展美国食品药品监督管理局哨兵系统的覆盖范围:在因果分析框架中整合电子健康记录数据的路线图。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Dec 20;4(1):170. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00542-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting electronic health records-derived phenotypes to claims data: Lessons learned in using limited clinical data for phenotyping.使源自电子健康记录的表型适应理赔数据:利用有限临床数据进行表型分析的经验教训。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Feb;102:103363. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103363. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
2
Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.机器学习方法预测癌症患者 6 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1915997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997.
3
Advances in Electronic Phenotyping: From Rule-Based Definitions to Machine Learning Models.电子表型分析的进展:从基于规则的定义到机器学习模型
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018 Jul;1:53-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013315. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Can Hyperparameter Tuning Improve the Performance of a Super Learner?: A Case Study.超参数调优能否提高超级学习者的性能?:一项案例研究。
Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):521-531. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001027.
5
The FDA Sentinel Initiative - An Evolving National Resource.美国食品药品监督管理局哨点计划——一项不断发展的国家资源。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2091-2093. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1809643.
6
How to do it: investigate exertional rhabdomyolysis (or not).如何操作:调查(或不调查)劳力性横纹肌溶解症。
Pract Neurol. 2019 Feb;19(1):43-48. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2018-002008. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Rhabdomyolysis: Patterns, Circumstances, and Outcomes of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.横纹肌溶解症:急诊科就诊患者的模式、情况及结局
Ochsner J. 2018 Fall;18(3):215-221. doi: 10.31486/toj.17.0112.
8
Association of aspartate aminotransferase in statin-induced rhabdomyolysis.天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与他汀类药物诱导的横纹肌溶解症的关联。
J Prim Health Care. 2017 Dec;9(4):316-320. doi: 10.1071/HC17051.
9
Rhabdomyolysis with different etiologies in childhood.儿童期不同病因的横纹肌溶解症。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Nov 8;6(4):161-168. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i4.161.
10
Perspectives on Exertional Rhabdomyolysis.运动性横纹肌溶解症的观点。
Sports Med. 2017 Mar;47(Suppl 1):33-49. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0689-z.

使用链接的索赔-电子健康记录数据库对感兴趣的健康结果进行电子表型分析:来自机器学习试点项目的结果。

Electronic phenotyping of health outcomes of interest using a linked claims-electronic health record database: Findings from a machine learning pilot project.

机构信息

Government Health and Human Services, IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1507-1517. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab036.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocab036
PMID:33712852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8279790/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Claims-based algorithms are used in the Food and Drug Administration Sentinel Active Risk Identification and Analysis System to identify occurrences of health outcomes of interest (HOIs) for medical product safety assessment. This project aimed to apply machine learning classification techniques to demonstrate the feasibility of developing a claims-based algorithm to predict an HOI in structured electronic health record (EHR) data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the 2015-2019 IBM MarketScan Explorys Claims-EMR Data Set, linking administrative claims and EHR data at the patient level. We focused on a single HOI, rhabdomyolysis, defined by EHR laboratory test results. Using claims-based predictors, we applied machine learning techniques to predict the HOI: logistic regression, LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), random forests, support vector machines, artificial neural nets, and an ensemble method (Super Learner).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 32 956 patients and 39 499 encounters. Model performance (positive predictive value [PPV], sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve) varied considerably across techniques. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve exceeded 0.80 in most model variations.

DISCUSSION

For the main Food and Drug Administration use case of assessing risk of rhabdomyolysis after drug use, a model with a high PPV is typically preferred. The Super Learner ensemble model without adjustment for class imbalance achieved a PPV of 75.6%, substantially better than a previously used human expert-developed model (PPV = 44.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to use machine learning methods to predict an EHR-derived HOI with claims-based predictors. Modeling strategies can be adapted for intended uses, including surveillance, identification of cases for chart review, and outcomes research.

摘要

目的

基于索赔的算法被用于食品和药物管理局监测主动风险识别和分析系统,以识别医疗产品安全评估中感兴趣的健康结果(HOI)的发生。本项目旨在应用机器学习分类技术,展示开发基于索赔算法预测结构化电子健康记录(EHR)数据中 HOI 的可行性。

材料和方法

我们使用了 2015-2019 年 IBM MarketScan Explorys 索赔-EMR 数据集,在患者水平上链接行政索赔和 EHR 数据。我们专注于单一的 HOI,即肌溶解症,由 EHR 实验室检测结果定义。使用基于索赔的预测因子,我们应用机器学习技术预测 HOI:逻辑回归、LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)、随机森林、支持向量机、人工神经网络和集成方法(Super Learner)。

结果

研究队列包括 32956 名患者和 39499 次就诊。模型性能(阳性预测值[PPV]、敏感性、特异性、接收者操作特征曲线下面积)在不同技术之间差异很大。大多数模型变体的接收者操作特征曲线下面积均超过 0.80。

讨论

对于食品和药物管理局主要使用案例,即在药物使用后评估肌溶解症风险,通常首选具有高 PPV 的模型。未经平衡分类调整的 Super Learner 集成模型的 PPV 为 75.6%,明显优于先前使用的人类专家开发的模型(PPV=44.0%)。

结论

使用机器学习方法基于索赔预测因子预测 EHR 衍生的 HOI 是可行的。建模策略可以根据预期用途进行调整,包括监测、确定病例进行图表审查和结局研究。