Suppr超能文献

伊利扎罗夫韧带牵引术与掌侧锁定钢板治疗 AO 分型 C2/C3 桡骨远端骨折:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。

Ilizarov ligamentotaxis versus volar locked plating in the management of AO type C2/C3 distal radius fractures-a prospective non-randomised comparative trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Prashanthigram, Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, 515134, India.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Sep;106(3):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00704-z. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to compare radiological and functional outcomes of Ilizarov ligamentotaxis and locked volar plating in comminuted intra-articular distal radius fractures (AO type C2/C3) using a non-randomised superiority trial.

METHODS

A total of 72 patients with AO C2/C3 distal radius fractures were allotted into Ilizarov ligamentotaxis (n = 30) and locked volar plating (n = 42) groups based on patient preference. Primary outcome was the ability to achieve and stably maintain acceptable radiological parameters (post-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months), and secondary outcome was functional scoring (at 12 months).

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. All fractures united uneventfully. Plating was superior to Ilizarov in restoring ulnar variance (100% versus 80%, p value 0.004), but Ilizarov was superior to plating in restoring volar tilt (as opposed to neutral tilt, 83.3% versus 47.8%, p value 0.002). Both groups were comparable in restoring radial height, radial inclination and intra-articular reduction and stably maintaining all five parameters over long term. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to mean ulnar variance (plating superior) and volar tilt (Ilizarov superior) at all stages of follow-up, whereas radial height and radial inclination were comparable at all points. There was no significant change of all radiological parameters over a follow-up period. At the end of one year, DASH score was slightly better (not clinically appreciable) in the Ilizarov group (8.47 versus 13.61, p value 0.03), but Gartland and Werley scores were comparable between both groups. Mean duration of external fixation in the Ilizarov group was 43.07 ± 8.94 days. Apart from five cases of pin site infections, there were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Ilizarov ligamentotaxis is a comparable option to locked volar plating in achieving radiological restoration and clinical function in comminuted intra-articular distal radius fractures, AO types C2 and C3. Restoration of ulnar variance needs utmost care while performing Ilizarov ligamentotaxis. Ilizarov comes with the disadvantages of reduced patient preference, pin site infections, need for removal of external fixator and slightly slower return to activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2018/08/015549 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Non-randomised prospective trial.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过非随机优势试验比较伊里扎洛夫韧带固定术和锁定掌侧钢板内固定治疗粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折(AO 分型 C2/C3)的影像学和功能结果。

方法

根据患者意愿,将 72 例 AO C2/C3 型桡骨远端骨折患者分为伊里扎洛夫韧带固定术(n=30)和锁定掌侧钢板内固定术(n=42)组。主要结局是能否获得并稳定维持可接受的影像学参数(术后、6 周、3 个月、12 个月),次要结局是功能评分(12 个月时)。

结果

所有患者均完成研究。所有骨折均愈合良好。钢板在恢复尺侧偏斜(100%比 80%,p 值 0.004)方面优于伊里扎洛夫,但伊里扎洛夫在恢复掌倾角(相对于中立位,83.3%比 47.8%,p 值 0.002)方面优于钢板。两组在恢复桡骨高度、桡骨倾斜度和关节内复位方面均相当,并且在长期随访中稳定维持所有 5 个参数。两组在所有随访阶段的平均尺侧偏斜(钢板组更优)和掌倾角(伊里扎洛夫组更优)方面均存在统计学差异,而桡骨高度和桡骨倾斜度在所有点均相当。在随访期间,所有影像学参数均无明显变化。一年后,伊里扎洛夫组的 DASH 评分(8.47 分)略好(无临床意义),但 Gartland 和 Werley 评分在两组间相当。伊里扎洛夫组外固定器的平均使用时间为 43.07±8.94 天。除 5 例针道感染外,无其他并发症。

结论

伊里扎洛夫韧带固定术在恢复粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折(AO 分型 C2 和 C3)的影像学和临床功能方面与锁定掌侧钢板内固定术相当。在进行伊里扎洛夫韧带固定术时,需要格外注意尺侧偏斜的恢复。伊里扎洛夫存在患者偏好降低、针道感染、需要移除外固定器以及活动恢复稍慢等缺点。

试验注册号

CTRI/2018/08/015549 证据水平:III 级,非随机前瞻性试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验