School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Physiotherapy Department, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Dec;19(4):540-549. doi: 10.1002/msc.1553. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
To summarise the combination of treatments private UK-based physiotherapists use with patients who have low back pain (LBP) and the extent to which the treatments used are consistent with clinical guideline recommendations.
Cross-sectional observational survey.
Data were collected from physiotherapists within private UK-based clinics using an online standardised data collection system to record the treatment they provided for patients who had LBP with/without leg pain. Treatment data were classified into those that are 'recommended', 'not recommended' and had 'no recommendation'.
RESULTS/FINDINGS: Treatment provided to 8003 patients were included in the analyses. Most patients (95.0%) were provided with a 'recommended' treatment. Approximately half of the patients who received 'recommended' treatment were also provided with other treatments that were either 'not recommended' (16.7%), had 'no recommendation' (16.6%) or a combination of both (13.0%). Few patients were provided with only treatments that were 'not recommended' and/or treatment with 'no recommendation' (4.6%).
This study provides insight into the self-reported practice of participating physiotherapists and highlights how they generally adopted a multimodal treatment model for patients with LBP. Consistent with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, most patients received information and advice often in conjunction with exercise and manual therapy. Only a small proportion of patients were provided with treatments that are 'not recommended' and/or treatment that had 'no recommendation'. These findings are useful in documenting the implementation of clinical guidelines given the need for practitioners to balance the best available evidence with patient expectation and preference and to facilitate the therapeutic alliance.
总结英国私人执业物理治疗师为腰痛(LBP)患者联合使用的治疗方法,以及所使用的治疗方法在多大程度上符合临床指南建议。
横断面观察性调查。
使用在线标准化数据收集系统从英国私人诊所的物理治疗师那里收集数据,记录他们为腰痛伴/不伴腿痛的患者提供的治疗。将治疗数据分为“推荐”、“不推荐”和“无推荐”。
结果/发现:纳入了 8003 名患者的治疗数据进行分析。大多数患者(95.0%)接受了“推荐”治疗。约一半接受“推荐”治疗的患者还接受了其他治疗,这些治疗要么是“不推荐”(16.7%),要么是“无推荐”(16.6%),要么是两者的组合(13.0%)。很少有患者仅接受“不推荐”和/或“无推荐”的治疗(4.6%)。
本研究深入了解了参与治疗的物理治疗师的自我报告实践,并强调了他们通常如何为腰痛患者采用多模式治疗模式。与国家卫生与保健卓越研究所指南一致,大多数患者经常接受信息和建议,通常同时结合运动和手法治疗。只有一小部分患者接受了“不推荐”和/或“无推荐”的治疗。这些发现对于记录临床指南的实施很有用,因为从业者需要平衡最佳可用证据与患者的期望和偏好,并促进治疗联盟。