Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, RP Kreder 2805, 3080 Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Argentina.
Int J Parasitol. 2021 Jun;51(7):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Encountering suitable hosts is key for parasite success. A general assumption for disease transmission is that the contact of a parasite with a potential host is driven by the density or relative frequency of hosts. That assumption ignores the potential role of differential host attractiveness for parasites that can drive the encounter of hosts. It has been posited that hosts may be chosen by parasites as a function of their suitability, but the existing literature addressing that hypothesis is still very scarce. In a natural system involving a parasitic Philornis botfly and its multiple bird hosts, there are profound differences in host quality. The Great Kiskadee tolerates and does not invest in resisting the infection, which makes it an optimal host. Alternative hosts are frequently used, but whilst some of them may be good options, others are bad alternatives. Here we examined the host selection processes that drive parasite dynamics in this system with 8 years of data from a longitudinal study under natural conditions. We found that the use of an alternative host was not driven by its density or relative frequency, but instead selection of these hosts was strongly dependent on availability of more suitable hosts. When optimal hosts are plentiful, the parasite tends to ignore alternative ones. As broods of optimal hosts become limited, good alternative hosts are targeted. The parasite chooses bad alternative hosts only when better alternatives are not sufficiently available. These results add evidence from a natural system that some parasites choose their hosts as a function of their profitability, and show that host selection by this parasite is plastic and context-dependent. Such findings could have important implications for the epidemiology of some parasitic and vector-borne infections which should be considered when modelling and managing those diseases. The facultative host selection observed here can be of high relevance for public health, animal husbandry, and biodiversity conservation, because reductions in the richness of hosts might cause humans, domestic animals, or endangered species to become increasingly targeted by parasites that can drive the encounter of hosts.
遇到合适的宿主是寄生虫成功的关键。疾病传播的一个普遍假设是,寄生虫与潜在宿主的接触是由宿主的密度或相对频率驱动的。这种假设忽略了寄生虫对宿主吸引力的潜在作用,而这种吸引力可以驱动宿主的接触。有人假设,寄生虫可能会根据宿主的适宜性选择宿主,但关于这一假设的现有文献仍然非常稀少。在一个涉及寄生 Philornis 蝇及其多种鸟类宿主的自然系统中,宿主质量存在明显差异。大蓝姬鹟容忍并不投资于抵抗感染,这使其成为最佳宿主。替代宿主经常被使用,但尽管其中一些可能是不错的选择,其他的则是糟糕的选择。在这里,我们通过在自然条件下进行的一项纵向研究,利用 8 年的数据来检验驱动该系统寄生虫动态的宿主选择过程。我们发现,替代宿主的使用不是由其密度或相对频率驱动的,而是对这些宿主的选择强烈依赖于更合适宿主的可用性。当最佳宿主充足时,寄生虫往往会忽略替代宿主。随着最佳宿主的雏鸟数量变得有限,好的替代宿主就会成为目标。只有当更好的替代宿主不够充足时,寄生虫才会选择糟糕的替代宿主。这些结果从一个自然系统中提供了证据,证明有些寄生虫会根据宿主的盈利性来选择宿主,并表明这种寄生虫的宿主选择具有可塑性和上下文依赖性。这些发现对于某些寄生虫和媒介传播感染的流行病学可能具有重要意义,在对这些疾病进行建模和管理时应考虑到这些发现。这里观察到的兼性宿主选择可能对公共卫生、畜牧业和生物多样性保护具有重要意义,因为宿主丰富度的减少可能会导致人类、家畜或濒危物种越来越成为可以驱动宿主接触的寄生虫的目标。