• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件序列的视触一致性效应的发展。

The development of visuotactile congruency effects for sequences of events.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jul;207:105094. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105094. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105094
PMID:33714049
Abstract

Sensitivity to the temporal coherence of visual and tactile signals increases perceptual reliability and is evident during infancy. However, it is not clear how, or whether, bidirectional visuotactile interactions change across childhood. Furthermore, no study has explored whether viewing a body modulates how children perceive visuotactile sequences of events. Here, children aged 5-7 years (n = 19), 8 and 9 years (n = 21), and 10-12 years (n = 24) and adults (n = 20) discriminated the number of target events (one or two) in a task-relevant modality (touch or vision) and ignored distractors (one or two) in the opposing modality. While participants performed the task, an image of either a hand or an object was presented. Children aged 5-7 years and 8 and 9 years showed larger crossmodal interference from visual distractors when discriminating tactile targets than the converse. Across age groups, this was strongest when two visual distractors were presented with one tactile target, implying a "fission-like" crossmodal effect (perceiving one event as two events). There was no influence of visual context (viewing a hand or non-hand image) on visuotactile interactions for any age group. Our results suggest robust interference from discontinuous visual information on tactile discrimination of sequences of events during early and middle childhood. These findings are discussed with respect to age-related changes in sensory dominance, selective attention, and multisensory processing.

摘要

视觉和触觉信号的时间连贯性敏感性会提高感知的可靠性,并且在婴儿期就已经很明显。然而,目前尚不清楚双向视触觉相互作用在整个儿童期是如何变化的,或者是否会发生变化。此外,没有研究探讨观看身体是否会改变儿童对视觉触觉事件序列的感知。在这里,年龄在 5-7 岁(n=19)、8 岁和 9 岁(n=21)、10-12 岁(n=24)和成年人(n=20)的儿童在与任务相关的模态(触觉或视觉)中辨别目标事件(一个或两个),并忽略在对立模态中的干扰项(一个或两个)。当参与者执行任务时,会呈现一只手或一个物体的图像。与触觉目标相比,年龄在 5-7 岁和 8 岁和 9 岁的儿童在辨别触觉目标时,来自视觉干扰项的跨模态干扰更大。在所有年龄组中,当呈现两个视觉干扰项和一个触觉目标时,这种情况最为明显,这意味着存在“分裂样”的跨模态效应(将一个事件视为两个事件)。对于任何年龄组,视觉上下文(观看手或非手图像)对视触觉相互作用都没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,在儿童早期和中期,不连续的视觉信息对触觉事件序列的辨别会产生强烈的干扰。这些发现与与年龄相关的感官优势、选择性注意和多感官处理的变化有关。

相似文献

1
The development of visuotactile congruency effects for sequences of events.事件序列的视触一致性效应的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jul;207:105094. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105094. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.通过跨通道一致性任务的表现评估手的图像对视觉触觉交互的选择性影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jan;184(1):31-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1076-z. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
3
Seeing an image of the hand affects performance on a crossmodal congruency task for sequences of events.看到手的图像会影响对事件序列的跨模态一致性任务的表现。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Apr;80:102900. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102900. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.反应冲突、多感官整合以及身体介导的注意对跨通道一致性效应的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):873-887. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4849-4. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
5
Investigating the spatial and temporal modulation of visuotactile interactions in older adults.研究老年人视觉触觉交互的时空调制。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1233-48. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4431-5. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.使用跨通道一致性任务评估身体部位示意图对触觉辨别性能的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Feb;124(2):190-208. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
7
Multisensory Interference in Early Deaf Adults.早期失聪成年人的多感官干扰
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Oct 1;22(4):422-433. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx025.
8
Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?目标-情境关联的跨模态学习:触觉情境何时能预测视觉搜索?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1682-1694. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01907-0.
9
Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.躯体对触觉和二维视觉刺激之间的跨模态干扰效应的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(3):419-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2267-6. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.多感官交互作用随着双手越过身体中线:来自非空间视觉 - 触觉一致性任务的证据。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 10;1077(1):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010. Epub 2006 Feb 17.