Department of Osteopathic Manual Medicine, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK, 74107, USA.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 May;43:101357. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101357. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Limitations of traditional medicine and rising interest in complementary medicine call for a closer look at the potential relevance of manual medicine, specifically osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in children.
To conduct a retrospective observational pilot study of babies who received OMT in the newborn nursery compared to those who did not, by quantifying their outpatient health issues in the first 6 months of life, and to determine the feasibility of further definitive randomized controlled trials of a similar nature.
Retrospective chart review of the first 6 months of life from pediatric clinic records of 58 case-matched pairs of children, half of whom received OMT as part of their routine newborn care by virtue of their physician "call" assignment to the author. The sample from which the case-matched control group was chosen were babies who had received routine allopathic newborn care without OMT. Both groups received their pediatric care in the same academic ambulatory clinic and received no further OMT.
Outpatient paper chart review consisted of tabulation by points of the following variables: mention of spitting/vomiting, gassiness, food intolerance, irritability/sleeplessness, colic suggested or diagnosed, episodes of otitis media, frequency of antibiotics given, frequency of upper respiratory infections, frequency of lower respiratory problems, diarrhea, and rashes, separated by month of visit in which the variable was reported.
Exploratory analysis by Pearson Chi-square yielded a few statistically significant differences between the 2 groups, in favor of the OMT-treated group, including Month 2 food intolerance (Χ = 4.14, P = .04), Month 3 colic suggested (Χ = 4.14, P = .04), Month 5 spitting/vomiting (Χ = 8.59, P = .003), and Month 5 antibiotic usage (Χ = 6.33, P = .012).
Findings point to the need for further research in this area based on the suggestion that OMT given to a newborn can positively affect that baby's short-term and quite possibly long-term health, specifically related to GI complaints and irritability. Other studies would benefit from a variety of methodologic changes, including correlation of timing of administration of OMT with possible symptoms and changes in those symptoms over longer periods of observation, as well as correlation of anatomic osteopathic findings with specific symptoms.
传统医学的局限性和对补充医学的兴趣日益增加,这促使人们更深入地研究手法医学的潜在相关性,特别是整骨治疗(OMT)在儿童中的应用。
通过量化婴儿在生命的前 6 个月中的门诊健康问题,对接受和未接受新生儿病房 OMT 的婴儿进行回顾性观察性试点研究,并确定进一步开展类似性质的明确随机对照试验的可行性。
从儿科诊所记录中回顾了 58 对病例匹配的婴儿的前 6 个月的情况,其中一半的婴儿在接受常规新生儿护理时接受了 OMT,这是由于他们的医生将他们分配给作者而进行的“呼叫”。选择病例匹配对照组的样本是那些接受了常规的顺势疗法新生儿护理而没有接受 OMT 的婴儿。两组均在同一学术门诊诊所接受儿科护理,且不再接受 OMT。
门诊纸质图表回顾包括通过以下变量的点数进行制表:呕吐/吐奶、腹胀、食物不耐受、烦躁/失眠、提示或诊断为绞痛、中耳炎发作、抗生素使用频率、上呼吸道感染频率、下呼吸道问题频率、腹泻和皮疹,按报告变量的就诊月份进行区分。
通过皮尔逊卡方进行探索性分析,两组之间存在一些具有统计学意义的差异,OMT 治疗组更有利,包括第 2 个月的食物不耐受(Χ²=4.14,P=0.04)、第 3 个月的绞痛提示(Χ²=4.14,P=0.04)、第 5 个月的呕吐/吐奶(Χ²=8.59,P=0.003)和第 5 个月的抗生素使用(Χ²=6.33,P=0.012)。
这些发现表明需要在该领域进行进一步的研究,因为 OMT 给予新生儿可能会对婴儿的短期甚至长期健康产生积极影响,特别是与胃肠道问题和烦躁有关。其他研究将受益于各种方法学的改变,包括将 OMT 的给予时间与可能的症状相关联,并在更长的观察期内观察这些症状的变化,以及将解剖学的整骨发现与特定症状相关联。