Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Increased for Hospitals but Not for Surgeons.

BACKGROUND

With increases in total hip arthroplasty procedures the need for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has increased as well. This study aims to analyze the trends in hospital charges and payments relative to corresponding surgeon charges and payments in a Medicare population for rTHA for aseptic revisions, stage 1 and stage 2 revisions.

METHODS

The 5% Medicare sample database was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to 4449 patients undergoing aseptic revision, 517 for stage 1 revision, and 300 for stage 2 revision in between the years 2004 and 2014. Two values were calculated: (1) the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges (CM) and (2) the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments (PM). Year-to-year variation and trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), CM, and PM were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean CCI for aseptic revisions and stage 1 revisions did not significantly change (P < .088 and P < .063). The CCI slightly increased for stage 2 revisions (P < .04). The mean LOS decreased significantly over time in all 3 procedure types. The CM increased by 39% (P < .02) in aseptic revisions, 109% in stage 1 revisions (P < .001) but did not significantly change in stage 2 revisions (P < .877). PM for aseptic revisions increased around 103% (P < .001), 107% for stage 1 revisions (P < .001), and 9.7% for stage 2 revisions (P < .176).

CONCLUSION

Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have increased substantially for THA aseptic revisions, stage 1 revisions, and stage 2 revisions despite stable patient complexity and decreasing LOS.