Department of Quality, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY.
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Oct;49(10):1262-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and hospital reimbursement. A four-year review involving eleven hospitals of the NYC Health + Hospital system was undertaken.
From 2016-2019, infection rates and standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were gathered from National Healthcare Safety Network. The C. difficile testing scheme at each facility was recorded.
For the eleven hospitals, declines in rates of C. difficile infection and SIRs were documented. However, this decline was driven by two hospitals that had high rates of infection in 2016; for the remaining nine hospitals, rates of infection and SIRs were at a plateau. Most hospitals used a testing scheme that fell into the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) category for SIR risk adjustment. Hospitals that used the algorithm glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B immunoassay (EIA) followed by NAAT for discrepant results had significantly lower rates of C. difficile infection but similar SIRs.
For most hospitals in this system, rates of C. difficile remained level. Within the NAAT test categories, SIRs may not correlate with infection rates. Given the controversies regarding testing and calculation of SIRs, alternatives to C. difficile infection should be sought as a hospital quality measurement.
医疗机构获得性艰难梭菌感染与不良临床结局和医院报销有关。对纽约市卫生保健系统的 11 家医院进行了为期四年的回顾性研究。
2016 年至 2019 年,从国家医疗保健安全网络收集感染率和标准化感染比(SIR)。记录每个医疗机构的艰难梭菌检测方案。
在这 11 家医院,艰难梭菌感染率和 SIR 均有下降。然而,这种下降是由 2016 年感染率较高的两家医院推动的;对于其余 9 家医院,感染率和 SIR 处于稳定状态。大多数医院使用的检测方案属于核酸扩增试验(NAAT)类别,用于 SIR 风险调整。对于使用谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和毒素 A/B 免疫测定(EIA),然后对不一致的结果进行 NAAT 的算法的医院,艰难梭菌感染率显著降低,但 SIR 相似。
在该系统的大多数医院中,艰难梭菌感染率保持不变。在 NAAT 检测类别中,SIR 可能与感染率无关。鉴于关于检测和 SIR 计算的争议,应该寻找艰难梭菌感染的替代方法作为医院质量测量指标。