Suppr超能文献

运用诊断管理来降低比率、医疗支出,并准确识别医院获得性感染病例。

Using diagnostic stewardship to reduce rates, healthcare expenditures and accurately identify cases of hospital-onset infection.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Department of Medicine, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):51-56. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.375. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lack of judicious testing can result in the incorrect diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), unnecessary CDI treatment, increased costs and falsely augmented hospital-acquired infection (HAI) rates. We evaluated facility-wide interventions used at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) to reduce healthcare-onset, healthcare-facility-associated CDI (HO-HCFA CDI), including the use of diagnostic stewardship with test ordering criteria.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study to assess the effectiveness of measures implemented to reduce the rate of HO-HCFA CDI at the VASDHS from fiscal year (FY)2015 to FY2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Measures executed in a stepwise fashion included a hand hygiene initiative, prompt isolation of CDI patients, enhanced terminal room cleaning, reduction of fluoroquinolone and proton-pump inhibitor use, laboratory rejection of solid stool samples, and lastly diagnostic stewardship with C. difficile toxin B gene nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) criteria instituted in FY2018.

RESULTS

From FY2015 to FY2018, 127 cases of HO-HCFA CDI were identified. All rate-reducing initiatives resulted in decreased HO-HCFA cases (from 44 to 13; P ≤ .05). However, the number of HO-HCFA cases (34 to 13; P ≤ .05), potential false-positive testing associated with colonization and laxative use (from 11 to 4), hospital days (from 596 to 332), CDI-related hospitalization costs (from $2,780,681 to $1,534,190) and treatment cost (from $7,158 vs $1,476) decreased substantially following the introduction of diagnostic stewardship with test criteria from FY2017 to FY2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiatives to decrease risk for CDI and diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile stool NAAT significantly reduced HO-HCFA CDI rates, detection of potential false-positives associated with laxative use, and lowered healthcare costs. Diagnostic stewardship itself had the most dramatic impact on outcomes observed and served as an effective tool in reducing HO-HCFA CDI rates.

摘要

目的

不合理的检测可能导致艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的误诊、不必要的 CDI 治疗、成本增加和虚假的医院获得性感染(HAI)率增加。我们评估了退伍军人事务部圣地亚哥医疗保健系统(VASDHS)在降低医疗保健相关性、医疗机构相关 CDI(HO-HCFA CDI)方面使用的全院范围的干预措施,包括使用诊断管理和检测订单标准。

设计

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估从 2015 财年到 2018 财年在 VASDHS 实施的降低 HO-HCFA CDI 率的措施的有效性。

干预措施

逐步执行的措施包括手部卫生倡议、及时隔离 CDI 患者、加强终末房间清洁、减少氟喹诺酮类药物和质子泵抑制剂的使用、实验室拒收固体粪便样本,以及最后在 2018 财年实施的艰难梭菌毒素 B 基因核酸扩增检测(NAAT)标准的诊断管理。

结果

从 2015 财年到 2018 财年,确定了 127 例 HO-HCFA CDI 病例。所有降低发病率的举措均导致 HO-HCFA 病例减少(从 44 例降至 13 例;P ≤.05)。然而,HO-HCFA 病例数量(从 34 例降至 13 例;P ≤.05)、与定植和泻药使用相关的潜在假阳性检测(从 11 例降至 4 例)、住院天数(从 596 天降至 332 天)、CDI 相关住院费用(从 2780681 美元降至 1534190 美元)和治疗费用(从 7158 美元降至 1476 美元)在 2017 财年至 2018 财年实施诊断管理和检测标准后大幅下降。

结论

降低 CDI 风险的举措和艰难梭菌粪便 NAAT 的诊断管理显著降低了 HO-HCFA CDI 率,降低了与泻药使用相关的潜在假阳性检测的检出率,并降低了医疗保健成本。诊断管理本身对观察到的结果产生了最显著的影响,并成为降低 HO-HCFA CDI 率的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Using diagnostic stewardship to reduce rates, healthcare expenditures and accurately identify cases of hospital-onset infection.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):51-56. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.375. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Healthcare facility-onset, healthcare facility-associated infection in Veterans with spinal cord injury and disorder.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Sep;43(5):642-652. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1672953. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
6
Chasing the rate: An interrupted time series analysis of interventions targeting reported hospital onset , 2013-2018.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1142-1147. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.247. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing: a quasi-experimental antimicrobial stewardship study.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):269-275. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.336. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
The Effect of Clostridioides difficile Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions on the Diagnosis of Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infections.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Aug;46(8):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Diagnosis of infection and impact of testing.
J Med Microbiol. 2024 Dec;73(12). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001939.
3
Diagnostic stewardship in infectious diseases: a scoping review.
J Med Microbiol. 2024 May;73(5). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001831.
4
Diagnostic stewardship to improve patient outcomes and healthcare-associated infection (HAI) metrics.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;45(4):405-411. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.284. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
6
Diagnostic stewardship to limit repeat plasma cytomegalovirus viral load testing.
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08355-0.
7
Role of diagnostic stewardship in reducing healthcare-facility-onset infections.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 16;3(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.305. eCollection 2023.
8
Trends in facility-level rates of infections in US hospitals, 2019-2020.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;44(2):238-245. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.69. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Assessment of Federal Value-Based Incentive Programs and In-Hospital Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2132114. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32114.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in U.S. Burden of Infection and Outcomes.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1320-1330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910215.
2
Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing: a quasi-experimental antimicrobial stewardship study.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):269-275. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.336. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
3
Evaluation of a best practice alert to reduce unnecessary Clostridium difficile testing following receipt of a laxative.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;92(1):50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):670-680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02463-16. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验