Henschke Claudia I, Yankelevitz David F, Jirapatnakul Artit, Yip Rowena, Reccoppa Vivian, Benjamin Charlene, Llamo Tserling, Williams Angel, Liu Simon, Max Daniel, Aguayo Samuel M, Morales Providencia, Igel Brian J, Abbaszadegan Hamed, Fredricks Peter A, Garcia Daniel P, Permana Paska A, Fawcett Janet, Sultan Samir, Murphy Lorenza A
Mount Sinai Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA.
Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1064-1082. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-761.
Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementation in different healthcare systems, at the Mount Sinai Healthcare System (MSHS) in New York City, and at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PVAHCS) in Phoenix, Arizona. This will illustrate the commonalities and differences of the LS implementation process in two very different health care systems in very different parts of the United States. Underlying the successful implementation of these LS programs was the use of a comprehensive management system, the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) Management System. The collaboration between MSHS and PVAHCS over the past decade led to the ELCAP Management System being gifted by the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation to the PVAHCS, to develop a "VA-ELCAP" version. While there remain challenges and opportunities to continue improving LS and its implementation, there is an increasing realization that most patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual LS can be cured, and that of all the possible risks associated with LS, the greater risk of all is for heavy cigarette smokers not to be screened. We identified 10 critical components in implementing a LS program. We provided the details of each of these components for the two healthcare systems. Most importantly, is that continual re-evaluation of the screening program is needed based on the ongoing quality assurance program and database of the actual screenings. At minimum, there should be an annual review and updating. As early diagnosis of lung cancer must be followed by optimal treatment to be effective, treatment advances for small, early lung cancers diagnosed as a result of screening also need to be assessed and incorporated into the entire screening and treatment program.
即使在那些有积极性、有资源,更重要的是有提供肺癌挽救生命的早期检测、诊断和治疗目标的医疗保健机构中,实施肺部筛查(LS)项目也具有挑战性。我们提供了一个在不同医疗系统中实施LS的案例研究,分别是纽约市的西奈山医疗系统(MSHS)和亚利桑那州凤凰城的凤凰城退伍军人事务医疗系统(PVAHCS)。这将说明在美国两个非常不同地区的截然不同的医疗系统中LS实施过程的共性和差异。这些LS项目成功实施的基础是使用了一个综合管理系统,即早期肺癌行动计划(ELCAP)管理系统。过去十年间,MSHS和PVAHCS之间的合作使得早期诊断和治疗研究基金会将ELCAP管理系统赠予PVAHCS,以开发一个“VA - ELCAP”版本。虽然在持续改进LS及其实施方面仍然存在挑战和机遇,但人们越来越意识到,大多数因年度LS被诊断出肺癌的患者是可以治愈的,而且在与LS相关的所有可能风险中,最大的风险是重度吸烟者不接受筛查。我们确定了实施LS项目的10个关键要素。我们为这两个医疗系统提供了每个要素的详细信息。最重要的是,需要根据正在进行的质量保证项目和实际筛查数据库对筛查项目进行持续重新评估。至少每年应进行一次审查和更新。由于肺癌的早期诊断必须继以最佳治疗才有效,因此对于因筛查而诊断出的小型早期肺癌的治疗进展也需要进行评估,并纳入整个筛查和治疗项目中。