• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating a Clinical Pathway in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Effective in Reducing Complications? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床路径:对减少并发症有效吗?一项倾向得分匹配分析。
Visc Med. 2021 Feb;37(1):70-76. doi: 10.1159/000506718. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
2
Analysis of delayed discharge after day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术延迟出院分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.055. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗良性肿瘤和病变:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1518-1525. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0427. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Early Experience With Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared With Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的早期经验比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Nov;63(11):1500-1510. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001725.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper midline abdominal surgery: comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric surgery and non-gastric surgery using propensity score matching.既往中上腹部手术史患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:胃手术后与非胃手术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1424-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08427-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel.泌尿外科欧洲协会指南特别小组对 Clavien-Dindo 分级系统的验证。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Extensive endometriosis surgery: rASRM and Enzian score independently relate to post-operative complication grade.广泛性子宫内膜异位症手术:rASRM和恩齐安评分与术后并发症分级独立相关。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;301(3):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05425-0. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
[Clavien-Dindo classification and influencing factors analysis of complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy].[腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分类及影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 1;56(11):828-832. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.11.007.
9
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术的随机对照试验结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1482-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6430-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
[Analysis of complications and clinical and pathologic factors in relation to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关并发症及临床病理因素分析]
Rozhl Chir. 2014 Mar;93(3):123-31.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析:引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document.报告实施研究的标准(StaRI):解释和说明文件。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e013318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318.
3
Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.采用倾向评分分析评估外科手术的观察性研究中的报告潜在缺陷与偏倚:一项方法学系统评价
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):901-909. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001797.
4
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
The application of clinical pathways in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Aug;13(4):348-53. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60279-4.
6
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.加强观察性研究在流行病学中的报告 (STROBE):解释和说明。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1500-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery.减轻手术伤害负担:减少手术不良事件干预措施的系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):630-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000371.
8
Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures.前瞻性非随机研究与倾向性评分分析及手术随机对照试验的治疗效果估计比较。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000256.
9
The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review.非技术技能对手术技术表现的影响:系统评价。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):214-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
10
Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a Cochrane review appropriate?我们是否对护理路径的价值得出了错误的结论? Cochrane 综述是否合适?
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Mar;35(1):28-42. doi: 10.1177/0163278711408293. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床路径:对减少并发症有效吗?一项倾向得分匹配分析。

Evaluating a Clinical Pathway in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Effective in Reducing Complications? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

作者信息

Arabacioglu Duygu, Lehn Annette, Herrmann Eva, Albers Benjamin, Hanisch Ernst, Buia Alexander

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe University Frankfurt, Langen, Germany.

Department of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Visc Med. 2021 Feb;37(1):70-76. doi: 10.1159/000506718. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1159/000506718
PMID:33718485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7923876/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care pathways are primarily aimed at decreasing length of hospital stay (LOS) and preventing unnecessary costs while maintaining or improving the quality of care. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is insufficient evidence for proving an impact upon postoperative complications.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, logistic regression was used to calculate a propensity score, and, after carrying out 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, 296 patients were analyzed in both groups with regard to postoperative complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system as a primary aim. In addition, secondary aims were LOS, compliance to care, and deviation from the care pathway with respect to patient discharge. Relative risk of the primary outcome was calculated and compared with the e-value as sensitivity testing approach.

RESULTS

Due to the mandatory part of the care pathway, patient record compliance was 100%. Deviation from the care pathway with respect to the planned patient discharge on postoperative day 2 was noted in 16% of the cases. After adjustment for potential factors, the relative risk when comparing Clavien-Dindo complication grades 0 versus 1-4 is 1.64 (95% CI 0.87-3.11), which did not reach significance ( = 0.127). After matching, LOS lasted 3.69 days without and 3.26 days with the care pathway, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Against the background of already implemented structured standard operation procedures, a care pathway is not able to reduce postoperative complications. Nevertheless, we consider our clinical pathway a highly valuable tool for the interdisciplinary management of patient hospitalization under the supervision of experienced specialized surgeons.

摘要

背景

护理路径主要旨在缩短住院时间(LOS)并防止不必要的费用,同时维持或提高护理质量。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,尚无足够证据证明其对术后并发症有影响。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,采用逻辑回归计算倾向得分,在进行1:1最近邻匹配后,以Clavien-Dindo分类系统为主要目标,对两组中的296例患者的术后并发症进行分析。此外,次要目标包括住院时间、护理依从性以及患者出院时与护理路径的偏差。计算主要结局的相对风险,并与e值进行比较作为敏感性测试方法。

结果

由于护理路径的强制性部分,患者记录的依从性为100%。在16%的病例中,注意到术后第2天计划的患者出院与护理路径存在偏差。在对潜在因素进行调整后,比较Clavien-Dindo并发症0级与1-4级时的相对风险为1.64(95%CI 0.87-3.11),未达到显著性(P = 0.127)。匹配后,无护理路径时住院时间为3.69天,有护理路径时为3.26天。

结论

在已实施结构化标准手术程序的背景下,护理路径无法降低术后并发症。尽管如此,我们认为我们的临床路径是在经验丰富的专科外科医生监督下对患者住院进行跨学科管理的极有价值的工具。