Feld Jonathan, Tremblay Douglas, Dougherty Mikaela, Czaplinska Tina, Sanchez Gillian, Brady Claudia, Kremyanskaya Marina, Bar-Natan Michal, Keyzner Alla, Marcellino Bridget K, Gabrilove Janice, Navada Shyamala C, Silverman Lewis R, El Jamal Siraj M, Mascarenhas John, Shih Alan H
Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Hemasphere. 2021 Mar 9;5(4):e549. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000549. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in combination with venetoclax have been widely adopted as the standard of care for patients who cannot tolerate induction chemotherapy and for patients who have relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients with AML (n = 65) or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 7) who received the combination of HMA and venetoclax at our institution. Outcomes measured included complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Patient mutational profiles and transfusion requirements were also assessed. Of 26 newly diagnosed AML patients, the CR/CRi rate was 53.8%. The median DOR and OS were 6.9 months and not reached, respectively. Of 39 R/R AML patients, the CR/CRi rate was 38.5%. The median DOR and OS were both 8.1 months. Responders to HMA and venetoclax were enriched for , , and mutations, while nonresponders were associated with and mutations. Adaptive resistance was observed through various mechanisms including acquired pathway mutations. Of transfusion-dependent patients, 12.2% and 15.2% achieved red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion independence, respectively, while 44.8% and 35.1% of RBC and platelet transfusion independent patients, respectively, became transfusion dependent. In total 59.1% of patients developed a ≥grade 3 infection and 46.5% neutropenic fever. HMA + venetoclax can lead to impressive response rates with moderately durable remissions and survival. However, the benefits of this combination are diminished by the significant toxicities from infection, persistent cytopenias, and transfusion requirements.
去甲基化药物(HMAs)联合维奈克拉已被广泛用作无法耐受诱导化疗的患者以及复发/难治性(R/R)急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的标准治疗方案。本研究回顾性分析了在我们机构接受HMA与维奈克拉联合治疗的所有AML患者(n = 65)或骨髓增生异常综合征患者(n = 7)的治疗结果。测量的结果包括完全缓解(CR)和伴有血液学不完全恢复的CR(CRi)率、缓解持续时间(DOR)和总生存期(OS)。还评估了患者的突变谱和输血需求。在26例新诊断的AML患者中,CR/CRi率为53.8%。中位DOR和OS分别为6.9个月和未达到。在39例R/R AML患者中,CR/CRi率为38.5%。中位DOR和OS均为8.1个月。对HMA和维奈克拉有反应者富集了 、 和 突变,而无反应者与 和 突变相关。通过包括获得性 通路突变在内的多种机制观察到适应性耐药。在依赖输血的患者中,分别有12.2%和15.2%实现了红细胞(RBC)和血小板输血独立,而RBC和血小板输血独立的患者分别有44.8%和35.1%再次变得依赖输血。共有59.1%的患者发生了≥3级感染,46.5%的患者发生了中性粒细胞减少性发热。HMA + 维奈克拉可导致令人印象深刻的缓解率,缓解期和生存期适度持久。然而,这种联合治疗的益处因感染、持续性血细胞减少和输血需求带来的显著毒性而减弱。