Akhavan Arvin Radfar, Johnson Nicholas J, Friedman Benjamin, Hall Jane, Jablonowski Karl, Hall M Kennedy, Henning Daniel J
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Mar 2;2(2):e12397. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12397. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Presence of ethanol (EtOH) may alter the relationship between blood lactate concentrations and mortality. This study compares lactate-associated mortality risk in the presence and absence of EtOH.
We performed a retrospective cohort study including all patients, age >17 years, presenting from January 2012-December 2018, to an urban, academic emergency department, with a clinically measured lactate. Data were electronically abstracted from the medical record. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Patients were grouped by EtOH test results as follows: 1) present (any EtOH detected), 2) absent (EtOH concentration measured and not detected), or 3) not ordered. Marginal analysis was used to calculated probability of mortality for fixed values of lactate and model covariates.
Of 40,956 adult emergency department patients with measured lactate, we excluded 768 (1.89%) for lactate >10.0 mmol/L, leaving 40,240 for analysis: 4,066 (10.1%) EtOH present, 10,819 (26.9%) EtOH absent, 25,355 (63%) EtOH not ordered. Of these, 1790 (4.4%) had 28-day in-hospital mortality. Marginal probability of mortality calculated for specific lactate values found less risk for EtOH Present patients versus EtOH absent patients at lactate 0.0 mmol/L (0.8% [95%CI: 0.5-1.2%] vs 3.2% [2.8-3.6%]), 2.0 mmol/L (1.5% [1.1-1.9%] vs 4.0% [3.7-4.3%]), 4.0 mmol/L (2.6% [2.2-3.1%] vs 5.0% [4.6-5.4%]), until 6.0 mmol/L (4.5% [3.7-5.4%] vs 6.2% [5.4-7.0%]).
EtOH presence significantly alters lactate-associated mortality risk when lactate <6.0 mmol/L. Emergency department clinicians should interpret these lactate values with caution and consider other data for risk stratification when EtOH is present.
乙醇(EtOH)的存在可能会改变血乳酸浓度与死亡率之间的关系。本研究比较了存在和不存在EtOH时乳酸相关的死亡风险。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2012年1月至2018年12月期间所有年龄>17岁、到一家城市学术急诊科就诊且临床测量了乳酸的患者。数据从病历中电子提取。主要结局是28天院内死亡率。患者按EtOH检测结果分组如下:1)存在(检测到任何EtOH),2)不存在(测量了EtOH浓度且未检测到),或3)未检测。使用边际分析计算固定乳酸值和模型协变量下的死亡概率。
在40956例测量了乳酸的成年急诊科患者中,我们排除了768例(1.89%)乳酸>10.0 mmol/L的患者,剩余40240例用于分析:4066例(10.1%)存在EtOH,10819例(26.9%)不存在EtOH,25355例(63%)未检测EtOH。其中,1790例(4.4%)有28天院内死亡率。针对特定乳酸值计算的边际死亡概率发现,乳酸为0.0 mmol/L时,存在EtOH的患者比不存在EtOH 的患者死亡风险更低(0.8% [95%CI:0.5 - 1.2%] 对3.2% [2.8 - 3.6%]),2.0 mmol/L时(1.5% [1.1 - 1.9%] 对4.0% [3.7 - 4.3%]),4.0 mmol/L时(2.6% [2.2 - 3.1%] 对5.0% [4.6 - 5.4%]),直至6.0 mmol/L时(4.5% [3.7 - 5.4%] 对6.2% [5.4 - 7.0%])。
当乳酸<6.0 mmol/L时,EtOH的存在会显著改变乳酸相关的死亡风险。急诊科临床医生在EtOH存在时应谨慎解读这些乳酸值,并考虑其他数据进行风险分层。