Department of Reproductive Health and Biology, Institute of Primate Research, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Primate Research, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 13;3(3):CD007961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007961.pub3.
This is a updated version of our Cochrane Review published in Issue 6, 2012. Sexually-transmitted infections (STIs) continue to rise worldwide, imposing an enormous morbidity and mortality burden. Effective prevention strategies, including microbicides, are needed to achieve the goals of the World Heath Organization (WHO) global strategy for the prevention and control of these infections.
To determine the effectiveness and safety of topical microbicides for preventing acquisition of STIs, including HIV.
We undertook a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, CLIB, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and reference lists of relevant articles up to August 2020. In addition, we contacted relevant organisations and experts.
We included randomised controlled trials of vaginal microbicides compared to placebo (except for nonoxynol-9 because it is covered in related Cochrane Reviews). Eligible participants were sexually-active non-pregnant, WSM and MSM, who had no laboratory confirmed STIs.
Two review authors independently screened and selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias in duplicate, resolving differences by consensus. We conducted a fixed-effect meta-analysis, stratified by type of microbicide, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
We included eight trials from the earlier version of the review and four new trials, i.e. a total of 12 trials with 32,464 participants (all WSM). We did not find any eligible study that enrolled MSM or reported fungal STI as an outcome. We have no study awaiting assessment. All 12 trials were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, with one having a study site in the USA, and another having a site in India. Vaginal microbicides tested were BufferGel and PRO 2000 (1 trial, 3101 women), Carraguard (1 trial, 6202 women), cellulose sulphate (2 trials, 3069 women), dapivirine (2 trials, 4588 women), PRO 2000 (1 trial, 9385 women), C31G (SAVVY) (2 trials, 4295 women), and tenofovir (3 trials, 4958 women). All microbicides were compared to placebo and all trials had low risk of bias. Dapivirine probably reduces the risk of acquiring HIV infection: risk ratio (RR) 0.71, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.89, I = 0%, 2 trials, 4588 women; moderate-certainty evidence). The other microbicides may result in little to no difference in the risk of acquiring HIV (low-certainty evidence); including tenofovir (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02, cellulose sulphate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.95, BufferGel (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.52), Carraguard (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.11), PRO 2000 (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.14), and SAVVY (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.41). Existing evidence suggests that cellulose sulphate (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.62, 1 trial, 1425 women), and PRO 2000 (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.23) may result in little to no difference in the risk of getting herpes simplex virus type 2 infection (low-certainty evidence). Two studies reported data on tenofovir's effect on this virus. One suggested that tenofovir may reduce the risk (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.82; 224 participants) while the other did not find evidence of an effect (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; 1003 participants). We have not reported the pooled result because of substantial heterogeneity of effect between the two studies (l = 85%). The evidence also suggests that dapivirine (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 4.59), tenofovir (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.78), cellulose sulphate (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.81), and (Carraguard (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.52) may have little or no effect on the risk of acquiring syphilis (low-certainty evidence). In addition, dapivirine (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.07), tenofovir (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.13), cellulose sulphate (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99), BufferGel (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.45), Carraguard (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.12), and PRO 2000 (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.22) may result in little to no difference in the risk of acquiring chlamydia infection (low-certainty evidence). The evidence also suggests that current topical microbicides may not have an effect on the risk of acquiring gonorrhoea, condyloma acuminatum, trichomoniasis, or human papillomavirus infection (low-certainty evidence). Microbicide use in the 12 trials, compared to placebo, did not lead to any difference in adverse event rates. No study reported on acceptability of the intervention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence shows that vaginal dapivirine microbicide probably reduces HIV acquisition in women who have sex with men. Other types of vaginal microbicides have not shown evidence of an effect on acquisition of STIs, including HIV. Further research should continue on the development and testing of new microbicides.
这是我们在 2012 年第 6 期发表的 Cochrane 综述的更新版本。性传播感染(STIs)在全球范围内继续上升,造成了巨大的发病率和死亡率负担。需要有效的预防策略,包括杀微生物剂,以实现世界卫生组织(WHO)全球预防和控制这些感染的目标。
确定局部杀微生物剂预防性传播感染(包括 HIV)的有效性和安全性。
我们全面检索了 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS、CLIB、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov、WHO 国际临床试验注册平台以及相关文章的参考文献,检索截至 2020 年 8 月。此外,我们还联系了相关组织和专家。
我们纳入了比较阴道杀微生物剂与安慰剂的随机对照试验(不包括非诺孕-9,因为它涵盖在相关的 Cochrane 综述中)。合格的参与者是活跃的非怀孕、女性和男男性接触者,他们没有实验室确认的 STIs。
两名综述作者独立筛选和选择研究,提取数据,并以双重方式评估偏倚风险,通过共识解决差异。我们进行了固定效应荟萃分析,按杀微生物剂类型分层,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了本综述早期版本中的 8 项试验和 4 项新试验,即共有 12 项试验,涉及 32464 名参与者(均为女性)。我们没有发现任何符合条件的研究纳入男男性接触者或报告真菌性 STI 作为结局。我们没有研究有待评估。所有 12 项试验均在撒哈拉以南非洲进行,其中一项试验的研究地点在美国,另一项试验的研究地点在印度。试验中测试的阴道杀微生物剂有 BufferGel 和 PRO 2000(1 项试验,3101 名女性)、卡波格(1 项试验,6202 名女性)、纤维素硫酸盐(2 项试验,3069 名女性)、地匹福林(2 项试验,4588 名女性)、PRO 2000(1 项试验,9385 名女性)、C31G(SAVVY)(2 项试验,4295 名女性)和替诺福韦(3 项试验,4958 名女性)。所有杀微生物剂均与安慰剂进行比较,所有试验的偏倚风险均较低。地匹福林可能降低感染艾滋病毒的风险:风险比(RR)0.71,(95%置信区间(CI)0.57 至 0.89,I = 0%,2 项试验,4588 名女性;中等确定性证据)。其他杀微生物剂可能对感染 HIV 的风险没有影响(低确定性证据);包括替诺福韦(RR 0.83,95%CI 0.68 至 1.02,纤维素硫酸盐(RR 1.20,95%CI 0.74 至 1.95)、BufferGel(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.73 至 1.52)、卡波格(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.71 至 1.11)、PRO 2000(RR 0.93,95%CI 0.77 至 1.14)和 SAVVY(RR 1.38,95%CI 0.79 至 2.41)。现有证据表明,纤维素硫酸盐(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.37 至 2.62,1 项试验,1425 名女性)和 PRO 2000(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.73 至 1.23)可能对感染单纯疱疹病毒 2 型感染的风险没有影响(低确定性证据)。两项研究报告了替诺福韦对这种病毒的影响的数据。一项研究表明替诺福韦可能降低风险(RR 0.55,95%CI 0.36 至 0.82;224 名参与者),而另一项研究则没有发现替诺福韦对这种病毒的影响的证据(RR 0.94,95%CI 0.85 至 1.03;1003 名参与者)。我们没有报告汇总结果,因为两项研究之间的效果存在很大的异质性(I² = 85%)。证据还表明,地匹福林(RR 1.70,95%CI 0.63 至 4.59)、替诺福韦(RR 1.27,95%CI 0.58 至 2.78)、纤维素硫酸盐(RR 0.69,95%CI 0.26 至 1.81)和卡波格(RR 1.07,95%CI 0.75 至 1.52)可能对感染梅毒的风险没有影响(低确定性证据)。此外,地匹福林(RR 0.97,95%CI 0.89 至 1.07)、替诺福韦(RR 0.90,95%CI 0.71 至 1.13)、纤维素硫酸盐(RR 0.70,95%CI 0.49 至 0.99)、BufferGel(RR 0.97,95%CI 0.65 至 1.45)、卡波格(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.83 至 1.12)和 PRO 2000(RR 1.01,95%CI 0.84 至 1.22)可能对感染衣原体感染的风险没有影响(低确定性证据)。证据还表明,目前的局部杀微生物剂可能对淋病、尖锐湿疣、滴虫病或人乳头瘤病毒感染的风险没有影响(低确定性证据)。在 12 项试验中,杀微生物剂与安慰剂相比,没有导致不良事件发生率的差异。没有研究报告干预措施的可接受性。
目前的证据表明,阴道地匹福林杀微生物剂可能降低女性与男性发生性关系时感染 HIV 的风险。其他类型的阴道杀微生物剂对性传播感染(包括 HIV)的获得没有证据表明有效果。应继续研究新杀微生物剂的开发和测试。