Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Italy.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;68(2):429-434. doi: 10.1177/00207640211001903. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
Immigrants in Europe appear to be at higher risk of psychiatric coercive interventions. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization poses significant ethical and clinical challenges. Nonetheless, reasons for migration and other risk factors for involuntary treatment were rarely addressed in previous studies. The aims of this study are to clarify whether immigrant patients with acute mental disorders are at higher risk to be involuntarily admitted to hospital and to explore clinical and migratory factors associated with involuntary treatment.
In this cross-sectional matched sample study, we compared the rates of involuntary treatment in a sample of first-generation immigrants admitted in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit of a large metropolitan academic hospital to their age-, gender-, and psychiatric diagnosis-matched native counterparts. Clinical, sociodemographic, and migratory variables were collected. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-expanded (BPRS-E) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale were administered. McNemar test was used for paired categorical variables and a binary logistic regression analysis was performed.
A total of 234 patients were included in the analysis. Involuntary treatment rates were significantly higher in immigrants as compared to their matched natives (32% vs. 24% respectively; < .001). Among immigrants, involuntary hospitalization was found to be more frequent in those patients whose length of stay in Italy was less than 2 years (OR = 4.2, 95% CI [1.4-12.7]).
Recently arrived immigrants appear to be at higher risk of involuntary admission. Since coercive interventions can be traumatic and negatively affect outcomes, strategies to prevent this phenomenon are needed.
欧洲的移民似乎面临更高的精神科强制干预风险。非自愿住院治疗带来了重大的伦理和临床挑战。尽管如此,以前的研究很少涉及移民原因和其他非自愿治疗的风险因素。本研究旨在阐明急性精神障碍的移民患者是否更有可能被非自愿住院,并探讨与非自愿治疗相关的临床和移民因素。
在这项横断面匹配样本研究中,我们将大型大都市学术医院精神科重症监护病房收治的第一代移民患者与年龄、性别和精神诊断相匹配的本地患者的非自愿治疗率进行了比较。收集了临床、社会人口学和移民变量。使用扩展的Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS-E)和 Clinical Global Impression-Severity(CGI-S)量表进行评估。采用 McNemar 检验进行配对分类变量比较,采用二元逻辑回归分析进行分析。
共纳入 234 例患者进行分析。与匹配的本地人相比,移民的非自愿治疗率显著更高(分别为 32%和 24%; < 0.001)。在移民中,与在意大利居住时间少于 2 年的患者相比,非自愿住院的比例更高(OR=4.2,95%CI [1.4-12.7])。
最近抵达的移民似乎更有可能被非自愿住院。由于强制性干预可能会带来创伤并对结果产生负面影响,因此需要制定预防这种现象的策略。