Suppr超能文献

局部进展期胃癌的治疗方法、医院实践模式和多模式治疗的获得作为质量衡量标准。

Treatment approach, hospital practice patterns, and receipt of multimodality therapy as measures of quality for locally advanced gastric cancer.

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;123(8):1724-1735. doi: 10.1002/jso.26460. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate lymphadenectomy (AL) during surgical resection and delivery of multimodality therapy (MMT) are considered important for optimizing oncologic outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches to MMT delivery are considered acceptable treatment strategies. Our goal was to evaluate the association between MMT treatment approach, hospital practice patterns, and survival and to explore whether AL and MMT might represent measures of quality for locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A national cohort study of 5433 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (≥cT2 and/or cN+) treated at 987 hospitals within the National Cancer Database (2006-2015). Patients were categorized as receiving a neoadjuvant therapy (NT) or adjuvant therapy (AT) approach. Patients were also categorized based on receipt of AL (≥15 nodes) and MMT (surgery with any preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative AT). Hospitals were stratified based on the predominant treatment approach and the proportion of patients that achieved performance benchmarks (AL ≥ 80%; MMT ≥ 75%). Multivariable Cox shared frailty modeling was used to evaluate the association with the overall risk of death.

RESULTS

Overall, 54.5% of patients were treated with an AT and 45.6% with an NT approach. Relative to surgery alone, receipt of MMT by either approach was associated with decreased risk of death (NT-hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: [0.65-0.86]; AT-HR: 0.80 [0.71-0.90]). Relative to care at mixed pattern hospitals, care at predominantly AT hospitals was associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 1.28 [1.12-1.47]). Relative to patients whose care achieved no quality measures, AL (HR: 0.75, [0.67-0.82]) and MMT (HR: 0.68 [0.60-0.76]) were each associated with a reduced risk of death. Receipt of both measures was associated with an even greater reduction (HR: 0.47 [0.40-0.56]). Hospital performance on AL, MMT, or both measures was not associated with the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Because over half of patients are treated with surgery first (many having surgery alone) and care at hospitals favoring a surgery first approach is associated with worse outcomes, quality improvement (QI) efforts should focus on increasing the use of NT strategies. Furthermore, delivery of AL and MMT together may represent an actionable, generalizable target for gastric cancer QI efforts because it improves survival and is unrelated to the context in which care is provided.

摘要

背景

在手术切除和接受多模式治疗(MMT)期间进行充分的淋巴结清扫(AL)被认为是优化局部晚期胃癌患者肿瘤学结果的重要因素。新辅助和辅助 MMT 给药方法都被认为是可接受的治疗策略。我们的目标是评估 MMT 治疗方法、医院实践模式与生存之间的关系,并探讨 AL 和 MMT 是否可以作为局部晚期胃癌的质量衡量标准。

方法

本研究对国家癌症数据库(2006-2015 年)内 987 家医院的 5433 名局部晚期胃癌(≥cT2 和/或 cN+)患者进行了全国性队列研究。患者分为接受新辅助治疗(NT)或辅助治疗(AT)的患者。还根据接受 AL(≥15 个淋巴结)和 MMT(术前、围手术期或术后任何 AT 手术)的情况对患者进行分类。根据主要治疗方法和达到性能基准(AL≥80%;MMT≥75%)的患者比例,对医院进行分层。使用多变量共享脆弱性 Cox 模型评估与总体死亡风险的关联。

结果

总体而言,54.5%的患者接受 AT 治疗,45.6%的患者接受 NT 治疗。与单独手术相比,两种方法中任何一种方法接受 MMT 治疗均与死亡风险降低相关(NT-风险比 [HR]:0.75,95%置信区间:[0.65-0.86];AT-HR:0.80 [0.71-0.90])。与混合模式医院的治疗相比,主要接受 AT 治疗的医院的治疗与死亡风险增加相关(HR:1.28 [1.12-1.47])。与未达到任何质量标准的患者相比,AL(HR:0.75,[0.67-0.82])和 MMT(HR:0.68 [0.60-0.76])均与降低的死亡风险相关。同时接受这两种措施与降低的死亡风险甚至更大(HR:0.47 [0.40-0.56])。医院在 AL、MMT 或两者方面的表现均与死亡风险无关。

结论

由于超过一半的患者首先接受手术治疗(许多患者仅接受手术治疗),并且首选手术治疗的医院的治疗结果较差,因此质量改进(QI)工作应侧重于增加 NT 策略的使用。此外,AL 和 MMT 的联合应用可能代表了胃癌 QI 工作的一个可操作、可推广的目标,因为它可以提高生存率,且与提供护理的环境无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验