• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用有序逻辑回归模型预测急诊科的候诊和治疗时间。

Predicting waiting and treatment times in emergency departments using ordinal logistic regression models.

机构信息

Izmir Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Turkey.

Yaşar University, Department of Business, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.061. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.061
PMID:33721589
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since providing timely care is the primary concern of emergency departments (EDs), long waiting times increase patient dissatisfaction and adverse outcomes. Especially in overcrowded ED environments, emergency care quality can be significantly improved by developing predictive models of patients' waiting and treatment times to use in ED operations planning.

METHODS

Retrospective data on 37,711 patients arriving at the ED of a large urban hospital were examined. Ordinal logistic regression models were proposed to identify factors causing increased waiting and treatment times and classify patients with longer waiting and treatment times.

RESULTS

According to the proposed ordinal logistic regression model for waiting time prediction, age, arrival mode, and ICD-10 encoded diagnoses are all significant predictors. The model had 52.247% accuracy. The model for treatment time showed that in addition to age, arrival mode, and diagnosis, triage level was also a significant predictor. The model had 66.365% accuracy. The model coefficients had negative signs in the corresponding models, indicating that waiting times are negatively related to treatment times.

CONCLUSION

By predicting patients' waiting and treatment times, ED workloads can be assessed instantly. This enables ED personnel to be scheduled to better manage demand supply deficiencies, increase patient satisfaction by informing patients and relatives about expected waiting times, and evaluate performances to improve ED operations and emergency care quality.

摘要

背景

由于及时提供护理是急诊科(ED)的首要关注点,因此较长的等待时间会增加患者的不满和不良后果。特别是在人满为患的 ED 环境中,可以通过开发患者等待和治疗时间的预测模型来显著提高急诊护理质量,以便在 ED 运营规划中使用。

方法

对一家大型城市医院 ED 收治的 37711 名患者的回顾性数据进行了检查。提出了有序逻辑回归模型,以确定导致等待和治疗时间延长的因素,并对等待和治疗时间较长的患者进行分类。

结果

根据等待时间预测的提出的有序逻辑回归模型,年龄、入院方式和 ICD-10 编码诊断都是显著的预测因素。该模型的准确率为 52.247%。治疗时间模型表明,除了年龄、入院方式和诊断外,分诊级别也是一个显著的预测因素。该模型的准确率为 66.365%。相应模型中的模型系数具有负号,表明等待时间与治疗时间呈负相关。

结论

通过预测患者的等待和治疗时间,可以即时评估 ED 的工作量。这使 ED 人员能够更好地安排工作,以管理供需不足的情况,通过告知患者和家属预期的等待时间来提高患者的满意度,并评估绩效以改善 ED 运营和急诊护理质量。

相似文献

1
Predicting waiting and treatment times in emergency departments using ordinal logistic regression models.运用有序逻辑回归模型预测急诊科的候诊和治疗时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.061. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Which patients wait longer to be seen and when? A waiting time study in the emergency department.哪些患者等待就诊的时间更长以及何时会这样?一项急诊科等待时间的研究。
East Mediterr Health J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):416-24.
3
Racial and ethnic variations in waiting times for emergency department visits related to nontraumatic dental conditions in the United States.美国非创伤性牙科急诊就诊等候时间的种族和民族差异。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):828-36. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0195.
4
Emergency Department Waiting Times in an Israeli Children's Hospital During Times of Military Conflict.以色列儿童医院在军事冲突期间的急诊科候诊时间
Mil Med. 2018 Jan 1;183(1-2):e28-e31. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx054.
5
Patients who leave Emergency Department without being seen or during treatment in the Lazio Region (Central Italy): Determinants and short term outcomes.在拉齐奥地区(意大利中部),未被诊治或在治疗过程中离开急诊部的患者:决定因素和短期结局。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208914. eCollection 2018.
6
Are service and patient indicators different in the presence or absence of nurse practitioners? The EDPRAC cohort study of Australian emergency departments.在有或没有执业护师的情况下,服务和患者指标是否不同?澳大利亚急诊科 EDPRAC 队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 30;9(7):e024529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024529.
7
Investigation of emergency department abandonment rates using machine learning algorithms in a single centre study.使用机器学习算法对单一中心研究中的急诊科弃诊率进行调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70545-w.
8
Crowding in the emergency department in the absence of boarding - a transition regression model to predict departures and waiting time.急诊科拥挤而无病床——一种预测离院和等待时间的过渡回归模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0710-3.
9
A regional survey to determine factors influencing patient choices in selecting a particular emergency department for care.一项区域性调查,旨在确定影响患者选择特定急诊科室进行治疗的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/acem.12063.
10
The impact of emergency department crowding on admission decisions and patient outcomes.急诊科拥挤对入院决策和患者结局的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.049. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Doctors should choose communication strategies based on the patient's attitude toward disease and healthcare workers: a study in Jiangsu, China.医生应根据患者对疾病及医护人员的态度选择沟通策略:一项在中国江苏开展的研究。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 3;5:1520628. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1520628. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of expected waiting time on pediatric outpatient satisfaction: a behavioral experiment study.预期等待时间对儿科门诊患者满意度的影响:一项行为实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 14;25(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12714-9.
3
Evaluating fairness of machine learning prediction of prolonged wait times in Emergency Department with Interpretable eXtreme gradient boosting.
使用可解释的极端梯度提升算法评估急诊科长时间等待时间机器学习预测的公平性。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Mar 20;4(3):e0000751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000751. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Comparing Emergency Nursing Measures Before and During COVID-19: A Retrospective Study of Assessment, Triage, and Workflow.比较 COVID-19 之前和期间的急诊护理措施:一项关于评估、分诊和工作流程的回顾性研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 22;10:23779608241274766. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274766. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
The Effects of Displaying the Time Targets of the Manchester Triage System to Emergency Department Personnel: Prospective Crossover Study.显示曼彻斯特分诊系统时间目标对急诊科人员的影响:前瞻性交叉研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 14;26:e45593. doi: 10.2196/45593.
6
Characteristics and Admission Preferences of Pediatric Emergency Patients and Their Waiting Time Prediction Using Electronic Medical Record Data: Retrospective Comparative Analysis.利用电子病历数据预测儿科急诊患者特征及入院偏好和等候时间:回顾性对比分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 1;25:e49605. doi: 10.2196/49605.
7
Factors Relating to Decision Delay in the Emergency Department: Effects of Diagnostic Tests and Consultations.急诊科决策延迟的相关因素:诊断检查和会诊的影响。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 28;15:119-131. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S384774. eCollection 2023.
8
Main Features and Control Strategies to Reduce Overcrowding in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.减少急诊科过度拥挤的主要特征和控制策略:文献系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Feb 21;16:255-266. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S399045. eCollection 2023.
9
Developing a machine learning model to predict patient need for computed tomography imaging in the emergency department.开发一个机器学习模型,以预测急诊科患者对计算机断层扫描成像的需求。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278229. eCollection 2022.
10
Big data analytics and the effects of government restrictions and prohibitions in the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department sustainable operations.大数据分析以及新冠疫情期间政府限制和禁令对急诊科可持续运营的影响。
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Sep 15:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04955-2.