• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻甲手术中的医疗事故索赔。

Medical Malpractice Allegations in Nasal Turbinate Surgery.

机构信息

University of Washington Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Schroeter Goldmark & Bender Law Firm, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Nov;35(6):840-845. doi: 10.1177/19458924211004052. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1177/19458924211004052
PMID:33722101
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite studies showing most patients significantly improve their nasal congestion with surgical management of nasal turbinates, not all achieve acceptable results. Rarely, patients report substantial worsening of symptoms leading to litigation risk.

OBJECTIVE

Document the United States medicolegal environment for nasal turbinate surgery.

METHODS

We searched the Westlaw database for turbinate related terms for 1987- July 2019, recording demographics, claims, legal arguments, and outcomes in legal cases related to nasal turbinate surgery. We assessed prevalence and correlations with case outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 39 cases identified, the most common complaint was nose/facial pain (53.8% of cases). Surgeons prevailed in 87.2% of cases, with total liabilities of $3,224,606 [mean $97,715.3, ±$283,900.8]. Surgeons had statistically significant favorable outcomes when patients claimed dryness, headache, congestion, crusting, breathing problems, and disfigurement (all p < 0.05). Revision surgery was indicated in 23.1% of cases and was claimed in 40.0% of patient awards. Surgical negligence was claimed in 40.0% of patient awards versus 67.9% of surgeon awards (p = 0.333). Lack of informed consent was claimed in 20.0% of patient awards versus 32.1% of surgeon awards (p = 0.601).

CONCLUSIONS

There are inherent litigation risks for surgeons when performing nasal turbinate surgery. Most claims against surgeons, are resolved in favor of the surgeon. Understanding the types of claims and legal arguments that are made by patients could help assessing the risks of a proposed litigation. Documenting clear indications for surgery and written informed consent may reduce litigations against surgeons.

摘要

背景

尽管有研究表明,大多数患者通过鼻甲手术治疗可显著改善鼻塞症状,但并非所有患者都能获得满意的效果。极少数患者报告症状显著恶化,导致法律诉讼风险。

目的

记录美国鼻甲手术的法医学环境。

方法

我们在 Westlaw 数据库中搜索了 1987 年至 2019 年 7 月与鼻甲相关的术语,记录了与鼻甲手术相关的法律案件中的人口统计学数据、诉求、法律论点和结果。我们评估了这些案件的发生率及其与案件结果的相关性。

结果

在确定的 39 个案例中,最常见的投诉是鼻/面部疼痛(53.8%的案例)。87.2%的案例中外科医生胜诉,总赔偿额为 3224606 美元[平均 97715.3 美元,±283900.8 美元]。当患者声称出现干燥、头痛、鼻塞、结痂、呼吸问题和畸形时,外科医生的结果具有统计学意义上的优势(均 p<0.05)。23.1%的案例需要进行修正手术,其中 40.0%的患者获得了赔偿。40.0%的患者赔偿中声称外科医生存在手术疏忽,而 67.9%的外科医生赔偿中声称患者缺乏知情同意(p=0.333)。20.0%的患者赔偿中声称患者缺乏知情同意,而 32.1%的外科医生赔偿中声称外科医生存在手术疏忽(p=0.601)。

结论

外科医生行鼻甲手术时存在固有的法律诉讼风险。大多数针对外科医生的诉求都以有利于外科医生的方式解决。了解患者提出的诉求类型和法律论点,可以帮助评估拟议诉讼的风险。记录明确的手术适应证和书面知情同意书可能会减少对外科医生的诉讼。

相似文献

1
Medical Malpractice Allegations in Nasal Turbinate Surgery.鼻甲手术中的医疗事故索赔。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Nov;35(6):840-845. doi: 10.1177/19458924211004052. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Characterization of Medical Malpractice Litigation After Rhinoplasty in the United States.美国隆鼻术后医疗纠纷诉讼的特征。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Sep 14;41(10):1132-1138. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa380.
3
Malpractice litigation after thyroid surgery: What factors favor surgeons?甲状腺手术后的医疗事故诉讼:哪些因素有利于外科医生?
Surgery. 2024 Jan;175(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.071. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
4
Medical malpractice litigation after total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis based on the Westlaw legal database.全肩关节置换术后的医疗事故诉讼:基于 Westlaw 法律数据库的综合分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
5
Malpractice litigation surrounding in vitro fertilization in the United States: a legal literature review.美国围绕体外受精的医疗事故诉讼:一项法律文献综述
Fertil Steril. 2023 Apr;119(4):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.038. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
Medical malpractice in robotic surgery: a Westlaw database analysis.机器人手术中的医疗事故:Westlaw 数据库分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):191-196. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01417-6. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Malpractice allegations against vascular surgeons: Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on surgeon wellness.血管外科医生的医疗事故指控:发生率、风险因素及对外科医生健康的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):680-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.233. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
8
Litigation Following Carpal Tunnel Release.腕管松解术后的诉讼
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):466-470. doi: 10.1177/1558944718760032. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Malpractice litigation in the endovascular era.血管内治疗时代的医疗事故诉讼
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.081. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Allegations of Failure to Obtain Informed Consent in Otolaryngology: Evidenced-Based Recommendations for Sinus Surgeons.耳鼻喉科中关于未获得知情同意的指控:鼻窦外科医生基于证据的建议
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023 May;37(3):330-336. doi: 10.1177/19458924221148566. Epub 2023 Jan 2.