Suppr超能文献

抗生素治疗与慢性子宫内膜炎不治疗的对照研究。

Antibiotic therapy versus no treatment for chronic endometritis: a case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1541-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the infectious nature of chronic endometritis (CE) in an inductive way by comparing the results of germ-oriented antibiotic therapy vs. no treatment in women with CE.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonconcurrent case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary hysteroscopic center in a university teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S): Sixty-four consecutive women with CE who received antibiotic therapy (Group A) compared with a historical group of 64 patients with CE who refused antibiotic therapy (Group B).

INTERVENTIONS(S): CE was diagnosed through hysteroscopy, histology, and immunohistochemistry for CD138. Patients in both groups were tested for CE twice to evaluate the cure rate after antibiotic therapy (Group A) or no treatment (Group B). For patients with persistent disease, antibiotic therapy was repeated up to 3 times. Antibiotics were chosen based on endometrial culture (with antibiogram).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was to compare the cumulative cure rate of CE (defined as the percentage of patients without CE at the test of cure) between groups.

RESULT(S): Among Group A, 20 patients (31.25%) experienced CE resolution after 1 antibiotic cycle, an additional 20 patients (31.25%) after 2 antibiotic cycles, and 12 patients (19.35%) after 3 antibiotic cycles. In 12 cases (18.75%), CE was persistent after 3 cycles of antibiotics. The cure rate of CE in Group A after 1 cycle of antibiotics was significantly higher than that of Group B (32.25% vs. 6%). Similarly, the cumulative cure rate was considerably higher in Group A vs. Group B (81.3% vs. 6%). Notably, the number of positive cases decreased significantly with all techniques between the first and second evaluation, whereas at the third evaluation, there was a statistical decrease only with hysteroscopy and CD138 cell count but not with histology. The cumulative number of cases of CE diagnosed at hysteroscopy was significantly higher than histology and immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSION(S): Our study demonstrated the superiority of antibiotic therapy compared with no treatment for CE cure. Accordingly, the infectious nature of CE is inferred.

摘要

目的

通过比较慢性子宫内膜炎(CE)患者接受靶向细菌的抗生素治疗与不治疗的结果,以诱导的方式证明 CE 的传染性。

设计

回顾性、非同期病例对照研究。

地点

大学教学医院的三级宫腔镜中心。

患者

64 例连续的 CE 患者接受了抗生素治疗(A 组),并与 64 例拒绝抗生素治疗的 CE 患者(B 组)进行了历史比较。

干预措施

通过宫腔镜、组织学和 CD138 的免疫组织化学诊断 CE。两组患者均进行了两次 CE 检测,以评估抗生素治疗(A 组)或不治疗(B 组)后的治愈率。对于持续存在疾病的患者,重复使用抗生素治疗 3 次。根据子宫内膜培养(药敏试验)选择抗生素。

主要观察指标

主要结局是比较两组 CE 的累积治愈率(定义为治愈时无 CE 的患者百分比)。

结果

A 组中,20 例(31.25%)患者在接受 1 个抗生素周期后 CE 缓解,20 例(31.25%)患者在接受 2 个抗生素周期后缓解,12 例(19.35%)患者在接受 3 个抗生素周期后缓解。在 12 例(18.75%)中,CE 在 3 个周期的抗生素治疗后仍然存在。A 组中接受 1 个周期抗生素治疗的 CE 治愈率明显高于 B 组(32.25%比 6%)。同样,A 组的累积治愈率明显高于 B 组(81.3%比 6%)。值得注意的是,所有技术在第一次和第二次评估之间均使阳性病例数量显著减少,而在第三次评估时,仅宫腔镜和 CD138 细胞计数的统计学下降,但组织学没有下降。在宫腔镜下诊断的 CE 病例总数明显高于组织学和免疫组织化学。

结论

本研究表明,与不治疗相比,CE 的抗生素治疗具有优势。因此,推断 CE 具有传染性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验