• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Family-Centered practice in a Brazilian rehabilitation network service.巴西康复网络服务中的以家庭为中心的实践。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
2
Parents' and service providers' perceptions of family-centred practice in a community-based, paediatric disability service in Australia.澳大利亚一项基于社区的儿科残疾服务中家长和服务提供者对以家庭为中心的实践的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Sep;33(5):586-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00763.x.
3
Family-centred care for children and young people with cerebral palsy: results from an Italian multicenter observational study.以家庭为中心的脑瘫儿童和青少年护理:一项意大利多中心观察性研究的结果。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jul;43(4):588-597. doi: 10.1111/cch.12449. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Brazilian versions of the Measure of Processes of Care-20 and Measure of Processes of Care-Service Providers: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability.中文版《照顾过程测量-20 版》和《照顾过程测量-提供者版》:翻译、跨文化调适和信度。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Use of the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20) to evaluate health service delivery for children with cerebral palsy and their families in Jordan: validation of Arabic-translated version (AR-MPOC-20).使用医疗服务过程评估量表(MPOC-20)评估约旦脑瘫患儿及其家庭的医疗服务提供情况:阿拉伯语翻译版本(AR-MPOC-20)的验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Sep;40(5):680-8. doi: 10.1111/cch.12116.
6
Two sides of the mirror: parents' and service providers' view on the family-centredness of care for children with cerebral palsy.镜子的两面:父母与服务提供者对脑瘫患儿家庭本位照护的看法
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Jan;38(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01305.x. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
7
Evaluation of family-centred services from parents of Chinese children with cerebral palsy with the Measure of Processes of Care.运用护理过程评估量表对中国脑瘫患儿家长的家庭中心服务进行评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 May;41(3):408-15. doi: 10.1111/cch.12183. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Family-centred service: differences in what parents of children with cerebral palsy rate important.以家庭为中心的服务:脑瘫患儿家长对重要事项的评分差异。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Sep;43(5):663-669. doi: 10.1111/cch.12460. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
A family-specific use of the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP).服务提供者护理过程评估量表(MPOC-SP)在特定家庭中的应用。
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Mar;22(3):242-51. doi: 10.1177/0269215507081568. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
10
Validity, internal consistency reliability and one-year stability of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care (20-item version).《护理过程量表》(20项版本)斯洛文尼亚语译本的效度、内部一致性信度及一年稳定性
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Jul;41(4):569-80. doi: 10.1111/cch.12198. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of family-centered care in the pediatric rehabilitation ward: a participatory action research.儿科康复病房以家庭为中心护理的改善:一项参与式行动研究
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jun 21;12:1325235. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1325235. eCollection 2024.
2
Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.拉丁美洲患者为中心的护理理念:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1820-1831. doi: 10.1111/hex.13797. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Brazilian versions of the Measure of Processes of Care-20 and Measure of Processes of Care-Service Providers: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability.中文版《照顾过程测量-20 版》和《照顾过程测量-提供者版》:翻译、跨文化调适和信度。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
2
Let's make pediatric physical therapy a true evidence-based field! Can we count on you?让我们将儿科物理治疗打造成一个真正基于证据的领域!我们能依靠你吗?
Braz J Phys Ther. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):187-188. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Family-centred health care for children with cerebral palsy.以家庭为中心的脑瘫儿童保健
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jan;61(1):62-68. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14053. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
4
Parents' Perception of Receiving Family-Centered Care for Their Children with Physical Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis.父母对其残疾子女接受以家庭为中心护理的认知:一项荟萃分析。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018 Nov;38(4):427-443. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2017.1337664. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
Measuring family-centred practices of professionals in early intervention services in Taiwan.衡量台湾早期干预服务中专业人员以家庭为中心的实践情况。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Sep;43(5):709-717. doi: 10.1111/cch.12463. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
6
Family-centred care for children and young people with cerebral palsy: results from an Italian multicenter observational study.以家庭为中心的脑瘫儿童和青少年护理:一项意大利多中心观察性研究的结果。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jul;43(4):588-597. doi: 10.1111/cch.12449. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Diverging perspectives on children's rehabilitation services: a mixed-methods study.关于儿童康复服务的不同观点:一项混合方法研究。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2016 Sep;23(5):374-82. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1105292. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
8
Family-centered care for children with cerebral palsy: conceptual and practical considerations to advance care and practice.以家庭为中心的脑瘫儿童护理:推进护理与实践的概念及实际考量
J Child Neurol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1046-54. doi: 10.1177/0883073814533009. Epub 2014 May 7.
9
Measure of processes of care: a review of 20 years of research.测量护理过程:对 20 年研究的回顾。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 May;56(5):445-52. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12347. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
10
Family-professional collaboration in pediatric rehabilitation: a practice model.儿科康复中的家庭 - 专业人员协作:一种实践模式。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):434-40. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.797510. Epub 2013 May 29.

巴西康复网络服务中的以家庭为中心的实践。

Family-Centered practice in a Brazilian rehabilitation network service.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Physical Therapist, Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Departament of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.02.003
PMID:33722507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8536853/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family-centered practice (FCP) is widely accepted as a best practice in pediatric rehabilitation. However, its implementation in Brazil is incipient, and systematic documentation of the extent to which it has been achieved is not available.

OBJECTIVES

To determine parents' and service providers' perceptions of family-centeredness and specific areas in need of improvement in four rehabilitation hospitals.

METHODS

A total of 107 caregivers and 89 service providers responded to the Measure of Processes of Care-20 (MPOC-20) and the Measure of Processes of Care for Service providers (MPOC-SP), respectively. The MPOC questionnaires evaluate FCP from the point of view of parents and rehabilitation professionals. Domain scores within each questionnaire were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. MPOC items with low scores (from 1-4 out of 7 by 33% or more of respondents) were considered to indicate weaknesses in service delivery.

RESULTS

Median MPOC-20 scores varied from 5.2 (4.7, 5.8) (Providing General Information) to 7.0 (6.0, 7.0) (Enabling and Partnership). The Providing General Information scores were significantly lower than those of other domains (p <  0.003). The MPOC-SP scores varied from 4.8 (4.0, 5.8) (Providing General Information) to 6.1 (5.8, 6.6) (Treating People Respectfully). Scores for Treating People Respectfully were significantly higher (p <  0.0001) and Providing General Information scores significantly lower (p <  0.0001) than those of the other domains. Most items with high percentages of low scores were from the domain Providing General Information.

CONCLUSION

Except for Providing General Information, the results indicated that services implement FCP "to a fairly great extent," comparing favorably to international data. Provision of information can be improved.

摘要

背景

以家庭为中心的实践(FCP)已被广泛认为是儿科康复的最佳实践。然而,它在巴西的实施还处于起步阶段,尚未对其实施程度进行系统的记录。

目的

确定四家康复医院的家长和服务提供者对以家庭为中心的看法,以及需要改进的具体领域。

方法

共有 107 名照顾者和 89 名服务提供者分别对护理过程测量-20(MPOC-20)和服务提供者护理过程测量(MPOC-SP)进行了回答。MPOC 问卷从父母和康复专业人员的角度评估 FCP。每个问卷的域评分均通过 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验进行比较。MPOC 中得分较低的项目(由 33%或更多的受访者对 7 分制中的 1-4 分进行评估)被认为是服务提供中的薄弱环节。

结果

MPOC-20 的中位数评分为 5.2(4.7,5.8)(提供一般信息)至 7.0(6.0,7.0)(赋能和合作)。提供一般信息的评分明显低于其他领域(p<0.003)。MPOC-SP 的评分范围从 4.8(4.0,5.8)(提供一般信息)至 6.1(5.8,6.6)(尊重他人)。尊重他人的评分明显较高(p<0.0001),提供一般信息的评分明显较低(p<0.0001),而其他领域的评分则明显较高。高比例低评分项目大多来自提供一般信息的领域。

结论

除了提供一般信息外,结果表明服务以“相当大的程度”实施了 FCP,与国际数据相比表现良好。可以改进信息的提供。