• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国和爱尔兰的社会经济不平等与不良妊娠结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Primary Care Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 15;11(3):e042753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042753.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042753
PMID:33722867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7959237/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There has been an unprecedented rise in infant mortality associated with deprivation in recent years in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland. A healthy pregnancy can have significant impacts on the life chances of children. The objective of this review was to understand the association between individual-level and household-level measures of socioeconomic status and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Nine databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Scopus, ASSIA, CINAHL, PsycINFO, BNI, MIDRIS and Google Scholar) for articles published between 1999 and August 2019. Grey literature searches were also assessed.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies reporting associations between individual-level or household socioeconomic factors on pregnancy outcomes in the UK or Ireland.

RESULTS

Among the 82 353 search results, 53 821 titles were identified and 35 unique studies met the eligibility criteria. Outcomes reported were neonatal, perinatal and maternal mortality, preterm birth, birth weight and mode of delivery. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. There were significantly increased odds of women from lower levels of occupation/social classes compared with the highest level having stillbirth (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.59, I), neonatal mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.57, I), perinatal mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.57, I), preterm birth (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.50, I) and low birth weight (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61, I). Limitations relate to available data, unmeasured confounders and the small number of studies for some outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified consistent evidence that lower occupational status, especially manual occupations and unemployment, were significantly associated with increased risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes. Strategies to improve pregnancy outcomes should incorporate approaches that address wider determinants of health to provide women and families with the best chances of having a healthy pregnancy and baby and to decrease pregnancy-related health inequalities in the general population.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42019140893.

摘要

目的

近年来,英国(UK)和爱尔兰共和国与贫困相关的婴儿死亡率空前上升。健康的怀孕对儿童的生活机会有重大影响。本综述的目的是了解个体和家庭社会经济地位指标与不良妊娠结局之间的关联。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

资料来源

1999 年至 2019 年 8 月,在 9 个数据库(Medline、Embase、Scopus、ASSIA、CINAHL、PsycINFO、BNI、MIDRIS 和 Google Scholar)中搜索了文章。还评估了灰色文献检索。

研究选择标准

报告英国或爱尔兰个体或家庭社会经济因素与妊娠结局之间关联的研究。

结果

在 82353 条搜索结果中,确定了 53821 个标题,35 项独特的研究符合入选标准。报告的结果包括新生儿、围产期和产妇死亡率、早产、出生体重和分娩方式。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算了汇总效应量。与最高职业/社会阶层相比,来自较低职业/社会阶层的女性死产(OR 1.40,95%CI 1.23 至 1.59,I)、新生儿死亡率(OR 1.39,95%CI 1.22 至 1.57,I)、围产期死亡率(OR 1.39,95%CI 1.23 至 1.57,I)、早产(OR 1.41,95%CI 1.33 至 1.50,I)和低出生体重(OR 1.40,95%CI 1.19 至 1.61,I)的风险显著增加。限制因素涉及可用数据、未测量的混杂因素以及一些结局的研究数量较少。

结论

本综述确定了一致的证据,即较低的职业地位,特别是体力劳动职业和失业,与多种不良妊娠结局的风险增加显著相关。改善妊娠结局的策略应纳入解决健康更广泛决定因素的方法,为妇女及其家庭提供拥有健康怀孕和婴儿的最佳机会,并减少一般人群中与怀孕相关的健康不平等。

前瞻性注册

PROSPERO CRD42019140893。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/44320f1e293a/bmjopen-2020-042753f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/6945b4a52e34/bmjopen-2020-042753f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/ff038f574753/bmjopen-2020-042753f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/9a082d6a7a3b/bmjopen-2020-042753f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/929224b5e2cb/bmjopen-2020-042753f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/224c71bfb570/bmjopen-2020-042753f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/49fc95ca361b/bmjopen-2020-042753f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/5165d0f81a9a/bmjopen-2020-042753f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/cff30b092f42/bmjopen-2020-042753f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/24f4177b90a7/bmjopen-2020-042753f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/afab5d0684b0/bmjopen-2020-042753f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/44320f1e293a/bmjopen-2020-042753f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/6945b4a52e34/bmjopen-2020-042753f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/ff038f574753/bmjopen-2020-042753f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/9a082d6a7a3b/bmjopen-2020-042753f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/929224b5e2cb/bmjopen-2020-042753f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/224c71bfb570/bmjopen-2020-042753f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/49fc95ca361b/bmjopen-2020-042753f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/5165d0f81a9a/bmjopen-2020-042753f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/cff30b092f42/bmjopen-2020-042753f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/24f4177b90a7/bmjopen-2020-042753f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/afab5d0684b0/bmjopen-2020-042753f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/7959237/44320f1e293a/bmjopen-2020-042753f11.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis.英国和爱尔兰的社会经济不平等与不良妊娠结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 15;11(3):e042753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042753.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Pregnancy after bariatric surgery and adverse perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.减重手术后的妊娠与不良围产期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Aug 6;16(8):e1002866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002866. eCollection 2019 Aug.
4
Does a maternal history of abuse before pregnancy affect pregnancy outcomes? A systematic review with meta-analysis.妊娠前母体虐待史是否会影响妊娠结局?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2030-8.
5
6
Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy.孕期女性的多种微量营养素补充
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD004905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004905.pub5.
7
Associations of Unintended Pregnancy With Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.意外妊娠与母婴健康结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1714-1729. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19097.
8
Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes for Women With and Without Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较有和无癫痫的女性围产期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 May 1;80(5):484-494. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0148.
9
Gestational weight gain below instead of within the guidelines per class of maternal obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.按孕妇肥胖类别划分,孕期体重增加未达而非处于指南范围:产科和新生儿结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100682. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100682. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Treating periodontal disease for preventing adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women.治疗牙周疾病以预防孕妇不良分娩结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD005297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005297.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Preterm Birth in a Marginalized Roma Population-Quantitative Analysis in One of the Most Disadvantaged Regions of Hungary.匈牙利最贫困地区之一边缘化罗姆人群体的早产患病率——定量分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):1270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081270.
2
Assessing ambient air pollution's effects on birth outcomes: a Scottish IVF cohort study (2010 -2018).评估环境空气污染对出生结局的影响:一项苏格兰体外受精队列研究(2010 - 2018年)。
Environ Health. 2025 Aug 4;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12940-025-01204-4.
3
? Sociological Aspects of Pregnancy, Birth, and Breastfeeding: Implications for Midwifery Practice-A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与卫生不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
2
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
3
Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000-2017: time trend analysis.评估2000 - 2017年儿童贫困加剧对英格兰婴儿死亡率空前上升的影响:时间趋势分析
妊娠、分娩和母乳喂养的社会学方面:对助产实践的影响——一项叙述性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;13(13):1540. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131540.
4
Diet in Pregnancy: A Review of Current Challenges and Recommendations. A British Nutrition Foundation Briefing Paper.孕期饮食:当前挑战与建议综述。英国营养基金会简报文件。
Nutr Bull. 2025 Jul 6. doi: 10.1111/nbu.70016.
5
Preterm birth, socioeconomic status, and white matter development across childhood.早产、社会经济地位与儿童期白质发育
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.10.25328994. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.10.25328994.
6
Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial.提高招募的多样性:REACH孕期交流圈试点试验中的经验教训
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70300. doi: 10.1111/hex.70300.
7
The association of COVID-19 lockdowns with adverse birth and pregnancy outcomes in 28 high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.28个高收入国家中新冠疫情封锁措施与不良出生及妊娠结局的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02139-z.
8
Wider determinants of adverse birth outcomes in Birmingham and Solihull.伯明翰和索利哈尔不良分娩结局的更广泛决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;13:1544903. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1544903. eCollection 2025.
9
Mediation of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth. A cohort analysis of Welsh linked data.早产中社会经济不平等的中介作用。威尔士关联数据的队列分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15101. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
10
Risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women consuming recreational drugs during pregnancy.孕期使用消遣性药物的女性出现不良产科和新生儿结局的风险。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07062-1.
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e029424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029424.
4
Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England.小于胎龄儿出生发生率中的社会经济不平等现象正在缩小吗?来自英格兰南部一项基于人群的队列研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e026998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998.
5
The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.母亲体重指数与儿童肥胖的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 11;16(6):e1002817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002817. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews.社会保护政策对健康不平等的影响:系统评价的证据。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Aug;47(6):655-665. doi: 10.1177/1403494819848276. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
The impact of New Labour's English health inequalities strategy on geographical inequalities in infant mortality: a time-trend analysis.新工党英语卫生不平等战略对婴儿死亡率的地理不平等的影响:时间趋势分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):564-568. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211679. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Small for gestational age and risk of childhood mortality: A Swedish population study.小于胎龄儿与儿童死亡率风险:一项瑞典人群研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002717. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Social determinants of health and adverse maternal and birth outcomes in adolescent pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年怀孕中健康的社会决定因素与不良孕产妇及分娩结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):88-99. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12529. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Welfare-to-work interventions and their effects on the mental and physical health of lone parents and their children.从福利到工作的干预措施及其对单亲父母及其子女身心健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 26;2(2):CD009820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009820.pub3.