Huang Yuangeng, Chen Zhong-Qiang, Roopnarine Peter D, Benton Michael J, Yang Wan, Liu Jun, Zhao Laishi, Li Zhenhua, Guo Zhen
State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, People's Republic of China.
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Geology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;288(1947):20210148. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0148. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
The Earth has been beset by many crises during its history, and yet comparing the ecological impacts of these mass extinctions has been difficult. Key questions concern the kinds of species that go extinct and survive, how communities rebuild in the post-extinction recovery phase, and especially how the scaling of events affects these processes. Here, we explore ecological impacts of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems in three mass extinctions through the mid-Phanerozoic, a span of 121 million years (295-174 Ma). This critical duration encompasses the largest mass extinction of all time, the Permian-Triassic (P-Tr) and is flanked by two smaller crises, the Guadalupian-Lopingian (G-L) and Triassic-Jurassic (T-J) mass extinctions. Palaeocommunity dynamics modelling of 14 terrestrial and freshwater communities through a long sedimentary succession from the lower Permian to the lower Jurassic in northern Xinjiang, northwest China, shows that the P-Tr mass extinction differed from the other two in two ways: (i) ecological recovery from this extinction was prolonged and the three post-extinction communities in the Early Triassic showed low stability and highly variable and unpredictable responses to perturbation primarily following the huge losses of species, guilds and trophic space; and (ii) the G-L and T-J extinctions were each preceded by low-stability communities, but post-extinction recovery was rapid. Our results confirm the uniqueness of the P-Tr mass extinction and shed light on the trophic structure and ecological dynamics of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems across the three mid-Phanerozoic extinctions, and how complex communities respond to environmental stress and how communities recovered after the crisis. Comparisons with the coeval communities from the Karoo Basin, South Africa show that geographically and compositionally different communities of terrestrial ecosystems were affected in much the same way by the P-Tr extinction.
地球在其历史上曾遭受过许多危机,然而,比较这些大规模灭绝事件的生态影响却并非易事。关键问题涉及灭绝和幸存的物种类型、群落如何在灭绝后的恢复阶段进行重建,尤其是事件的规模如何影响这些过程。在这里,我们通过中生代中期长达1.21亿年(2.95 - 1.74亿年前)的时间跨度,探讨了三次大规模灭绝事件对陆地和淡水生态系统的生态影响。这一关键时期涵盖了有史以来最大规模的灭绝事件——二叠纪 - 三叠纪(P - Tr)灭绝事件,其两侧分别是两次规模较小的危机,瓜德鲁普世 - 乐平世(G - L)和三叠纪 - 侏罗纪(T - J)大规模灭绝事件。通过对中国西北部新疆北部从下二叠统到下侏罗统的长期沉积序列中的14个陆地和淡水群落进行古群落动态建模,结果表明,P - Tr大规模灭绝事件在两个方面与其他两次不同:(i)这次灭绝事件后的生态恢复过程延长,早三叠世的三个灭绝后群落稳定性较低,主要在物种、功能群和营养空间大量损失之后,对干扰表现出高度可变且不可预测的反应;(ii)G - L和T - J灭绝事件之前的群落稳定性都较低,但灭绝后的恢复速度很快。我们的研究结果证实了P - Tr大规模灭绝事件的独特性,并揭示了中生代中期三次大规模灭绝事件中陆地和淡水生态系统的营养结构和生态动态,以及复杂群落如何应对环境压力和危机后群落如何恢复。与南非卡鲁盆地同期群落的比较表明,地理和组成不同的陆地生态系统群落受到P - Tr灭绝事件的影响方式大致相同。