• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2008 - 2017年一家三级转诊医院成年患者尸检主要临床病理差异分析]

[Analysis of the major clinical-pathological discrepancies in autopsies of adults in a tertiary referral hospital between 2008-2017].

作者信息

Rey-Fanjul Yaiza, Fernández-Vega Iván

机构信息

Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España.

Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España; Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Patol. 2021 Apr-Jun;54(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.patol.2020.02.003
PMID:33726896
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare and contrast clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings in order to identify unexpected, relevant discrepancies.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective observational study of the revision of autopsies of adults and their respective medical records in order to classify them according to referral department and Goldman's classification was carried out at the Central University Hospital of Asturias between 2008-2017.

RESULTS

694 (52.6%) of 1320 autopsies were included in the study. Discrepancies were observed in 57.6% of cases, although the majority (39.3%) were minor. Type I discrepancies were identified in 63 autopsies (9.1%); malignant neoplasms being the main pathology observed (57.1%), mainly of gastrointestinal origin (about 28%). The second most common discrepancy was found in cases of infectious diseases (23.8%) followed by pulmonary embolism (15.9%). 64 autopsies were classified as type II discrepancies (9.2%), with myocardial infarct the most common (37.5%), especially acute myocardial infarction (18 cases), followed by bronchoaspirations (18.7%), DIC (15.6%), massive haemorrhages (9.4%) and other conditions. It was considered that both the ICU and the Internal Medicine Service were responsible for the largest number of major discrepancies (type I and II), accounting for about 45% of type I and slightly more than 56% for type II.

CONCLUSION

Autopsies are an essential means of identifying ante-mortem clinical errors. The incidence of major discrepancies in the Central University Hospital of Asturias (18.3%) is comparable to that of leading hospitals worldwide.

摘要

目的

比较和对比临床诊断与尸检结果,以识别意外的、相关的差异。

材料与方法

对阿斯图里亚斯中央大学医院2008年至2017年间成人尸检及其相应病历进行回顾性观察研究,以便根据转诊科室和戈德曼分类法对其进行分类。

结果

1320例尸检中有694例(52.6%)纳入研究。57.6%的病例存在差异,不过大多数(39.3%)为轻微差异。63例尸检(9.1%)被确定为I型差异;观察到的主要病理类型为恶性肿瘤(57.1%),主要起源于胃肠道(约28%)。第二常见的差异见于传染病病例(23.8%),其次是肺栓塞(15.9%)。64例尸检被归类为II型差异(9.2%),最常见的是心肌梗死(37.5%),尤其是急性心肌梗死(18例),其次是支气管吸入(18.7%)、弥散性血管内凝血(15.6%)、大量出血(9.4%)和其他情况。认为重症监护病房和内科服务部门导致的主要差异(I型和II型)数量最多,I型约占45%,II型略多于56%。

结论

尸检是识别生前临床错误的重要手段。阿斯图里亚斯中央大学医院的主要差异发生率(18.3%)与全球领先医院相当。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of the major clinical-pathological discrepancies in autopsies of adults in a tertiary referral hospital between 2008-2017].[2008 - 2017年一家三级转诊医院成年患者尸检主要临床病理差异分析]
Rev Esp Patol. 2021 Apr-Jun;54(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Clinical and pathological discrepancies and cardiovascular findings in 409 consecutive autopsies.409 例连续尸检的临床和病理差异及心血管发现。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Dec;97(6):449-55. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000111. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
3
[Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings].[临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异]
Medicina (B Aires). 2011;71(2):135-8.
4
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一所综合大学医院中的临床病理差异。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.
5
Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?重症监护病房中的尸检:仍然有用吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Nov;30(11):2080-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2448-5. Epub 2004 Oct 7.
6
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.临终前临床诊断与尸检结果:重症癌症患者中的差异
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782.
7
Is Hospital Autopsy Auditing Suitable for Clinical Risk Manage ment? Actualities and Perspectives of Auditing in the Autopsy Room Following Italian Law 24/2017 on Patient Safety.医院尸检审核是否适合临床风险管理?根据意大利 2017 年 24 号患者安全法案对尸检室审核的现状和展望。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2021;22(15):1964-1970. doi: 10.2174/1389201021666201208115525.
8
Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients*.临床诊断和尸检结果:危重症患者中的差异*。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):842-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f64f.
9
Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses: a comparison of university, community, and private autopsy practices.临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异:大学、社区和私人尸检实践的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jan;129(1):102-9. doi: 10.1309/9M7DFE62RTDKHH4D.
10
A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.对在英国重症监护病房死亡患者的尸检结果与事后估计的临床诊断进行比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):706-10. doi: 10.1007/s001340100903.