• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不锈钢预成冠与大颗粒型复合树脂在后牙牙髓治疗后修复乳磨牙的 1 年疗效:一项随机临床试验的生存和接受情况结果。

Stainless steel crown vs bulk fill composites for the restoration of primary molars post-pulpectomy: 1-year survival and acceptance results of a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of Public & Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Jan;32(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12785. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1111/ipd.12785
PMID:33728707
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A key factor for the success and longevity of the endodontic treatment is sealing of the cavity after restorative treatment.

AIM

The aim of this randomised clinical trial was to evaluate the 1-year survival of endodontic treatment in primary molars restored with stainless steel crowns (SSCs) and bulk fill composite resin (BF). As a secondary outcome, the acceptance of both children and parents was evaluated.

DESIGN

Ninety-one 3- to 8-year-old children with at least one primary molar requiring endodontic treatment were selected. Participants were randomized to SSC or BF and evaluated after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. An acceptance questionnaire was completed immediately after the treatment. The primary outcome was the endodontic treatment success, evaluated in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population using the Kaplan-Meier and non-inferiority Cox regression analyses, with a non-inferiority limit of 15%. Sensitivity analysis between the success rates after 1 year was performed using Miettinen-Nurminen's method. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the treatment acceptance (α = 5%).

RESULTS

The survival rate after 1 year was BF = 75% and SSC = 88% (HR = 1.41; 90% CI 0.57-3.43). ITT analysis showed a success rate of BF = 86.7% and SSC = 82.6% (RR = 0.95; 0.78-1.16). The non-inferiority hypothesis between the survival of endodontic treatment could not be proved in both analyses (P > .05). The overall acceptance scores did not differ between the restorative groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to show non-inferiority of BF compared with the SSC. The materials were well accepted by both children and their parents.

摘要

背景

牙髓治疗成功和长期效果的一个关键因素是修复治疗后牙腔的密封。

目的

本随机临床试验的目的是评估用不锈钢冠(SSC)和块状填充复合树脂(BF)修复的乳磨牙牙髓治疗的 1 年存活率。作为次要结果,评估了儿童和家长的接受程度。

设计

选择了 91 名 3 至 8 岁至少有一颗需要牙髓治疗的乳磨牙的儿童。参与者被随机分配到 SSC 或 BF 组,并在 1、3、6 和 12 个月后进行评估。治疗后立即完成一份接受调查问卷。主要结局是使用 Kaplan-Meier 和非劣效 Cox 回归分析在意向治疗(ITT)人群中评估的牙髓治疗成功率,非劣效性界限为 15%。使用 Miettinen-Nurminen 方法对 1 年后的成功率进行敏感性分析。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验比较两种治疗方法的接受程度(α=5%)。

结果

1 年后的生存率为 BF=75%,SSC=88%(HR=1.41;90%CI 0.57-3.43)。ITT 分析显示 BF=86.7%,SSC=82.6%(RR=0.95;0.78-1.16)。两种分析均不能证明牙髓治疗存活率的非劣效性假设(P>.05)。两种修复组的总体接受评分无差异(P>.05)。

结论

本研究未能显示 BF 与 SSC 相比具有非劣效性。两种材料均被儿童及其家长很好地接受。

相似文献

1
Stainless steel crown vs bulk fill composites for the restoration of primary molars post-pulpectomy: 1-year survival and acceptance results of a randomized clinical trial.不锈钢预成冠与大颗粒型复合树脂在后牙牙髓治疗后修复乳磨牙的 1 年疗效:一项随机临床试验的生存和接受情况结果。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Jan;32(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12785. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
2
Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.预制儿童氧化锆冠与预制儿童金属冠的比较:一项随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 24;20(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3559-1.
3
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
4
Who wears the crown? Comparing 3D-printed resin crowns to preformed stainless steel crowns for restoring primary molars.谁能戴上这顶“王冠”?3D打印树脂冠与预成不锈钢冠用于修复乳磨牙的比较
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Sep;25(3):152-153. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01053-z. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
5
Longevity of stainless steel crowns as interim restorations on young permanent first molars that have undergone vital pulp therapy treatment in children and factors associated with their treatment failure: A retrospective study of up to 8.5 years.不锈钢预成冠作为活髓切断术治疗后年轻恒牙年轻恒磨牙的过渡性修复体的寿命及相关失败因素:长达 8.5 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Nov;32(6):925-937. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12971. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Survival Rates of Stainless Steel Crowns and Multi-Surface Composite Restorations Placed by Dental Students in a Pediatric Clinic.牙科学生在儿科诊所放置的不锈钢冠和多面复合修复体的存活率。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(3):167-172. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.3.1. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.不锈钢冠与改良开放式三明治修复术治疗乳磨牙的2年随机临床试验
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;18(5):325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00900.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
8
The use of stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠的使用。
Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):501-5.
9
One year clinical success of pulpectomy in primary molars with iodoform-calcium hydroxide paste.用碘仿-氢氧化钙糊剂进行乳牙牙髓切断术的一年临床疗效。
Quintessence Int. 2021 May 7;52(6):528-537. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1244443.
10
In vitro and clinical outcome of sandwich restorations with a bulk-fill flowable composite liner for pulpotomized primary teeth.采用大容量流动复合衬层的三明治修复术治疗乳磨牙活髓切断术后的体外及临床疗效
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Summer;38(4):349-54. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.4.f718041225w7621q.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Versus Incremental Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Evidence.乳牙中大块充填与分层充填复合树脂修复体的临床性能:一项体内证据的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;13(7):320. doi: 10.3390/dj13070320.
2
Evaluating the Aging of Stainless Steel Crowns: Volumetric and Morphological Insights from Nano-computed Tomography Imaging.评估不锈钢牙冠的老化:基于纳米计算机断层扫描成像的体积和形态学见解
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Apr;18(4):375-382. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3097. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
Analysis of pulp histological response to pulpotomy performed with white mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with 2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel in humans: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
人牙髓对用白色三氧化矿物盐聚合物与2.25%次氯酸钠凝胶混合进行的牙髓切断术的组织学反应分析:一项随机对照临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83158-0.
4
Comparative evaluation of clinical performance, child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients.儿童患者中 Bioflx、氧化锆全瓷冠和不锈钢金属冠的临床性能、儿童和家长满意度的对比评估。
F1000Res. 2023 Dec 21;12:756. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133464.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of the reasons for failure in teeth with vital amputation treatment.评价活髓切断术治疗失败的原因。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03171-z.
6
An approach of preserving a mandibular primary second molar by a hemisection procedure: A case report with 36-month follow up.一种通过半切术保留下颌第一乳磨牙的方法:一例36个月随访的病例报告
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 16;8(9):e10655. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10655. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Review on Preformed Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry-The Composition and Application.儿童牙科预成冠的综述——组成与应用
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;15(6):2081. doi: 10.3390/ma15062081.