• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019年英国电休克治疗的第二次独立审计:使用情况、人口统计学特征、同意情况以及对指南和立法的遵守情况

A second independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy in England, 2019: Usage, demographics, consent, and adherence to guidelines and legislation.

作者信息

Read John, Harrop Christopher, Geekie Jim, Renton Julia, Cunliffe Sue

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of East London, UK.

West London NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):603-619. doi: 10.1111/papt.12335. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/papt.12335
PMID:33728773
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess progress towards improving the administering of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in England since an audit covering 2011, 2013, and 2015. The same information was gathered, for 2019, on usage, demographics, consent, and adherence to national guidelines and the Mental Health Act.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Freedom of Information Act requests were sent to 56 National Health Service Trusts.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven trusts (66%) provided data. The gradual decline in the use of ECT in England has levelled off at about 2,500 people per year. There was a 47-fold difference between the Trusts with the highest and lowest rates per capita. Most recipients are still women (67%) and over 60 (58%). Only one Trust could report how many people received psychological therapy prior to ECT, as required by government (NICE) guidelines. More than a third of ECT (37%) is still given without consent, with 18% of Trusts non-compliant with legislation concerning second opinions. There were slight declines, compared to a previous audit, in the use of standardized depression scales, down to 30%, and standardized measures of cognitive dysfunction, down to 24%. Only six Trusts provided any data for positive outcomes and seven for adverse effects. None provided data on efficacy or adverse effects beyond the end of treatment. Twelve Trusts used identical sentences to each other, verbatim, in response to one or more questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the apparent failure of current monitoring and accrediting of ECT clinics in England, by the Royal College of Psychiatrists' ECT Accreditation Service (ECTAS), an independent government sponsored review is urgently needed.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

Psychologists and other mental health staff should ensure that people are offered evidence-based psychological treatments before being offered E.C.T. All staff should ensure that patients are fully informed of the high risk of memory loss and the smaller risk of cardiovascular failure and mortality. Individuals receiving ECT should be closely monitored for adverse cognitive effects, and treatment immediately terminated if these become apparent. Because of increased risk of memory loss for women and older people, the use of ECT should be kept to a minimum and avoided where possible, with these two groups.

摘要

目的

评估自2011年、2013年和2015年的一项审计以来,英格兰在改善电休克治疗(ECT)管理方面取得的进展。2019年收集了关于使用情况、人口统计学、同意情况以及对国家指南和《精神健康法》的遵守情况的相同信息。

设计与方法

根据《信息自由法》向56家国民保健服务信托机构发出请求。

结果

37家信托机构(66%)提供了数据。英格兰ECT使用量的逐渐下降已趋于平稳,每年约2500人。人均使用率最高和最低的信托机构之间相差47倍。大多数接受者仍然是女性(67%)且年龄在60岁以上(58%)。只有一家信托机构能够按照政府(国家卫生与临床优化研究所)指南的要求报告有多少人在接受ECT之前接受了心理治疗。超过三分之一的ECT治疗(37%)仍然是在未经同意的情况下进行的,18%的信托机构不符合关于提供第二种意见的立法规定。与之前的审计相比,标准化抑郁量表的使用略有下降,降至30%,认知功能障碍的标准化测量指标降至24%。只有6家信托机构提供了任何关于积极结果的数据,7家提供了关于不良反应的数据。没有一家机构提供治疗结束后疗效或不良反应的数据。12家信托机构在回答一个或多个问题时,逐字使用了彼此相同的句子。

结论

鉴于英国皇家精神科医学院的ECT认证服务(ECTAS)目前对英格兰ECT诊所的监测和认证显然失败,迫切需要进行一次由政府发起的独立审查。

从业者要点

心理学家和其他心理健康工作人员应确保在为人们提供ECT之前,先为其提供循证心理治疗。所有工作人员应确保患者充分了解记忆丧失的高风险以及心血管衰竭和死亡的较小风险。接受ECT的个体应密切监测是否有不良认知影响,如果这些影响明显,应立即终止治疗。由于女性和老年人记忆丧失的风险增加,应尽量减少对这两组人群使用ECT,并尽可能避免使用。

相似文献

1
A second independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy in England, 2019: Usage, demographics, consent, and adherence to guidelines and legislation.2019年英国电休克治疗的第二次独立审计:使用情况、人口统计学特征、同意情况以及对指南和立法的遵守情况
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):603-619. doi: 10.1111/papt.12335. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
An audit of ECT in England 2011-2015: Usage, demographics, and adherence to guidelines and legislation.2011-2015 年英国电抽搐治疗审计:使用情况、人口统计学特征以及对指南和法规的遵循情况。
Psychol Psychother. 2018 Sep;91(3):263-277. doi: 10.1111/papt.12160. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
3
ECTAS Response to 'A second independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy in England, 2019: Usage, demographics, consent, and, adherence to guidelines and legislation'.ECTAS对《2019年英格兰电休克治疗的第二次独立审计:使用情况、人口统计学、同意情况以及对指南和立法的遵守情况》的回应
Psychol Psychother. 2022 Jun;95(2):615-616. doi: 10.1111/papt.12380. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Electroconvulsive therapy in Scottish clinical practice: a national audit of demographics, standards, and outcome.
J ECT. 2004 Sep;20(3):166-73. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200409000-00008.
5
An independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.北爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士的电抽搐治疗患者信息传单的独立审计。
Psychol Psychother. 2023 Dec;96(4):885-901. doi: 10.1111/papt.12481. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Ketamine augmentation of electroconvulsive therapy to improve neuropsychological and clinical outcomes in depression (Ketamine-ECT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial.氯胺酮增强电休克治疗改善抑郁症的神经心理学和临床结局(氯胺酮-ECT):一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行组、优效性试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 May;4(5):365-377. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30077-9. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Knowledge of ECT among staff of a mental health service.
J ECT. 2003 Dec;19(4):245-6. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200312000-00014.
8
Compliance with ECT NICE guidance by the John Connolly ECT clinic: January 2010 - July 2010.John Connolly 电抽搐治疗诊所 2010 年 1 月至 7 月期间对 ECT NICE 指南的执行情况。
Psychiatr Danub. 2011 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S99-103.
9
Auditing electroconvulsive therapy. The third cycle.电休克治疗审计。第三个周期。
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 May;172:401-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.5.401.
10
Information, consent and perceived coercion: patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;186:54-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.1.54.

引用本文的文献

1
A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?对1144名接受电休克治疗者、家庭成员及朋友的调查:电休克治疗有效吗?
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70109. doi: 10.1111/inm.70109.
2
Long-Term Adverse Effects After Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT): A Narrative Analysis Exploring People's Experiences, Meaning-Making, and Coping.电休克治疗(ECT)后的长期不良影响:一项探索人们经历、意义建构和应对方式的叙事分析
Qual Health Res. 2024 Dec 9:10497323241303391. doi: 10.1177/10497323241303391.
3
Electroconvulsive Therapy Across Nations: A 2022 Survey of Practice.
跨国家电抽搐治疗:2022 年实践调查。
J ECT. 2024 Jun 1;40(2):96-104. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000980. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
A response to yet another defence of ECT in the absence of robust efficacy and safety evidence.针对缺乏有力疗效和安全性证据的情况下再次为电休克疗法辩护的回应。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Feb 15;31:e13. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000846.