Suppr超能文献

剪切波弹性成像技术在乳腺诊断中的应用:技术图像质量参数对诊断准确性的影响。

Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Impact of Technical Image Quality Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, WAC 240, Boston, MA 02114.

Department of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 May;216(5):1205-1215. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22728. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of shear-wave elastography (SWE) image quality parameters on the diagnostic performance of elasticity measurements in classifying breast lesions. This retrospective study included 281 breast lesions that underwent SWE and ultrasound-guided biopsy performed between October 1, 2017, and August 31, 2018. Three readers who were blinded to pathologic outcomes independently scored the image quality of each SWE image (with low quality denoted by a score of 0 and high quality indicated by a score of 1) on the basis of five parameters: B-mode visualization of the lesion on a dual-panel display, SWE red pattern (denoting high stiffness) in the near field of the FOV, appearance of the surrounding tissue, FOV placement, and ROI placement for the maximum (E), minimum (E), mean (E), and SD (E) of Young modulus elasticity measurements. Using ROC analysis, we compared the performance of E, E, and E in diagnosing malignancy on low- and high-quality images on the basis of consensus (i.e., majority) scores for each individual quality parameter as well as two models combining a few of the quality parameters. Three quality parameters (B-mode visualization of the lesion, presence of a near-field red pattern, and the appearance of the surrounding tissue) showed moderate-to-substantial interobserver agreement. SWE images were considered high quality ( = 167) if both B-mode visualization and near-field red pattern received a consensus score of 1, and they were considered low quality ( = 114) if either parameter received a consensus score of 0. High-quality images had a statistically higher AUC value than low-quality images when E ( < .001), E ( = .002), and E ( < .001) were used as classifiers of malignancy. Quality parameters can support radiologists who are performing and interpreting breast SWE images. These quality parameters have the potential to improve the accuracy of SWE in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.

摘要

本研究旨在确定剪切波弹性成像(SWE)图像质量参数对弹性测量在分类乳腺病变中的诊断性能的影响。这项回顾性研究纳入了 281 个在 2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日期间接受 SWE 和超声引导活检的乳腺病变。三位读者在不知情病理结果的情况下,基于五个参数,对每个 SWE 图像的图像质量进行独立评分(低质量记为 0 分,高质量记为 1 分):双屏显示病变的 B 模式可视化、视野近场的 SWE 红色模式(表示高硬度)、周围组织的外观、视野放置和 ROI 放置用于杨氏模量弹性测量的最大值(E)、最小值(E)、平均值(E)和标准偏差(E)。通过 ROC 分析,我们比较了低质量和高质量图像上基于每个单独质量参数的共识(即多数)评分以及结合少数质量参数的两种模型的 E、E 和 E 在诊断恶性肿瘤方面的性能。三个质量参数(病变的 B 模式可视化、近场红色模式的存在和周围组织的外观)显示出中等至较大的观察者间一致性。如果 B 模式可视化和近场红色模式均获得共识评分 1,则认为 SWE 图像质量较高(=167);如果任一参数获得共识评分 0,则认为 SWE 图像质量较低(=114)。当 E(<.001)、E(=.002)和 E(<.001)用作恶性肿瘤分类器时,高质量图像的 AUC 值显著高于低质量图像。质量参数可以支持进行和解释乳腺 SWE 图像的放射科医生。这些质量参数有可能提高 SWE 区分恶性和良性乳腺病变的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验