Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, USA.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, USA.
Am J Case Rep. 2021 Mar 17;22:e929412. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.929412.
BACKGROUND Naloxone remains the mainstay for the treatment of opioids overdose both in the clinical and public settings. Naloxone has been showing relative safety, leading to trivial adverdse effects which are mostly due to acute withdrawal effects, but when used in patients with known long-term addiction, it usually requires additional dosing or rapid infusion to achieve detoxification effects in a timely manner or to sustain the effects after they fade away. In some patients this has resulted in fatal adverse effects, including non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema (NCPE), which may require intensive care for those patients. Whether the higher dose is the cause has been debatable and not enough studies have looked into this subject. CASE REPORT Here, we report a series of 2 cases where 2 young patients were given naloxone following opioid overdose. Both our patients required frequent dosing due to insufficient response or owing to the washout of the naloxone effect shortly after, given its short half-life. Although the administered doses were different, both patients developed the adverse effect of NCPE and required ventilator support. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that such a catastrophic adverse effect following the administration of such a critical medication, which is known to be relatively safe and is being publicized for saving lives, might limit its use and would require more attention and further studies to standardize a safe dose, limiting these life-threatening events and decreasing the need for unnecessary invasive respiratory support as well as admissions to intensive care units, which might create an additional burden on the health care system.
背景 纳洛酮仍然是治疗临床和公共环境中阿片类药物过量的主要药物。纳洛酮已显示出相对安全性,导致轻微的不良反应,这些不良反应主要是由于急性戒断效应,但当用于已知长期成瘾的患者时,通常需要额外的剂量或快速输注,以及时达到解毒效果,或在效果消失后维持效果。在一些患者中,这导致了致命的不良反应,包括非心源性肺水肿(NCPE),这可能需要对这些患者进行重症监护。更高的剂量是否是原因一直存在争议,而且没有足够的研究关注这个问题。
病例报告 在这里,我们报告了 2 例年轻患者在阿片类药物过量后接受纳洛酮治疗的情况。由于反应不足或由于纳洛酮作用在短时间内消退,我们的 2 位患者都需要频繁给药,因为其半衰期较短。尽管给予的剂量不同,但两位患者均出现 NCPE 的不良反应,并需要呼吸机支持。
结论 有证据表明,在给予这种众所周知相对安全并被宣传用于挽救生命的关键药物后,会出现如此灾难性的不良反应,可能会限制其使用,并需要更多的关注和进一步的研究来确定安全剂量,以限制这些危及生命的事件,并减少对不必要的侵入性呼吸支持以及重症监护病房的住院治疗的需求,这可能会给医疗保健系统带来额外的负担。