KEMRI/USAMRD-K, Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0244786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244786. eCollection 2021.
There is an urgent need for reliable region-specific hematological reference values for clinical monitoring. Laboratory reference ranges are important for assessing study participant eligibility, toxicity grading and management of adverse events in clinical trials and clinical diagnosis. Most clinical laboratories in Kenya rely on hematological reference values provided by instrument manufacturers and/or textbooks, which are based on population from Europe or North America. The use of such values in medical practice could result in improper patient management, selection bias in selection of appropriate participants for clinical trials and flawed classification of the clinical adverse events when applied to African populations. The aim of this study was to establish local laboratory hematological reference values in infants aged 1 month to 17 months from Kombewa Sub-county that could be true representative of the existing rural population. The study participants in the current study were those who had previously been recruited from GSK-sponsored study. This study was a phase III, Double Blind, Randomized, GSK-sponsored, Malaria Vaccine Clinical Trial that was conducted in infants aged 1month to 17months. 1,509 participants were included in the study analysis. Data were partitioned into 3 different age groups (1-6 months[m], 6-12 m and 12-17 m) and differences between gender were compared within each group. Data were analyzed using Graphpad prism V5 to generate 95% reference ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentile). There was evidence of gender differences in hemoglobin values (p = 0.0189) and platelet counts (p = 0.0005) in the 1 to 6m group. For the 12-17m group, there were differences in MCV (p<0.0001) and MCH (p = 0.0003). Comparing gender differences for all age groups, differences were noted in percent lymphocytes (p = 0.0396), percent monocytes (p = 0.0479), percent granulocytes (p = 0.0044), hemoglobin (p = 0.0204), hematocrit (p = 0.0448), MCV (p = 0.0092), MCH (p = 0.0089), MCHC (p = 0.0336) and absolute granulocytes (p = 0.0237). In 1 to 6m age group and all age groups assessed, for WBCs, hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV and lymphocytes absolute counts, both 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for Kisumu infants were higher than those from Kilifi. Platelet ranges for Kisumu children were narrower compared to Kilifi ranges. Kisumu hematology reference ranges were observed to be higher than the ranges of Tanzanian children for the WBCs, absolute lymphocyte and monocyte counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit and MCV. Higher ranges of WBCs, absolute lymphocyte and monocyte counts were observed compared to the values in US/Europe. Wider ranges were observed in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and MCV. Wider ranges were observed in platelet counts in Kisumu infants compared to the US/Europe ranges. Compared to Harriet Lane Handbook reference values that are used in the area, higher counts were observed in WBC counts, both absolute and percent lymphocyte counts, as well as monocyte counts for current study. Wider ranges were observed in RBC, platelets and RDW, while lower ranges noted in the current study for hemoglobin, hematocrit and granulocyte counts. This study underscores the importance of using locally established hematology reference ranges of different age groups in support of proper patient management and for clinical trials.
目前,临床监测急需可靠的特定区域血液学参考值。实验室参考范围对于评估研究参与者的资格、毒性分级以及临床试验和临床诊断中不良事件的管理非常重要。肯尼亚大多数临床实验室依赖仪器制造商和/或教科书提供的血液学参考值,这些参考值基于欧洲或北美的人群。在医学实践中使用这些值可能导致患者管理不当、临床试验中适当参与者的选择偏差以及当应用于非洲人群时临床不良事件的分类不当。本研究旨在建立 Kombewa 次县 1 至 17 个月龄婴儿的本地实验室血液学参考值,这些参考值能够真正代表现有的农村人口。本研究的研究参与者是先前从 GSK 赞助的研究中招募的参与者。本研究是一项在 1 至 17 个月龄婴儿中进行的 III 期、双盲、随机、GSK 赞助的疟疾疫苗临床试验。共有 1,509 名参与者纳入研究分析。数据分为 3 个不同年龄组(1-6 个月[m]、6-12 个月和 12-17 个月),并在每个组内比较了性别差异。使用 Graphpad prism V5 分析数据,生成 95%的参考范围(第 2.5 百分位至第 97.5 百分位)。在 1 至 6 个月组中,血红蛋白值(p = 0.0189)和血小板计数(p = 0.0005)存在性别差异。对于 12-17 个月组,MCV(p<0.0001)和 MCH(p = 0.0003)存在差异。比较所有年龄组的性别差异,发现淋巴细胞百分比(p = 0.0396)、单核细胞百分比(p = 0.0479)、粒细胞百分比(p = 0.0044)、血红蛋白(p = 0.0204)、血细胞比容(p = 0.0448)、MCV(p = 0.0092)、MCH(p = 0.0089)、MCHC(p = 0.0336)和绝对粒细胞(p = 0.0237)存在差异。在 1 至 6 个月龄组和评估的所有年龄组中,对于白细胞计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、MCV 和淋巴细胞绝对计数,基苏木婴儿的第 2.5 百分位和第 97.5 百分位均高于基利菲的相应值。基苏木儿童的血小板范围比基利菲的范围窄。与坦桑尼亚儿童的参考值相比,基苏木的血液学参考范围观察到白细胞计数、绝对淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容和 MCV 较高。与美国/欧洲相比,观察到白细胞计数、绝对淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数较高。与美国/欧洲的参考值相比,观察到血红蛋白、血细胞比容和 MCV 范围较宽。与美国/欧洲的范围相比,基苏木婴儿的血小板计数范围较宽。与该地区使用的哈丽特·兰纳手册参考值相比,当前研究观察到白细胞计数、绝对和百分比淋巴细胞计数以及单核细胞计数更高。红细胞、血小板和 RDW 的范围较宽,而当前研究中血红蛋白、血细胞比容和粒细胞计数的范围较低。本研究强调了在支持适当的患者管理和临床试验中使用不同年龄组的本地建立的血液学参考范围的重要性。